The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Electrical Doping of Organic Semiconductors: Fundamental Mechanisms and Emerging Dopant Design Rules
Open accessAbstract
Today's information society depends on our ability to controllably dope inorganic semiconductors, such as silicon, thereby tuning their electrical properties to application-specific demands. For optoelectronic devices, organic semiconductors, that is, conjugated polymers and molecules, have emerged as superior alternative owing to the ease of tuning their optical gap through chemical variability and their potential for low-cost, large-area processing on flexible substrates. There, the potential of molecular electrical doping for improving the performance of, for example, organic light-emitting devices or organic solar cells has only recently been established. The doping efficiency, however, remains conspicuously low, highlighting the fact that the underlying mechanisms of molecular doping in organic semiconductors are only little understood compared with their inorganic counterparts. Here, we review the broad range of phenomena observed upon molecularly doping organic semiconductors and identify two distinctly different scenarios: the pairwise formation of both organic semiconductor and dopant ions on one hand and the emergence of ground state charge transfer complexes between organic semiconductor and dopant through supramolecular hybridization of their respective frontier molecular orbitals on the other hand. Evidence for the occurrence of these two scenarios is subsequently discussed on the basis of the characteristic and strikingly different signatures of the individual species involved in the respective doping processes in a variety of spectroscopic techniques. The critical importance of a statistical view of doping, rather than a bimolecular picture, is then highlighted by employing numerical simulations, which reveal one of the main differences between inorganic and organic semiconductors to be their respective density of electronic states and the doping induced changes thereof. Engineering the density of states of doped organic semiconductors, the Fermi-Dirac occupation of which ultimately determines the doping efficiency, thus emerges as key challenge. As a first step, the formation of charge transfer complexes is identified as being detrimental to the doping efficiency, which suggests sterically shielding the functional core of dopant molecules as an additional design rule to complement the requirement of low ionization energies or high electron affinities in efficient n-type or p-type dopants, respectively. In an extended outlook, we finally argue that, to fully meet this challenge, an improved understanding is required of just how the admixture of dopant molecules to organic semiconductors does affect the density of states: compared with their inorganic counterparts, traps for charge carriers are omnipresent in organic semiconductors due to structural and chemical imperfections, and Coulomb attraction between ionized dopants and free charge carriers is typically stronger in organic semiconductors owing to their lower dielectric constant. Nevertheless, encouraging progress is being made toward developing a unifying picture that captures the entire range of doping induced phenomena, from ion-pair to complex formation, in both conjugated polymers and molecules. Once completed, such a picture will provide viable guidelines for synthetic and supramolecular chemistry that will enable further technological advances in organic and hybrid organic/inorganic devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physics of Semiconductor Devices
Sze, S. M., & Ng, K. K. (2006) · doi:10.1002/0470068329 · Cited by 14,627
Synthesis of electrically conducting organic polymers: halogen derivatives of polyacetylene, (CH) x
Shirakawa, H., Louis, E. J., MacDiarmid, A. G., Chiang, C. K., & Heeger, A. J. (1977) · Journal of the Chemical Society, Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c39770000578 · Cited by 3,867
Cited by
Recent Progress in High‐Mobility Organic Transistors: A Reality Check
Paterson, A. F., Singh, S., Fallon, K. J., Hodsden, T., Han, Y., Schroeder, B. C., Bronstein, H., Heeney, M., McCulloch, I., & Anthopoulos, T. D. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801079 · Cited by 641
Recent advances in organic light-emitting diodes: toward smart lighting and displays
Zou, S.-J., Shen, Y., Xie, F.-M., Chen, J.-D., Li, Y.-Q., & Tang, J.-X. (2020) · Materials Chemistry Frontiers · doi:10.1039/c9qm00716d · Cited by 607
Controlling Molecular Doping in Organic Semiconductors
Jacobs, I. E., & Moulé, A. J. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201703063 · Cited by 572
Efficient molecular doping of polymeric semiconductors driven by anion exchange
Yamashita, Y., Tsurumi, J., Ohno, M., Fujimoto, R., Kumagai, S., Kurosawa, T., Okamoto, T., Takeya, J., & Watanabe, S. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1504-9 · Cited by 361
Morphology controls the thermoelectric power factor of a doped semiconducting polymer
Patel, S. N., Glaudell, A. M., Peterson, K. A., Thomas, E. M., O’Hara, K. A., Lim, E., & Chabinyc, M. L. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700434 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Salzmann, I., Heimel, G., Oehzelt, M., Winkler, S., & Koch, N.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-02-08
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 370-378
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2271606783
- Cited by
- 743
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 30.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Electrical Doping of Organic Semiconductors: Fundamental Mechanisms and Emerging Dopant Design Rules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00438
- The paper
- Salzmann, I., Heimel, G., Oehzelt, M., Winkler, S., & Koch, N. (2016). Molecular Electrical Doping of Organic Semiconductors: Fundamental Mechanisms and Emerging Dopant Design Rules. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.