The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Automated In-Tube Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with Liquid Chromatography/Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of β-Blockers and Metabolites in Urine and Serum Samples
Abstract
The technique of automated in-tube solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS) was evaluated for the determination of beta-blockers in urine and serum samples. In-tube SPME is an extraction technique for organic compounds in aqueous samples, in which analytes are extracted from the sample directly into an open tubular capillary by repeated draw/eject cycles of sample solution. LC/MS analyses of beta-blockers were initially performed by liquid injection onto a LC column. Nine beta-blockers tested in this study gave very simple ESI mass spectra, and strong signals corresponding to [M + H]+ were observed for all beta-blockers. The beta-blockers were separated with a Hypersil BDS C18 column using acetonitrile/methanol/water/acetic acid (15:15:70:1) as a mobile phase. To optimize the extraction of beta-blockers, several in-tube SPME parameters were examined. The optimum extraction conditions were 15 draw/eject cycles of 30 microL of sample in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5) at a flow rate of 100 microL/min using an Omegawax 250 capillary (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA). The beta-blockers extracted by the capillary were easily desorbed by mobile-phase flow, and carryover of beta-blockers was not observed. Using in-tube SPME/LC/ESI-MS with selected ion monitoring, the calibration curves of beta-blockers were linear in the range from 2 to 100 ng/mL with correlation coefficients above 0.9982 (n = 18) and detection limits (S/N = 3) of 0.1-1.2 ng/mL. This method was successfully applied to the analysis of biological samples without interference peaks. The recoveries of beta-blockers spiked into human urine and serum samples were above 84 and 71%, respectively. A serum sample from a patient administrated propranolol was analyzed using this method and both propranolol and its metabolites were detected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Applications of solid-phase microextraction in food analysis
Kataoka, H., Lord, H. L., & Pawliszyn, J. (2000) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00309-5 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationEvolution of solid-phase microextraction technology
Lord, H., & Pawliszyn, J. (2000) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00535-5 · Cited by 787
Self-citationLord, H., & Pawliszyn, J. (2000) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00836-0 · Cited by 468
Self-citationSolid-phase microextraction in biomedical analysis
Ulrich, S. (2000) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00934-1 · Cited by 375
New trends in sample preparation for clinical and pharmaceutical analysis
Kataoka, H. (2003) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0165-9936(03)00402-3 · Cited by 261
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kataoka, H., Narimatsu, S., Lord, H. L., & Pawliszyn, J.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-09-03
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4237-4244
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2057729420
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated In-Tube Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with Liquid Chromatography/Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of β-Blockers and Metabolites in Urine and Serum Samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ac990356x
- The paper
- Kataoka, H., Narimatsu, S., Lord, H. L., & Pawliszyn, J. (1999). Automated In-Tube Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled with Liquid Chromatography/Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry for the Determination of β-Blockers and Metabolites in Urine and Serum Samples. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac990356x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.