The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of Extracellular H2O2 Released from Human Liver Cancer Cells Based on TiO2 Nanoneedles with Enhanced Electron Transfer of Cytochrome c
Abstract
The high conductive TiO(2) nanoneedles film is first employed as a support matrix for immobilizing model enzyme, cytochrome c (cyt c) to facilitate the electron transfer between redox enzymes and electrodes. Reversible and direct electron transfer of cyt c is successfully achieved at the nanostructured TiO(2) surface with the redox formal potential (E(0)') of 108.0 +/- 1.9 mV versus Ag|AgCl and heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant (k(s)) of 13.8 +/- 2.1 s(-1). Experimental data indicate that cyt c is stably immobilized onto the TiO(2) nanoneedles film and maintains inherent enzymatic activity toward H(2)O(2). On the basis of these results, the cyt c-TiO(2) nanocomposits film is capable of sensing H(2)O(2) at a suitable potential, 0.0 V (vs Ag|AgCl), where not only common anodic interferences like ascorbic acid, uric acid, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid but also a cathodic interference, O(2), are effectively avoided. Besides high selectivity, the present biosensor for H(2)O(2) shows broad dynamic range and low detection limit. These remarkable analytical advantages, as well as the characteristic of TiO(2) nanoneedles film such as high conductivity, biocompatibility, and facile ability to miniaturize establishes a novel approach to detection of extracellular H(2)O(2) released from human liver cancer cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reactive Oxygen Species and the Central Nervous System
Halliwell, B. (1992) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb10990.x · Cited by 2,947
Cited by
New Horizons for Diagnostics and Therapeutic Applications of Graphene and Graphene Oxide
Feng, L., Wu, L., & Qu, X. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201203229 · Cited by 632
Metal oxide nanoparticles in electrochemical sensing and biosensing: a review
George, J. M., Antony, A., & Mathew, B. (2018) · Microchimica Acta · doi:10.1007/s00604-018-2894-3 · Cited by 580
Wang, T., Zhu, H., Zhuo, J., Zhu, Z., Papakonstantinou, P., Lubarsky, G., Lin, J., & Li, M. (2013) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac402114c · Cited by 462
Wang, L., Xie, S., Wang, Z., Liu, F., Yang, Y., Tang, C., Wu, X., Liu, P., Li, Y., Saiyin, H., et al. (2019) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-019-0462-8 · Cited by 384
Bai, J., & Jiang, X. (2013) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac400659u · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, Y., Liu, H., Rui, Q., & Tian, Y.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-03-16
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3035-3041
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2030203964
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.