The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ozone-Induced Dissociation: Elucidation of Double Bond Position within Mass-Selected Lipid Ions
Abstract
Ions formed from lipids during electrospray ionization of crude lipid extracts have been mass-selected within a quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer and allowed to react with ozone vapor. Gas-phase ion-molecule reactions between unsaturated lipid ions and ozone are found to yield two primary product ions for each carbon-carbon double bond within the molecule. The mass-to-charge ratios of these chemically induced fragments are diagnostic of the position of unsaturation within the precursor ion. This novel analytical technique, dubbed ozone-induced dissociation (OzID), can be applied both in series and in parallel with conventional collision-induced dissociation (CID) to provide near-complete structural assignment of unknown lipids within complex mixtures without prior fractionation or derivatization. In this study, OzID is applied to a suite of complex lipid extracts from sources including human lens, bovine kidney, and commercial olive oil, thus demonstrating the technique to be applicable to a broad range of lipid classes including both neutral and acidic glycerophospholipids, sphingomyelins, and triacylglycerols. Gas-phase ozonolysis reactions are also observed with different types of precursor ions including [M+H]+, [M+Li]+, [M+Na]+, and [M-H]-: in each case yielding fragmentation data that allow double bond position to be unambiguously assigned. Within the human lens lipid extract, three sphingomyelin regioisomers, namely SM(d18:0/15Z-24:1), SM(d18:0/17Z-24:1), and SM(d18:0/19Z-24:1), and a novel phosphatidylethanolamine alkyl ether, GPEtn(11Z-18:1e/9Z-18:1), are identified using a combination of CID and OzID. These discoveries demonstrate that lipid identification based on CID alone belies the natural structural diversity in lipid biochemistry and illustrate the potential of OzID as a complementary approach within automated, high-throughput lipid analysis protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lipids and cancer: Emerging roles in pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapeutic intervention
Butler, L. M., Perone, Y., Dehairs, J., Lupien, L. E., de Laat, V., Talebi, A., Loda, M., Kinlaw, W. B., & Swinnen, J. V. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.013 · Cited by 589
Apocryphal FADS2 activity promotes fatty acid diversification in cancer
Young, R. S. E., Bowman, A. P., Williams, E. D., Tousignant, K. D., Bidgood, C. L., Narreddula, V. R., Gupta, R., Marshall, D. L., Poad, B. L. J., Nelson, C. C., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108738 · Cited by 109
Self-citationHancock, S. E., Ailuri, R., Marshall, D. L., Brown, S. J., Saville, J. T., Narreddula, V. R., Boase, N. R., Poad, B. J., Trevitt, A. J., Willcox, M. P., et al. (2018) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.m086702 · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, M. C., Mitchell, T. W., Harman, D. G., Deeley, J. M., Nealon, J. R., & Blanksby, S. J.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-12-07
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 303-311
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2078394205
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.