The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly Selective Electrochemical Strategy for Monitoring of Cerebral Cu2+ Based on a Carbon Dot-TPEA Hybridized Surface
Abstract
Direct determination of cerebral metal ions in small volume biological samples is still the bottleneck for evaluating the roles that metal ions play in the physiological and pathological processes. In this work, selected copper ion (Cu(2+)) as a model, a facile and direct electrochemical method for detection of Cu(2+) has been developed on the basis of two new designed strategies: one is specific recognition molecule for Cu(2+)-AE-TPEA (N-(2-aminoethyl)-N,N',N'-tris(pyridine-2-yl-methyl)ethane-1,2-diamine); another is carbon dots (C-Dots) with high electrocatalytic activity. Based on the high affinity between TPEA and Cu(2+), the electrode assembled with C-Dot-TPEA hybridized nanocomposites shows high selectivity toward Cu(2+) over other metal ions, amino acids, and biological coexisting species, such as uric acid (UA), ascorbic acid (AA), and so on, which makes it possible to be used for determination of Cu(2+) in the complex brain system. By taking advantage of C-Dots, a dynamic linear range from 1 μM to 60 μM is first achieved with a detection limit of ∼100 nM in aCSF solution. In addition, the developed method with theoretical simplicity and less instrumental demands exhibits long-term stability and good reproducibility. As a result, the present strategy has been successfully applied in detection of cerebral Cu(2+) in normal rat brain and that followed by global cerebral ischemia, combined with in vivo microdialysis. The determined concentrations of Cu(2+) in the rat brain microdialysates by the present method are found to be identical to those obtained by the conventional ICP-AES method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Essentiality of copper in humans
Uauy, R., Olivares, M., & Gonzalez, M. (1998) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/67.5.952s · Cited by 1,052
Cited by
Glowing Graphene Quantum Dots and Carbon Dots: Properties, Syntheses, and Biological Applications
Zheng, X. T., Ananthanarayanan, A., Luo, K. Q., & Chen, P. (2015) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201402648 · Cited by 2,190
Review of Carbon and Graphene Quantum Dots for Sensing
Li, M., Chen, T., Gooding, J. J., & Liu, J. (2019) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.9b00514 · Cited by 991
Review on Carbon Dots and Their Applications
Tuerhong, M., XU, Y., & YIN, X.-B. (2017) · Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s1872-2040(16)60990-8 · Cited by 478
Shi, B., Su, Y., Zhang, L., Huang, M., Liu, R., & Zhao, S. (2016) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b01325 · Cited by 357
Electrochemical sensing based on carbon nanoparticles: A review
Asadian, E., Ghalkhani, M., & Shahrokhian, S. (2019) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.075 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Shao, X., Gu, H., Wang, Z., Chai, X., Tian, Y., & Shi, G.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-12-18
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 418-425
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2049681730
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.