The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical Characterization of the Charge State and Residue Dependence of Low-Energy CID Peptide Dissociation Patterns
Open accessAbstract
Data mining was performed on 28 330 unique peptide tandem mass spectra for which sequences were assigned with high confidence. By dividing the spectra into different sets based on structural features and charge states of the corresponding peptides, chemical interactions involved in promoting specific cleavage patterns in gas-phase peptides were characterized. Pairwise fragmentation maps describing cleavages at all Xxx-Zzz residue combinations for b and y ions reveal that the difference in basicity between Arg and Lys results in different dissociation patterns for singly charged Arg- and Lys-ending tryptic peptides. While one dominant protonation form (proton localized) exists for Arg-ending peptides, a heterogeneous population of different protonated forms or more facile interconversion of protonated forms (proton partially mobile) exists for Lys-ending peptides. Cleavage C-terminal to acidic residues dominates spectra from singly charged peptides that have a localized proton and cleavage N-terminal to Pro dominates those that have a mobile or partially mobile proton. When Pro is absent from peptides that have a mobile or partially mobile proton, cleavage at each peptide bond becomes much more prominent. Whether the above patterns can be found in b ions, y ions, or both depends on the location of the proton holder(s) in multiply protonated peptides. Enhanced cleavages C-terminal to branched aliphatic residues (Ile, Val, Leu) are observed in both b and y ions from peptides that have a mobile proton, as well as in y ions from peptides that have a partially mobile proton; enhanced cleavages N-terminal to these residues are observed in b ions from peptides that have a partially mobile proton. Statistical tools have been designed to visualize the fragmentation maps and measure the similarity between them. The pairwise cleavage patterns observed expand our knowledge of peptide gas-phase fragmentation behaviors and may be useful in algorithm development that employs improved models to predict fragment ion intensities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01511 · Cited by 6,955
Cited by
Interferences and contaminants encountered in modern mass spectrometry
Keller, B. O., Sui, J., Young, A. B., & Whittal, R. M. (2008) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2008.04.043 · Cited by 623
Lam, H., Deutsch, E. W., Eddes, J. S., Eng, J. K., King, N., Stein, S. E., & Aebersold, R. (2007) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200600625 · Cited by 517
Performance Characteristics of Electron Transfer Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
Good, D. M., Wirtala, M., McAlister, G. C., & Coon, J. J. (2007) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m700073-mcp200 · Cited by 396
Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry
Boersema, P. J., Mohammed, S., & Heck, A. J. R. (2009) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1599 · Cited by 362
Proteomics of Integral Membrane ProteinsTheory and Application
Speers, A. E., & Wu, C. C. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068286z · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, Y., Triscari, J. M., Tseng, G. C., Pasa-Tolic, L., Lipton, M. S., Smith, R. D., & Wysocki, V. H.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-08-18
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 5800-5813
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2051644573
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.