The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ESI/Ion Trap/Ion Mobility/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Rapid and Sensitive Analysis of Biomolecular Mixtures
Abstract
An ion trap/ion mobility/time-of-flight mass spectrometry technique is shown to be a rapid and sensitive means of analyzing peptide/protein mixtures. In this approach, an ion trap is used to accumulate ions that have been electrosprayed from a mixture into concentrated packets. The ion packets are injected into a drift tube where components of the mixture are separated based on differences in mobility through a buffer gas. Ions that exit the drift tube are dispersed in a time-of-flight mass spectrometer for mass-to-charge (m/z) determination. The gas-phase separation strategy reduces congestion in the mass spectrum, and experimental mobilities complement m/z measurements in assigning peaks. Examples of the application of the approach to identification of peptides (from tryptic digests) and to separation of charge-state distributions from electrospray of a mixture containing ubiquitin and myoglobin are presented. Most peptides that are observed from tryptic digests of proteins such as cytochrome c and myoglobin can be identified from data that are acquired in under 1 min; studies of mixtures with known compositions indicate that detection limits are approximately 0.5-3 pmol for individual components. Factors that may influence the distributions that are observed, such as storage time in the trap, injection voltages used for the mobility experiment, and variations in ion cross section with charge state, are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Ion/Ion Reactions in the Gas Phase: Proton Transfer Reactions Involving Multiply-Charged Proteins
Stephenson, J. L., & McLuckey, S. A. (1996) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9611755 · Cited by 215
Cited by
Recommendations for reporting ion mobility Mass Spectrometry measurements
Gabelica, V., Shvartsburg, A. A., Afonso, C., Barran, P., Benesch, J. L. P., Bleiholder, C., Bowers, M. T., Bilbao, A., Bush, M. F., Campbell, J. L., et al. (2019) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21585 · Cited by 493
Self-citationProtein Complexes in the Gas Phase: Technology for Structural Genomics and Proteomics
Benesch, J. L. P., Ruotolo, B. T., Simmons, D. A., & Robinson, C. V. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068289b · Cited by 408
Lapthorn, C., Pullen, F., & Chowdhry, B. Z. (2013) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21349 · Cited by 398
Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Principles and Applications
Borsdorf, H., & Eiceman, G. A. (2006) · Applied Spectroscopy Reviews · doi:10.1080/05704920600663469 · Cited by 395
Trapped ion mobility spectrometry: A short review
Ridgeway, M. E., Lubeck, M., Jordens, J., Mann, M., & Park, M. A. (2018) · International Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2018.01.006 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, S. C., Valentine, S. J., Counterman, A. E., & Clemmer, D. E.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-12-10
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 291-301
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2092612030
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.