The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speciation Analysis of Silver Nanoparticles and Silver Ions in Antibacterial Products and Environmental Waters via Cloud Point Extraction-Based Separation
Abstract
The rapid growth in commercial use of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) will inevitably increase silver exposure in the environment and the general population. As the fate and toxic effects of AgNPs is related to the Ag(+) released from AgNPs and the transformation of Ag(+) into AgNPs, it is of great importance to develop methods for speciation analysis of AgNPs and Ag(+). This study reports the use of Triton X-114-based cloud point extraction as an efficient separation approach for the speciation analysis of AgNPs and Ag(+) in antibacterial products and environmental waters. AgNPs were quantified by determining the Ag content in the Triton X-114-rich phase with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) after microwave digestion. The concentration of total Ag(+), which consists of the AgNP adsorbed, the matrix associated, and the freely dissolved, was obtained by subtracting the AgNP content from the total silver content that was determined by ICPMS after digestion. The limits of quantification (S/N = 10) for antibacterial products were 0.4 μg/kg and 0.2 μg/kg for AgNPs and total silver, respectively. The reliable quantification limit was 3 μg/kg for total Ag(+). The presence of Ag(+) at concentrations up to 2-fold that of AgNPs caused no effects on the determination of AgNPs. In the cloud point extraction of AgNPs in antibacterial products, the spiked recoveries of AgNPs were in the range of 71.7-103% while the extraction efficiencies of Ag(+) were in the range of 1.2-10%. The possible coextracted other silver containing nanoparticles in the cloud point extraction of AgNPs were distinguished by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM)- energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and UV-vis spectrum. Real sample analysis indicated that even though the manufacturers claimed nanosilver products, AgNPs were detected only in three of the six tested antibacterial products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kittler, S., Greulich, C., Diendorf, J., Köller, M., & Epple, M. (2010) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm100023p · Cited by 1,126
Cited by
Analysis of environmental nanoplastics: Progress and challenges
Cai, H., Xu, E. G., Du, F., Li, R., Liu, J., & Shi, H. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.128208 · Cited by 444
Self-citationEnvironmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues
Richardson, S. D. (2012) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac202903d · Cited by 323
Kang, F., Alvarez, P. J., & Zhu, D. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es403796x · Cited by 305
López-Serrano, A., Olivas, R. M., Landaluze, J. S., & Cámara, C. (2014) · Anal. Methods · doi:10.1039/c3ay40517f · Cited by 277
Characterization of Nanomaterials
Mudalige, T., Qu, H., Van Haute, D., Ansar, S. M., Paredes, A., & Ingle, T. (2019) · Nanomaterials for Food Applications · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814130-4.00011-7 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Chao, J.-B., Liu, J.-F., Yu, S.-J., Feng, Y.-D., Tan, Z.-Q., Liu, R., & Yin, Y.-G.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-08-09
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6875-6882
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2313255807
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.