The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital Microfluidics with In-Line Sample Purification for Proteomics Analyses with MALDI-MS
Abstract
An in-line sample purification method for MALDI-MS, which relies on the electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD)-based technique for digital microfluidics, is reported. In this method, a droplet containing peptides and impurities is moved by EWOD and deposited onto a Teflon-AF surface. A droplet of water is subsequently moved over the spot, where it dissolves and removes the impurities. A droplet containing MALDI matrix is then moved to the spot, which is analyzed by MALDI-MS. This purification method reduces the number of salt adduct peaks caused by low concentrations of impurities (e.g., 20 mM sodium phosphate), and reduces or eliminates the catastrophic effects of high concentrations of impurities (e.g., 8 M urea). The method was used to purify spots made by depositing multiple droplets of contaminated peptides. Spectra from the purified spots showed an increase in the S/N ratio as a function of the number of droplets deposited; when not purified, the S/N ratio remained constant regardless of the number of droplets. Finally, the method was used to purify protein digests for peptide mass fragment (PMF) searches, and was shown to be more efficient than the conventional method of purification with reversed-phase-packed pipet tips. We anticipate this new, in-line sample purification technique for EWOD-MALDI-MS will enable development of integrated high-throughput proteomics analysis methodologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J. C., Creasy, D. M., & Cottrell, J. S. (1999) · Electrophoresis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::aid-elps3551>3.0.co;2-2 · Cited by 8,203
Electrowetting-based actuation of liquid droplets for microfluidic applications
Pollack, M. G., Fair, R. B., & Shenderov, A. D. (2000) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1308534 · Cited by 1,481
Srinivasan, V., Pamula, V. K., & Fair, R. B. (2004) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b403341h · Cited by 1,066
Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes
(1990) · International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes · doi:10.1016/0168-1176(90)80022-u · Cited by 1,003
Gobom, J., Nordhoff, E., Mirgorodskaya, E., Ekman, R., & Roepstorff, P. (1999) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9888(199902)34:2<105::aid-jms768>3.0.co;2-4 · Cited by 688
Prestructured MALDI-MS Sample Supports
Schuerenberg, M., Luebbert, C., Eickhoff, H., Kalkum, M., Lehrach, H. R., & Nordhoff, E. (2000) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac000092a · Cited by 323
Russell, W. K., Park, Z.-Y., & Russell, D. H. (2001) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac001332p · Cited by 281
Mayer, P., Vaes, W. H. J., & Hermens, J. L. M. (2000) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac990948f · Cited by 183
An Electrospray Ionization Source for Integration with Microfluidics
Kameoka, J., Orth, R. N., Ilic, B. R., Czaplewski, D. A., Wachs, T., & Craighead, H. G. (2002) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac020396s · Cited by 123
Blackledge, J. A., & Alexander, A. J. (1995) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00101a009 · Cited by 114
Lion, N., Gellon, J., Jensen, H. M., et al. (2003) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(03)00771-4 · Cited by 95
A Desalting Approach for MALDI-MS Using On-Probe Hydrophobic Self-Assembled Monolayers
Brockman, A. H., Dodd, B. S., & Orlando, R. (1997) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac970650u · Cited by 84
On-chip microextraction for proteomic sample preparation of in-gel digests
Ekström, S., Malmström, J. A., Wallman, L., Löfgren, M., Nilsson, J., Laurell, T., & Marko‐Varga, G. (2002) · PROTEOMICS · Cited by 73
Lion, N., Gobry, V., Jensen, H. M., Rossier, J. S., & Girault, H. H. (2002) · Electrophoresis · Cited by 47
Surfaces for interfacing protein gel electrophoresis directly with mass spectrometry
Vestling, M. M., & Fenselau, C. (1995) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.1280140302 · Cited by 46
Ericsson, D., Ekström, S., Nilsson, J., Bergquist, J., Marko‐Varga, G., & Laurell, T. (2001) · PROTEOMICS · Cited by 26
Cited by
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Choi, K., Kim, J.-Y., Ahn, J.-H., Choi, J.-M., Im, M., & Choi, Y.-K. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc21203j · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheeler, A. R., Moon, H., Bird, C. A., Ogorzalek Loo, R. R., Kim, C.-J. “. J. ”., Loo, J. A., & Garrell, R. L.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-12-17
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 534-540
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2039083654
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 14.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
