Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 743

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Electrical Doping of Organic Semiconductors: Fundamental Mechanisms and Emerging Dopant Design Rules

Open access
Salzmann, Ingo, Heimel, Georg, Oehzelt, Martin, Winkler, Stefanie, Koch, Norbert·2016·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

Today's information society depends on our ability to controllably dope inorganic semiconductors, such as silicon, thereby tuning their electrical properties to application-specific demands. For optoelectronic devices, organic semiconductors, that is, conjugated polymers and molecules, have emerged as superior alternative owing to the ease of tuning their optical gap through chemical variability and their potential for low-cost, large-area processing on flexible substrates. There, the potential of molecular electrical doping for improving the performance of, for example, organic light-emitting devices or organic solar cells has only recently been established. The doping efficiency, however, remains conspicuously low, highlighting the fact that the underlying mechanisms of molecular doping in organic semiconductors are only little understood compared with their inorganic counterparts. Here, we review the broad range of phenomena observed upon molecularly doping organic semiconductors and identify two distinctly different scenarios: the pairwise formation of both organic semiconductor and dopant ions on one hand and the emergence of ground state charge transfer complexes between organic semiconductor and dopant through supramolecular hybridization of their respective frontier molecular orbitals on the other hand. Evidence for the occurrence of these two scenarios is subsequently discussed on the basis of the characteristic and strikingly different signatures of the individual species involved in the respective doping processes in a variety of spectroscopic techniques. The critical importance of a statistical view of doping, rather than a bimolecular picture, is then highlighted by employing numerical simulations, which reveal one of the main differences between inorganic and organic semiconductors to be their respective density of electronic states and the doping induced changes thereof. Engineering the density of states of doped organic semiconductors, the Fermi-Dirac occupation of which ultimately determines the doping efficiency, thus emerges as key challenge. As a first step, the formation of charge transfer complexes is identified as being detrimental to the doping efficiency, which suggests sterically shielding the functional core of dopant molecules as an additional design rule to complement the requirement of low ionization energies or high electron affinities in efficient n-type or p-type dopants, respectively. In an extended outlook, we finally argue that, to fully meet this challenge, an improved understanding is required of just how the admixture of dopant molecules to organic semiconductors does affect the density of states: compared with their inorganic counterparts, traps for charge carriers are omnipresent in organic semiconductors due to structural and chemical imperfections, and Coulomb attraction between ionized dopants and free charge carriers is typically stronger in organic semiconductors owing to their lower dielectric constant. Nevertheless, encouraging progress is being made toward developing a unifying picture that captures the entire range of doping induced phenomena, from ion-pair to complex formation, in both conjugated polymers and molecules. Once completed, such a picture will provide viable guidelines for synthetic and supramolecular chemistry that will enable further technological advances in organic and hybrid organic/inorganic devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00438

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 743

Metadata

Authors
Salzmann, I., Heimel, G., Oehzelt, M., Winkler, S., & Koch, N.
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2016-02-08
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
370-378
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W2271606783
Cited by
743
References
2
FWCI
30.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Electrical Doping of Organic Semiconductors: Fundamental Mechanisms and Emerging Dopant Design Rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00438
The paper
Salzmann, I., Heimel, G., Oehzelt, M., Winkler, S., & Koch, N. (2016). Molecular Electrical Doping of Organic Semiconductors: Fundamental Mechanisms and Emerging Dopant Design Rules. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00438

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.