Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improving Reproducibility and Sensitivity in Identifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics

Resing, Katheryn A., Meyer-Arendt, Karen, Mendoza, Alex M., Aveline-Wolf, Lauren D., Jonscher, Karen R., Pierce, Kevin G., Old, William M., Cheung, Hiu T., Russell, Steven, Wattawa, Joy L., Goehle, Geoff R., Knight, Robin D., Ahn, Natalie G.·2004·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Identifying proteins in cell extracts by shotgun proteomics involves digesting the proteins, sequencing the resulting peptides by data-dependent mass spectrometry (MS/MS), and searching protein databases to identify the proteins from which the peptides are derived. Manual analysis and direct spectral comparison reveal that scores from two commonly used search programs (Sequest and Mascot) validate less than half of potentially identifiable MS/MS spectra (class positive) from shotgun analyses of the human erythroleukemia K562 cell line. Here we demonstrate increased sensitivity and accuracy using a focused search strategy along with a peptide sequence validation script that does not rely exclusively on XCorr or Mowse scores generated by Sequest or Mascot, but uses consensus between the search programs, along with chemical properties and scores describing the nature of the fragmentation spectrum (ion score and RSP). The approach yielded 4.2% false positive and 8% false negative frequencies in peptide assignments. The protein profile is then assembled from peptide assignments using a novel peptide-centric protein nomenclature that more accurately reports protein variants that contain identical peptide sequences. An Isoform Resolver algorithm ensures that the protein count is not inflated by variants in the protein database, eliminating approximately 25% of redundant proteins. Analysis of soluble proteins from a human K562 cells identified 5130 unique proteins, with approximately 100 false positive protein assignments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac035229m

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Resing, K. A., Meyer-Arendt, K., Mendoza, A. M., Aveline-Wolf, L. D., Jonscher, K. R., Pierce, K. G., Old, W. M., Cheung, H. T., Russell, S., Wattawa, J. L., Goehle, G. R., Knight, R. D., & Ahn, N. G.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2004-05-25
Volume
76
Issue
13
Pages
3556-3568
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2024141877
Cited by
228
References
0
FWCI
13.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Reproducibility and Sensitivity in Identifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac035229m
The paper
Resing, K. A., Meyer-Arendt, K., Mendoza, A. M., Aveline-Wolf, L. D., Jonscher, K. R., Pierce, K. G., Old, W. M., Cheung, H. T., Russell, S., Wattawa, J. L., Goehle, G. R., Knight, R. D., & Ahn, N. G. (2004). Improving Reproducibility and Sensitivity in Identifying Human Proteins by Shotgun Proteomics. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac035229m

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.