The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mapping of Phosphorylation Sites of Gel-Isolated Proteins by Nanoelectrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Potentials and Limitations
Abstract
Precursor ion scans have proven to be extremely useful for the characterization of unseparated peptide mixtures. In conjunction with the nanoelectrospray source, precursor ion scans provide a sensitive tool for the detection of posttranslationally modified peptides and have been used to determine phosphorylation sites of proteins digested in solution. In this report, we extend our previous work to the determination of protein phosphorylation sites of gel-isolated proteins. The in-gel digestion procedure developed in our laboratory for protein microsequencing was found to be suitable for phosphorylation mapping as well. The risk of losing hydrophilic peptides in the desalting step was decreased by using column packing material designed for the purification of oligonucleotides and by adjusting the pH conditions to the needs of phosphopeptide analysis. With this method, the tryptic phosphopeptides of beta-casein were detected after in-gel digestion at a sensitivity of 250 fmol of protein applied to the gel. The phosphorylation sites of two other proteins, Src-delta U and Op18, have similarly been mapped. Subpicomole to low-picomole amounts of protein starting material are needed in general, although we and others have reported attomole sensitivity for the detection of model phosphopeptides using precursor ion scans. This indicates that the success in determining phosphorylation sites depends crucially on the digestion, extraction, and detection efficiency for individual phosphopeptides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Proteomics to study genes and genomes
Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35015709 · Cited by 2,373
Self-citationProteomics: quantitative and physical mapping of cellular proteins
Blackstock, W. P., & Weir, M. P. (1999) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(98)01245-1 · Cited by 873
Immobilized Gallium(III) Affinity Chromatography of Phosphopeptides
Posewitz, M. C., & Tempst, P. (1999) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac981409y · Cited by 832
Interpreting the protein language using proteomics
Jensen, O. N. (2006) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1939 · Cited by 502
Mitotic Regulation of the APC Activator Proteins CDC20 and CDH1
Kramer, E. R., Scheuringer, N., Podtelejnikov, A. V., Mann, M., & Peters, J.-M. (2000) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.11.5.1555 · Cited by 455
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Neubauer, G., & Mann, M.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-12-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 235-242
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2032318346
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping of Phosphorylation Sites of Gel-Isolated Proteins by Nanoelectrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Potentials and Limitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac9804902
- The paper
- Neubauer, G., & Mann, M. (1999). Mapping of Phosphorylation Sites of Gel-Isolated Proteins by Nanoelectrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Potentials and Limitations. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9804902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.