The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MOF-5 Metal−Organic Framework as Sorbent for In-Field Sampling and Preconcentration in Combination with Thermal Desorption GC/MS for Determination of Atmospheric Formaldehyde
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are one kind of highly porous crystalline materials, which are constructed by metal-containing inorganic nodes and organic linkers. With large surface area and high thermal stability, MOFs have great potential as sorbents for the preconcentration of trace analytes. However, such application of MOFs to the analysis of real samples has not been reported before. Here we report the utilization of MOF-5 as sorbent for in-field sampling and preconcentration of atmospheric formaldehyde before thermal desorption (TD) GC/MS (TD-GC/MS) determination without the need for any chemical derivatization. MOF-5 gave a 53 and 73 times better concentration effect than Tenax TA (organic polymers) and Carbograph 1TD (graphitized carbon black), respectively, for TD-GC/MS determination of formaldehyde. MOF-5 showed good performance for in-field sampling and preconcentration of formaldehyde from air samples with a relative humidity less than 45%. The collected formaldehyde on MOF-5 sorbent was stable for at least 72 h at room temperature before TD-GC/MS analysis. One tube packed with 300 mg of MOF-5 lasted 200 cycles of adsorption/TD without significant loss of collection efficiency. The breakthrough volume of such a tube was 1.2 L of 28.35 mg m(-3) formaldehyde at a sampling flow rate of 100 mL min(-1). The use of MOF-5 for in-field sampling and preconcentration in combination with TD-GC/MS for the determination of formaldehyde offered a linear range covering 3 orders of magnitude, and a detection limit of 0.6 microg m(-3). The precision for six replicate cycles of in-field sampling and preconcentration for TD-GC/MS determination using one 300 mg MOF-5 packed tube ranged from 2.8% to 5.3%. The tube-to-tube reproducibility of three MOF-5 tubes prepared in parallel was 7.7%. The developed method was applied to analysis of local indoor and outdoor air samples for formaldehyde and validated by the standard method TO-11A of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The concentration of formaldehyde and the recovery of spiked formaldehyde in the air samples ranged from 12 to 48 microg m(-3), and from 93% to 107%, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Metal-organic frameworks with high capacity and selectivity for harmful gases
Britt, D., Tranchemontagne, D., & Yaghi, O. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804900105 · Cited by 958
Cogliano, V. J., Grosse, Y., Baan, R. A., Straif, K., Secretan, M. B., Ghissassi, F. E., & the Working Group for Volume 88 (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7542 · Cited by 375
Cited by
Water adsorption in MOFs: fundamentals and applications
Canivet, J., Fateeva, A., Guo, Y., Coasne, B., & Farrusseng, D. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00078a · Cited by 1,444
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Air Purification of Toxic Chemicals
DeCoste, J. B., & Peterson, G. W. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr4006473 · Cited by 958
Gu, Z.-Y., Yang, C.-X., Chang, N., & Yan, X.-P. (2012) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar2002599 · Cited by 674
Self-citationYounas, M., Rezakazemi, M., Daud, M., Wazir, M. B., Ahmad, S., Ullah, N., Inamuddin, & Ramakrishna, S. (2020) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100849 · Cited by 421
Liu, Y. L., Zhao, X. J., Yang, X. X., & Li, Y. F. (2013) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/c3an00560g · Cited by 320
Wang, T., Zhao, P., Lu, N., Chen, H., Zhang, C., & Hou, X. (2016) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.016 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, Z.-Y., Wang, G., & Yan, X.-P.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-01-22
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1365-1370
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2095123472
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.