The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Equilibrium Method for Continuous-Flow Cell Sorting Using Dielectrophoresis
Abstract
Separations represent a fundamental unit operation in biology and biotechnology. Commensurate with their importance is the diversity of methods that have been developed for performing them. One important class of separations are equilibrium gradient methods, wherein a medium with some type of spatial nonuniformity is combined with a force field to focus particles to equilibrium positions related to those particles' intrinsic properties. A second class of techniques that is nonequilibrium exploits labels to sort particles based upon their extrinsic properties. While equilibrium techniques such as iso-electric focusing (IEF) have become instrumental within analytical chemistry and proteomics, cell separations predominantly rely upon the second, label-based class of techniques, exemplified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS). To extend the equilibrium techniques available for separating cells, we demonstrate the first implementation of a new microfluidic equilibrium separation method, which we call isodielectric separation (IDS), for sorting cells based upon electrically distinguishable phenotypes. IDS is analogous to isoelectric focusing, except instead of separating amphoteric molecules in a pH gradient using electrophoresis, we separate cells and particles in an electrical conductivity gradient using dielectrophoresis. IDS leverages many of the advantages of microfluidics and equilibrium gradient separation methods to create a device that is continuous-flow, capable of parallel separations of multiple (>2) subpopulations from a heterogeneous background, and label-free. We demonstrate the separation of polystyrene beads based upon surface conductance as well as sorting nonviable from viable cells of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extra-Large-Pore Zeolites with Two-Dimensional Channels Formed by 14 and 12 Rings
Paillaud, J.-L., Harbuzaru, B., Patarin, J., & Bats, N. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098242 · Cited by 355
Cited by
Label-free cell separation and sorting in microfluidic systems
Gossett, D. R., Weaver, W. M., Mach, A. J., Hur, S. C., Tse, H. T. K., Lee, W., Amini, H., & Di Carlo, D. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3721-9 · Cited by 930
Particle separation and sorting in microfluidic devices: a review
Sajeesh, P., & Sen, A. K. (2014) · Microfluidics and Nanofluidics · doi:10.1007/s10404-013-1291-9 · Cited by 767
Microfluidics for cell separation
Bhagat, A. A. S., Bow, H., Hou, H. W., Tan, S. J., Han, J., & Lim, C. T. (2010) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-010-0611-4 · Cited by 632
Dielectrophoresis in microfluidics technology
Çetin, B., & Li, D. (2011) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.201100167 · Cited by 411
Microfluidics for medical diagnostics and biosensors
Rivet, C., Lee, H., Hirsch, A., Hamilton, S., & Lu, H. (2011) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2010.08.015 · Cited by 356
Dielectrophoresis for manipulation of micro/nano particles in microfluidic systems
Zhang, C., Khoshmanesh, K., Mitchell, A., & Kalantar-zadeh, K. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-009-2922-6 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Vahey, M. D., & Voldman, J.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-03-26
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3135-3143
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W1990331268
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.