The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of Quantitative Proteomic Data Generated via Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology
Abstract
We describe the analysis of quantitative proteomic samples via multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT). Ratio amounts of the soluble portion of the S. cerevisiae proteome from cultures of S. cerevisiae strain S288C grown in either 14N minimal media or 15N-enriched minimal media were mixed and digested into a complex peptide mixture. A 1 x 14N/1 x 15N complex peptide mixture was analyzed by single-dimensional reversed-phase chromatography and electrospray ionization quadrapole time-of-flight mass spectrometry in order to demonstrate the replacement of 14N by 15N under the growth conditions used. After conformation of the incorporation of 15N into the labeled sample, three separate samples consisting of a 1 x 14N/1 x 15N complex peptide mixture, a 5 x 14N/1 x 15N complex peptide mixture, and a 10 x 14N/1 x 15N complex peptide mixture were analyzed via MudPIT. We demonstrate the dynamic range of the system by analyzing a 1:1, 5:1, and 10:1 data set using the soluble portion from S. cerevisiae grown in either 14N or 15N-enriched minimal media. The method described provides an accurate way to undertake a large-scale quantitative proteomic study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Thompson, A., Schäfer, J., Kuhn, K., Kienle, S., Schwarz, J., Schmidt, G., Neumann, T., & Hamon, C. (2003) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0262560 · Cited by 2,378
Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale
Greenbaum, D. (2003) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-117 · Cited by 1,692
Peng, J., Elias, J. E., Thoreen, C. C., Licklider, L. J., & Gygi, S. P. (2003) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr025556v · Cited by 1,647
Dieterich, D. C., Link, A. J., Graumann, J., Tirrell, D. A., & Schuman, E. M. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601637103 · Cited by 874
Quantitative, High-Resolution Proteomics for Data-Driven Systems Biology
Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2011) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-061308-093216 · Cited by 685
Metadata
- Authors
- Washburn, M. P., Ulaszek, R., Deciu, C., Schieltz, D. M., & Yates, J. R.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-03-05
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1650-1657
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2088392539
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Quantitative Proteomic Data Generated via Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac015704l
- The paper
- Washburn, M. P., Ulaszek, R., Deciu, C., Schieltz, D. M., & Yates, J. R. (2002). Analysis of Quantitative Proteomic Data Generated via Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac015704l
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.