The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Proteomic Approach for Quantitation of Phosphorylation Using Stable Isotope Labeling in Cell Culture
Abstract
Posttranslational modifications are major mechanisms of regulating protein activity and function in vertebrate cells. It is essential to obtain qualitative information about posttranslational modification patterns of proteins to understand signal transduction mechanisms in greater detail. However, it is equally important to measure the dynamics of posttranslational modifications such as phosphorylation to approach signaling networks from a systems biology perspective. Despite a number of advances, methods to quantitate posttranslational modifications remain difficult to implement due to a number of factors including lack of a generic method, elaborate chemical steps, and requirement for large amounts of sample. We have previously shown that stable isotope-containing amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) can be used to differentially label growing cell populations for quantitation of protein levels. In this report, we extend the use of SILAC as a novel proteomic approach for the relative quantitation of posttranslational modifications such as phosphorylation. We have used SILAC to quantitate the extent of known phosphorylation sites as well as to identify and quantitate novel phosphorylation sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mass spectrometry–based proteomics turns quantitative
Ong, S.-E., & Mann, M. (2005) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio736 · Cited by 1,572
Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC
Mann, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2067 · Cited by 931
Lerin, C., Rodgers, J. T., Kalume, D. E., Kim, S.-H., Pandey, A., & Puigserver, P. (2006) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2006.04.013 · Cited by 443
Self-citationAdipokines: A treasure trove for the discovery of biomarkers for metabolic disorders
Lehr, S., Hartwig, S., & Sell, H. (2012) · PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications · doi:10.1002/prca.201100052 · Cited by 352
Metabolic Labeling of Proteins for Proteomics
Beynon, R. J., & Pratt, J. M. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r400010-mcp200 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Ibarrola, N., Kalume, D. E., Gronborg, M., Iwahori, A., & Pandey, A.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-10-11
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 6043-6049
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2063632686
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Proteomic Approach for Quantitation of Phosphorylation Using Stable Isotope Labeling in Cell Culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac034931f
- The paper
- Ibarrola, N., Kalume, D. E., Gronborg, M., Iwahori, A., & Pandey, A. (2003). A Proteomic Approach for Quantitation of Phosphorylation Using Stable Isotope Labeling in Cell Culture. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac034931f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.