The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination of N-Glycosylation Sites and Site Heterogeneity in Glycoproteins
Abstract
An approach for the characterization of glycosylation sites and oligosaccharide heterogeneity in glycoproteins based on a combination of nonspecific proteolysis, deglycosylation, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization Fourier transform mass spectrometry (MALDI-FT MS) is described. Glycoproteins were digested with Pronase yielding primarily glycopeptides and amino acids. Nonglycosylated peptide fragments were susceptible to complete Pronase digestion to their constituent amino acids. Steric hindrance prohibited the digestion of the peptide moiety attached to the glycan. Glycopeptides were desalted and concentrated using solid-phase extraction and analyzed by MALDI MS. The oligosaccharides were also analyzed by MALDI MS after releasing the glycans from glycoproteins using PNGase F. The peptide moiety of the glycopeptides was identified by subtracting the masses of the glycans derived from PNGase F treatment from the masses of the glycopeptides. The experimental strategy was validated using glycoproteins with known oligosaccharide structures, ribonuclease B and chicken ovalbumin. This procedure was then used to determine the N-glycosylation sites and site heterogeneity of a glycoprotein whose glycosylation pattern was unknown, namely, the Xenopus laevis egg cortical granule lectin. This procedure is useful for determining protein site heterogeneity and structural heterogeneities of the oligosaccharide moiety of glycoproteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intracellular Functions of N-Linked Glycans
Helenius, A., & Aebi, A. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5512.2364 · Cited by 2,405
Cited by
Mass spectrometry approaches to glycomic and glycoproteomic analyses
Ruhaak, L. R., Xu, G., Li, Q., Goonatilleke, E., & Lebrilla, C. B. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00732 · Cited by 395
Self-citationHigh-sensitivity Analytical Approaches for the Structural Characterization of Glycoproteins
Alley, W. R., Mann, B. F., & Novotny, M. V. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003714 · Cited by 310
Huhn, C., Selman, M. H. J., Ruhaak, L. R., Deelder, A. M., & Wuhrer, M. (2009) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200800715 · Cited by 301
Determination of glycosylation sites and site-specific heterogeneity in glycoproteins
An, H. J., Froehlich, J. W., & Lebrilla, C. B. (2009) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.07.022 · Cited by 280
Self-citationMucin‐type O‐glycosylation – putting the pieces together
Jensen, P. H., Kolarich, D., & Packer, N. H. (2010) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07429.x · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- An, H. J., Peavy, T. R., Hedrick, J. L., & Lebrilla, C. B.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-09-11
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 5628-5637
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2065331767
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.