The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Overalkylation of a Protein Digest with Iodoacetamide
Abstract
Cystine linkages in proteins are often opened with reducing agents, sometimes to improve their digestion, often to eliminate disulfide linkages from complicating analysis of the digest. After reduction, the sulfhydryls are usually reacted with iodoacetamide (IAM), iodoacetic acid (IAA), or another electrophile to prevent reformation of disulfide linkages in a random manner. When the amount of protein may be reliably estimated, side reactions from excess IAM or IAA can be avoided. When this is not so, removal of excess iodoalkane can be accomplished by HPLC, by dialysis, or simply by allowing a reducing thiol to consume any excess. In mass spectrometric analysis of proteins isolated by 1D or 2D gels, removal of the excess iodoalkane is often accomplished simply by washing the gel prior to proteolytic digestion. During a recent study of the glutathionylation site mapping of actin, IAM was used to block any residual sulfhydryl groups remaining on the protein so that they would not displace glutathione from its initial site. In addition, to avoid losses due to actin polymerization during dialysis, the IAM was allowed to remain during the digestion. This further ensured that any sulfhydryl groups liberated during the digestion would be similarly blocked by the IAM. Under these conditions, we observed the peptides to undergo N- as well as S-carbamidomethylation. In examining a series of other peptides alkylated with IAM in this way, we have found N-alkylation to be the rule rather than the exception and even O-alkylation was detected. The main sites to which the carbamidomethyl group attaches to the peptides have been located with LC-MS2 using an ion trap mass spectrometer and found to be the N-terminal amino group. A simple expedient to prevent such reactions when an excess of reducing agent must be avoided is to run the alkylation in the presence of a thioether such as 2,2'-thiodiethanol rather than a thiol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Iodoacetamide-induced artifact mimics ubiquitination in mass spectrometry
Nielsen, M. L., Vermeulen, M., Bonaldi, T., Cox, J., Moroder, L., & Mann, M. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth0608-459 · Cited by 286
Muneeruddin, K., Nazzaro, M., & Kaltashov, I. A. (2015) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02982 · Cited by 98
Bush, D. R., Zang, L., Belov, A. M., Ivanov, A. R., & Karger, B. L. (2016) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03218 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Boja, E. S., & Fales, H. M.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-06-30
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3576-3582
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2009897062
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.