The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Poly(ionic liquid)/Ionic Liquid Ion-Gels with High “Free” Ionic Liquid Content: Platform Membrane Materials for CO2/Light Gas Separations
Abstract
The recycling or sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the waste gas of fossil-fuel power plants is widely acknowledged as one of the most realistic strategies for delaying or avoiding the severest environmental, economic, political, and social consequences that will result from global climate change and ocean acidification. For context, in 2013 coal and natural gas power plants accounted for roughly 31% of total U.S. CO2 emissions. Recycling or sequestering this CO2 would reduce U.S. emissions by ca. 1800 million metric tons-easily meeting the U.S.'s currently stated CO2 reduction targets of ca. 17% relative to 2005 levels by 2020. This situation is similar for many developed and developing nations, many of which officially target a 20% reduction relative to 1990 baseline levels by 2020. To make CO2 recycling or sequestration processes technologically and economically viable, the CO2 must first be separated from the rest of the waste gas mixture-which is comprised mostly of nitrogen gas and water (ca. 85%). Of the many potential separation technologies available, membrane technology is particularly attractive due to its low energy operating cost, low maintenance, smaller equipment footprint, and relatively facile retrofit integration with existing power plant designs. From a techno-economic standpoint, the separation of CO2 from flue gas requires membranes that can process extremely high amounts of CO2 over a short time period, a property defined as the membrane "permeance". In contrast, the membrane's CO2/N2 selectivity has only a minor effect on the overall cost of some separation processes once a threshold permeability selectivity of ca. 20 is reached. Given the above criteria, the critical properties when developing membrane materials for postcombustion CO2 separation are CO2 permeability (i.e., the rate of CO2 transport normalized to the material thickness), a reasonable CO2/N2 selectivity (≥20), and the ability to be processed into defect-free thin-films (ca. 100-nm-thick active layer). Traditional polymeric membrane materials are limited by a trade-off between permeability and selectivity empirically described by the "Robeson upper bound"-placing the desired membrane properties beyond reach. Therefore, the investigation of advanced and composite materials that can overcome the limitations of traditional polymeric materials is the focus of significant academic and industrial research. In particular, there has been substantial work on ionic-liquid (IL)-based materials due to their gas transport properties. This review provides an overview of our collaborative work on developing poly(ionic liquid)/ionic liquid (PIL/IL) ion-gel membrane technology. We detail developmental work on the preparation of PIL/IL composites and describe how this chemical technology was adapted to allow the roll-to-roll processing and preparation of membranes with defect-free active layers ca. 100 nm thick, CO2 permeances of over 6000 GPU, and CO2/N2 selectivity of ≥20-properties with the potential to reduce the cost of CO2 removal from coal-fired power plant flue gas to ca. $15 per ton of CO2 captured. Additionally, we examine the materials developments that have produced advanced PIL/IL composite membranes. These advancements include cross-linked PIL/IL blends, step-growth PIL/IL networks with facilitated transport groups, and PIL/IL composites with microporous additives for CO2/CH4 separations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biological Activity of Ionic Liquids and Their Application in Pharmaceutics and Medicine
Egorova, K. S., Gordeev, E. G., & Ananikov, V. P. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00562 · Cited by 1,649
Peng, H., & Zhao, Q. (2021) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202009430 · Cited by 389
Zhang, S.-Y., Zhuang, Q., Zhang, M., Wang, H., Gao, Z., Sun, J.-K., & Yuan, J. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00938d · Cited by 384
Xie, K., Fu, Q., Qiao, G. G., & Webley, P. A. (2019) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.049 · Cited by 308
Counter-Anion Tuning of Aqueous Carboxylate Recognition by Imidazolium Poly(Ionic Liquids)
Shinde, S., McClure, A., & Manesiotis, P. (2026) · ACS Applied Polymer Materials · doi:10.1021/acsapm.6c01428
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowan, M. G., Gin, D. L., & Noble, R. D.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-04-05
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 724-732
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2327064955
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poly(ionic liquid)/Ionic Liquid Ion-Gels with High “Free” Ionic Liquid Content: Platform Membrane Materials for CO2/Light Gas Separations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00547
- The paper
- Cowan, M. G., Gin, D. L., & Noble, R. D. (2016). Poly(ionic liquid)/Ionic Liquid Ion-Gels with High “Free” Ionic Liquid Content: Platform Membrane Materials for CO2/Light Gas Separations. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00547
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.