The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic Quotient Normalization as Robust Method to Account for Dilution of Complex Biological Mixtures. Application in 1H NMR Metabonomics
Abstract
For the analysis of the spectra of complex biofluids, preprocessing methods play a crucial role in rendering the subsequent data analyses more robust and accurate. Normalization is a preprocessing method, which accounts for different dilutions of samples by scaling the spectra to the same virtual overall concentration. In the field of 1H NMR metabonomics integral normalization, which scales spectra to the same total integral, is the de facto standard. In this work, it is shown that integral normalization is a suboptimal method for normalizing spectra from metabonomic studies. Especially strong metabonomic changes, evident as massive amounts of single metabolites in samples, significantly hamper the integral normalization resulting in incorrectly scaled spectra. The probabilistic quotient normalization is introduced in this work. This method is based on the calculation of a most probable dilution factor by looking at the distribution of the quotients of the amplitudes of a test spectrum by those of a reference spectrum. Simulated spectra, spectra of urine samples from a metabonomic study with cyclosporin-A as the active compound, and spectra of more than 4000 samples of control animals demonstrate that the probabilistic quotient normalization is by far more robust and more accurate than the widespread integral normalization and vector length normalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nicholson, J. K., Lindon, J. C., & Holmes, E. (1999) · Xenobiotica · doi:10.1080/004982599238047 · Cited by 3,895
Metabolomics—the link between genotypes and phenotypes
Fiehn, O. (2002) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1013713905833 · Cited by 3,445
Metabolomics — the link between genotypes and phenotypes
Fiehn, O. (2002) · Functional Genomics · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0448-0_11 · Cited by 3,167
Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics
Massart, D. L., Vandeginste, B. G. M., Buydens, L. M. C., Lewi, P. J., Smeyers-Verbeke, J., & Jong, S. D. (1998) · Cited by 1,085
Scaling and Normalization Effects in NMR Spectroscopic Metabonomic Data Sets
Craig, A., Cloarec, O., Holmes, E., Nicholson, J. K., & Lindon, J. C. (2006) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0519312 · Cited by 494
NMR‐based metabonomic approaches for evaluating physiological influences on biofluid composition
Bollard, M. E., Stanley, E. G., Lindon, J. C., Nicholson, J. K., & Holmes, E. (2005) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.935 · Cited by 473
Lindon, J. C., Nicholson, J. K., Holmes, E., Antti, H., Bollard, M. E., Keun, H., Beckonert, O., Ebbels, T. M., Reily, M. D., Robertson, D., et al. (2003) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0041-008x(02)00079-0 · Cited by 385
Self-citationHolmes, E. C., Foxall, P. J. D., Nicholson, J. K., Neild, G. H., Brown, S. M., Beddell, C. R., Sweatman, B. C., Rahr, E., Lindon, J. C., Spraul, M., et al. (1994) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1006/abio.1994.1339 · Cited by 211
Peak alignment of NMR signals by means of a genetic algorithm
Forshed, J., Schuppe‐Koistinen, I., & Jacobsson, S. P. (2003) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0003-2670(03)00570-1 · Cited by 210
Metabolic profiling: a rosetta stone for genomics?
Trethewey, R. N., Krotzky, A. J., & Willmitzert, L. (1999) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(99)80017-x · Cited by 164
Mortishire‐Smith, R. J., Skiles, G. L., Lawrence, J. W., Spence, S., Nicholls, A. W., Johnson, B. A., & Nicholson, J. K. (2004) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx034123j · Cited by 138
Analysis of longitudinal metabolomics data
Jansen, J. J., Hoefsloot, H. C. J., Boelens, H. F. M., van der Greef, J., & Smilde, A. K. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth268 · Cited by 83
Correction of Urine Cotinine Concentrations for Creatinine Excretion: Is It Useful?
Jatlow, P. I., McKee, S. A., & O’Malley, S. S. (2003) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2003.023374 · Cited by 74
Hristoskova, S., Holzgreve, W., & Hahn, S. (2003) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2003.023242 · Cited by 10
Cited by
De Filippis, F., Pellegrini, N., Vannini, L., Jeffery, I. B., La Storia, A., Laghi, L., Serrazanetti, D. I., Di Cagno, R., Ferrocino, I., Lazzi, C., et al. (2016) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309957 · Cited by 1,638
Using MetaboAnalyst 3.0 for Comprehensive Metabolomics Data Analysis
Xia, J., & Wishart, D. S. (2016) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.11 · Cited by 1,544
Human metabolic phenotype diversity and its association with diet and blood pressure
Holmes, E., Loo, R. L., Stamler, J., Bictash, M., Yap, I. K. S., Chan, Q., Ebbels, T., De Iorio, M., Brown, I. J., Veselkov, K. A., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06882 · Cited by 1,054
Fat, fibre and cancer risk in African Americans and rural Africans
O’Keefe, S. J. D., Li, J. V., Lahti, L., Ou, J., Carbonero, F., Mohammed, K., Posma, J. M., Kinross, J., Wahl, E., Ruder, E., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7342 · Cited by 982
Molecular phenomics and metagenomics of hepatic steatosis in non-diabetic obese women
Hoyles, L., Fernández-Real, J.-M., Federici, M., Serino, M., Abbott, J., Charpentier, J., Heymes, C., Luque, J. L., Anthony, E., Barton, R. H., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0061-3 · Cited by 720
Metadata
- Authors
- Dieterle, F., Ross, A., Schlotterbeck, G., & Senn, H.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-05-28
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4281-4290
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2083637865
- Cited by
- 1,768
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
