The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are Graphitic Surfaces Hydrophobic?
Abstract
Conspectus Graphitic carbons are important solid materials with myriad applications including electrodes, adsorbents, catalyst support, and solid lubricants. Understanding the interaction between water and graphitic carbons is critically important for both fundamental material characterization and practical device fabrication because the water–graphitic interface is essential to many applications. Research interests in graphene and carbon nanotubes over the past decades have brought renewed interest to elucidate wettability of graphitic carbons and understand their interaction with the surrounding environment. Research on this topic can be traced back to the 1940s, and the prevailing notion has been that graphitic carbons are hydrophobic. Though there have been different voices, this conclusion is supported by many previous water contact angle tests and well accepted by the community since sp 2 carbon is nonpolar in nature. However, recent results from our groups showed that graphitic surfaces are intrinsically mildly hydrophilic and adsorbed hydrocarbon contaminants from the ambient air render the surface hydrophobic. This unexpected finding challenges the long-lasting conception and could completely change the way graphitic materials are made, modeled, and modified. With several other research groups reporting similar findings, it is important for the community to realize the importance of airborne contamination on the surface-related properties of graphitic materials and revisit the intrinsic water–graphite interaction. This Account aims to summarize our recent work on water wettability of graphitic surfaces and discuss future research directions toward understanding the intrinsic water–graphite interaction. Historical perspective will first be provided highlighting the long accepted notion that graphite is hydrophobic along with a few reports suggesting otherwise. Next, our recent experimental data will be presented showing that pristine graphene and graphite are mildly hydrophilic; chemical analysis showed that hydrocarbons adsorb onto the clean surfaces thus rendering them hydrophobic. These results are further rationalized by analyzing the change in surface energy of the graphitic surfaces before and after hydrocarbon contamination. Facile methods to remove hydrocarbons from a contaminated surface will be discussed along with a convenient water treatment method that we developed to inhibit hydrocarbon adsorption onto a pristine graphitic surface. Implications of contamination will be illustrated through comparing the electrochemical activity of pristine and contaminated graphite. Lastly, consequences of these findings and future research directions to address a few important unanswered questions will be discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Xiao, X., Chen, B., Chen, Z., Zhu, L., & Schnoor, J. L. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b06487 · Cited by 914
Umair, M. M., Zhang, Y., Iqbal, K., Zhang, S., & Tang, B. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.017 · Cited by 852
Wu, C., Wang, Z., Liang, L., Gui, T., Zhong, W., Du, R., Xie, C., Wang, L., & Luo, L. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201900730 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozbial, A., Zhou, F., Li, Z., Liu, H., & Li, L.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-12-09
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2765-2773
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2560691439
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are Graphitic Surfaces Hydrophobic? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00447
- The paper
- Kozbial, A., Zhou, F., Li, Z., Liu, H., & Li, L. (2016). Are Graphitic Surfaces Hydrophobic? Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.