The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metal–Organic-Framework-Based Tandem Molecular Sieves as a Dual Platform for Selective Microextraction and High-Resolution Gas Chromatographic Separation of n-Alkanes in Complex Matrixes
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) were employed to design tandem molecular sieves as a dual platform for selective solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and high-resolution gas chromatographic (GC) separation of target analytes in complex matrixes. An elegant combination of a ZIF-8-coated fiber for SPME with a ZIF-8-coated capillary for GC allows selective extraction and separation of n-alkanes from complex matrixes such as petroleum-based fuel and biological fluids. The proposed tandem ZIF-8 molecular sieves not only offered good enhancement factors from 235 (hexane) to 1212 (nonane), but also exhibited wide linearity with 3 orders of magnitude for the tested linear alkanes. The limits of detection for the linear alkanes ranged from 0.46 ng L(-1) (nonane) to 1.06 ng L(-1)(hexane). The relative standard deviations of retention time, peak area, peak height, and half peak width for five replicate determinations of the tested n-alkanes at 30 ng L(-1) were 0.02-0.26%, 1.9-8.6%, 1.4-6.0%, and 1.3-7.2%, respectively. The developed tandem ZIF-8 molecular sieves were further used for the determination of linear alkanes in petroleum-based fuel and human serum. The large diversity in structure and pore size allows various combinations of MOFs for designing an MOF-based tandem molecular sieve platform to achieve different selectivities in extraction and chromatographic separation and to solve headache problems in complex real sample analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Metal-organic frameworks with high capacity and selectivity for harmful gases
Britt, D., Tranchemontagne, D., & Yaghi, O. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804900105 · Cited by 958
Cited by
Gu, Z.-Y., Yang, C.-X., Chang, N., & Yan, X.-P. (2012) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar2002599 · Cited by 674
Self-citationMetal–Organic Frameworks for Food Safety
Wang, P.-L., Xie, L.-H., Joseph, E. A., Li, J.-R., Su, X.-O., & Zhou, H.-C. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00257 · Cited by 533
Nanoparticles: Synthesis, characteristics, and applications in analytical and other sciences
Sajid, M., & Płotka-Wasylka, J. (2020) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2020.104623 · Cited by 285
Mansbach, R. A., & Ferguson, A. L. (2015) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4914144 · Cited by 39
Laredo, G., Trejo-Zarraga, F., Jimenez-Cruz, F., & Garcia-Gutierrez, J. (2013) · Recent Patents on Chemical Engineering · doi:10.2174/2211334711205030001 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, N., Gu, Z.-Y., Wang, H.-F., & Yan, X.-P.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-08-22
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7094-7101
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2312952118
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.