The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Dynamic Exclusion Duration on Spectral Count Based Quantitative Proteomics
Abstract
To increase proteome coverage, dynamic exclusion (DE) is a widely used tool. When DE is enabled, more proteins can be identified, although the total spectral counts will decrease. To investigate the effects of DE duration on spectral-counting based quantitative proteomics, we analyzed the same sample via multidimensional protein identification technology while enabling different DE durations (15, 60, 90, 300, 600 s) or turning DE off. Normalized spectral abundance factors (NSAFs) measured for abundant proteins varied little with or without DE, while enabling DE lead to higher peptide counts, higher NSAFs, and better reproducibility of detection for proteins of relatively lower abundance. The optimal DE duration, which generated the maximum number of peptides, proteins, and peptides per protein, was observed to be 90 s in our settings. We developed a mathematical model for analyzing the effects of DE duration on peptide spectral counts. We found that the optimal DE duration depends on the average chromatographic peak width at the base of eluting peptides and mass spectrometry parameters, leading us to calculate an optimized DE duration of 97.9 s, in excellent agreement with our observations. In this study, we provide a systematic approach for the optimization of spectral counts for improved quantitative proteomics analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316801 · Cited by 7,344
Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X., & Marcotte, E. M. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1270 · Cited by 1,139
Significance Analysis of Spectral Count Data in Label-free Shotgun Proteomics
Choi, H., Fermin, D., & Nesvizhskii, A. I. (2008) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m800203-mcp200 · Cited by 364
Cited by
Rexroth, S., Mullineaux, C. W., Ellinger, D., Sendtko, E., Rögner, M., & Koenig, F. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.111.085779 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Wen, Z., Washburn, M. P., & Florens, L.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-07-08
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 6317-6326
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2036247643
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Dynamic Exclusion Duration on Spectral Count Based Quantitative Proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac9004887
- The paper
- Zhang, Y., Wen, Z., Washburn, M. P., & Florens, L. (2009). Effect of Dynamic Exclusion Duration on Spectral Count Based Quantitative Proteomics. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9004887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.