Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of Surface-Enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering from Unaggregated and Aggregated Nanoparticles

Faulds, Karen, Littleford, Rachael E., Graham, Duncan, Dent, Geoffrey, Smith, W. Ewen·2004·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

The effect of excitation frequency and state of aggregation on the sensitivity obtained in ultratrace analysis using colloidal suspensions of silver nanoparticles and surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering (SERRS) detection is explored to define suitable conditions for quantitative analysis. Two structurally similar dyes, only one of which causes aggregation, were used as analytes without the use of external aggregating agents, thus simplifying the surface chemistry and removing a major source of error. Addition of the nonaggregating dye caused no change in particle charge or size and no time-dependent aggregation as measured by zeta potential and particle size analysis. The most intense single-particle scattering was obtained using excitation at the wavelength of the plasmon resonance. Molecular resonance added approximately 2 orders of magnitude in sensitivity. Addition of the aggregating dye caused a reduction in surface charge of the particles and initiated a time-dependent aggregation process. However, constant SERRS with time is obtained at some excitation wavelengths probably because a constant number of clusters active at these wavelengths is maintained in the dynamic aggregation process. The additional enhancement caused by aggregation and molecular resonance is spread over a range of excitation frequencies. However, electronic spectra suggested that plasmon resonance enhancement would be effective at the longest wavelength of excitation used (785 nm), but there was a significant drop in intensity this far away from the absorbance maximum of the dye (429 nm). Thus, sensitive analysis using suspensions of single nanoparticles is feasible provided the excitation frequency used is close to that of the plasmon resonance frequency. Aggregation adds only an enhancement of approximately 6 in the experiments performed since only some particles in aggregates will have an active plasmon at any one wavelength, but the range of excitation wavelengths at which good enhancement is obtained is wider giving more flexibility if more complexity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac035053o

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Faulds, K., Littleford, R. E., Graham, D., Dent, G., & Smith, W. E.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2003-12-20
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
592-598
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2093992606
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Surface-Enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering from Unaggregated and Aggregated Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac035053o
The paper
Faulds, K., Littleford, R. E., Graham, D., Dent, G., & Smith, W. E. (2004). Comparison of Surface-Enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering from Unaggregated and Aggregated Nanoparticles. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac035053o

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.