The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium/Sulfur Cell Discharge Mechanism: An Original Approach for Intermediate Species Identification
Abstract
The lithium/sulfur battery is a promising electrochemical system that has a high theoretical capacity of 1675 mAh g(-1), but its discharge mechanism is well-known to be a complex multistep process. As the active material dissolves during cycling, this discharge mechanism was investigated through the electrolyte characterization. Using high-performance liquid chromatography, UV-visible absorption, and electron spin resonance spectroscopies, we investigated the electrolyte composition at different discharge potentials in a TEGDME-based electrolyte. In this study, we propose a possible mechanism for sulfur reduction consisting of three steps. Long polysulfide chains are produced during the first reduction step (2.4-2.2 V vs Li(+)/Li), such as S(8)(2-) and S(6)(2-), as evidenced by UV and HPLC data. The S(3)(•-) radical can also be found in solution because of a disproportionation reaction. S(4)(2-) is produced during the second reduction step (2.15-2.1 V vs Li(+)/Li), thus pointing out the gradual decrease of the polysulfide chain lengths. Finally, short polysulfide species, such as S(3)(2-), S(2)(2-), and S(2-), are produced at the end of the reduction process, i.e., between 2.1 and 1.9 V vs Li(+)/Li. The precipitation of the poorly soluble and insulating short polysulfide compounds was evidenced, thus leading to the positive electrode passivation and explaining the early end of discharge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Cited by
Song, J., Yu, Z., Gordin, M. L., & Wang, D. (2016) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03217 · Cited by 561
From lithium to sodium: Cell chemistry of room temperature sodium–air and sodium–sulfur batteries
Adelhelm, P., Hartmann, P., Bender, C. L., Busche, M., Eufinger, C., & Janek, J. (2015) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.105 · Cited by 478
Investigations of lithium–sulfur batteries using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
Cañas, N. A., Hirose, K., Pascucci, B., Wagner, N., Friedrich, K. A., & Hiesgen, R. (2013) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.101 · Cited by 415
Electron paramagnetic resonance imaging for real-time monitoring of Li-ion batteries
Sathiya, M., Leriche, J.-B., Salager, E., Gourier, D., Tarascon, J.-M., & Vezin, H. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7276 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Barchasz, C., Molton, F., Duboc, C., Leprêtre, J.-C., Patoux, S., & Alloin, F.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-04-20
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3973-3980
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2324000835
- Cited by
- 946
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.