Cited by 212Analytical chemistry methods developmentEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry StudiesAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography

Quantitative Analysis of Fuel-Related Hydrocarbons in Surface Water and Wastewater Samples by Solid-Phase Microextraction

Langenfeld, John J., Hawthorne, Steven B., Miller, David J.·1996·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) parameters were examined on water contaminated with hydrocarbons including benzene and alkylbenzenes, n-alkanes, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Absorption equilibration times ranged from several minutes for low molecular weight compounds such as benzene to 5 h for high molecular weight compounds such as benzo[a]pyrene. Under equilibrium conditions, SPME analysis with GC/FID was linear over 3-6 orders of magnitude, with linear correlation coefficients (r(2)) greater than 0.96. Experimentally determined FID detection limits ranged from ∼30 ppt (w/w hydrocarbon/sample water) for high molecular weight PAHs (e.g., MW > 202) to ∼1 ppb for low molecular weight aromatic hydrocarbons. Experimental distribution constants (K) were different with 100- and 7-μm poly(dimethylsiloxane) fibers, and poor correlations with previously published values suggest that K depends on the fiber coating thickness and the sorbent preparation method. The sensitivity of SPME analysis is not significantly enhanced by larger sample volumes, since increasing the water volume (e.g., from 1 to 100 mL) has little effect on the number of analyte molecules absorbed by the fiber, especially for compounds with K < 500. Water sample storage should utilize silanized glassware, since hydrocarbon losses up to 70% could be attributed to unsilanized glassware walls when samples were stored for 48 h. Hydrocarbon losses at part-per-billion concentrations also occurred with su…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ac950862w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langenfeld, J. J., Hawthorne, S. B., & Miller, D. J.
Affiliations
University of North Dakota (US)
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
144-155
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2051619517
Cited by
212
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
21.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Keywords
solid-phase microextraction, hydrocarbon contamination, surface water, wastewater, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, benzene, alkylbenzenes, n-alkanes, benzo[a]pyrene, distribution constants, suspended solids, coal gasification wastewater, creosote contamination, deuterated internal standards, standard addition calibration, methylene chloride extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review