The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving Reproducibility and Sensitivity in Identifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics
Abstract
Identifying proteins in cell extracts by shotgun proteomics involves digesting the proteins, sequencing the resulting peptides by data-dependent mass spectrometry (MS/MS), and searching protein databases to identify the proteins from which the peptides are derived. Manual analysis and direct spectral comparison reveal that scores from two commonly used search programs (Sequest and Mascot) validate less than half of potentially identifiable MS/MS spectra (class positive) from shotgun analyses of the human erythroleukemia K562 cell line. Here we demonstrate increased sensitivity and accuracy using a focused search strategy along with a peptide sequence validation script that does not rely exclusively on XCorr or Mowse scores generated by Sequest or Mascot, but uses consensus between the search programs, along with chemical properties and scores describing the nature of the fragmentation spectrum (ion score and RSP). The approach yielded 4.2% false positive and 8% false negative frequencies in peptide assignments. The protein profile is then assembled from peptide assignments using a novel peptide-centric protein nomenclature that more accurately reports protein variants that contain identical peptide sequences. An Isoform Resolver algorithm ensures that the protein count is not inflated by variants in the protein database, eliminating approximately 25% of redundant proteins. Analysis of soluble proteins from a human K562 cells identified 5130 unique proteins, with approximately 100 false positive protein assignments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elias, J. E., & Gygi, S. P. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1019 · Cited by 3,925
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Comparison of Label-free Methods for Quantifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics
Old, W. M., Meyer-Arendt, K., Aveline-Wolf, L., Pierce, K. G., Mendoza, A., Sevinsky, J. R., Resing, K. A., & Ahn, N. G. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m500084-mcp200 · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationInterpretation of Shotgun Proteomic Data
Nesvizhskii, A. I., & Aebersold, R. (2005) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r500012-mcp200 · Cited by 1,025
Tabb, D. L., Vega-Montoto, L., Rudnick, P. A., Variyath, A. M., Ham, A.-J. L., Bunk, D. M., Kilpatrick, L. E., Billheimer, D. D., Blackman, R. K., Cardasis, H. L., et al. (2010) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr9006365 · Cited by 551
Metadata
- Authors
- Resing, K. A., Meyer-Arendt, K., Mendoza, A. M., Aveline-Wolf, L. D., Jonscher, K. R., Pierce, K. G., Old, W. M., Cheung, H. T., Russell, S., Wattawa, J. L., Goehle, G. R., Knight, R. D., & Ahn, N. G.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-05-25
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3556-3568
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2024141877
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Reproducibility and Sensitivity in Identifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac035229m
- The paper
- Resing, K. A., Meyer-Arendt, K., Mendoza, A. M., Aveline-Wolf, L. D., Jonscher, K. R., Pierce, K. G., Old, W. M., Cheung, H. T., Russell, S., Wattawa, J. L., Goehle, G. R., Knight, R. D., & Ahn, N. G. (2004). Improving Reproducibility and Sensitivity in Identifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac035229m
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.