The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations
Abstract
A principal goal of drug discovery project is to design molecules that can tightly and selectively bind to the target protein receptor. Accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding free energies is therefore of central importance in computational chemistry and computer aided drug design. Multiple recent improvements in computing power, classical force field accuracy, enhanced sampling methods, and simulation setup have enabled accurate and reliable calculations of protein-ligands binding free energies, and position free energy calculations to play a guiding role in small molecule drug discovery. In this Account, we outline the relevant methodological advances, including the REST2 (Replica Exchange with Solute Temperting) enhanced sampling, the incorporation of REST2 sampling with convential FEP (Free Energy Perturbation) through FEP/REST, the OPLS3 force field, and the advanced simulation setup that constitute our FEP+ approach, followed by the presentation of extensive comparisons with experiment, demonstrating sufficient accuracy in potency prediction (better than 1 kcal/mol) to substantially impact lead optimization campaigns. The limitations of the current FEP+ implementation and best practices in drug discovery applications are also discussed followed by the future methodology development plans to address those limitations. We then report results from a recent drug discovery project, in which several thousand FEP+ calculations were successfully deployed to simultaneously optimize potency, selectivity, and solubility, illustrating the power of the approach to solve challenging drug design problems. The capabilities of free energy calculations to accurately predict potency and selectivity have led to the advance of ongoing drug discovery projects, in challenging situations where alternative approaches would have great difficulties. The ability to effectively carry out projects evaluating tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands, of proposed drug candidates, is potentially transformative in enabling hard to drug targets to be attacked, and in facilitating the development of superior compounds, in various dimensions, for a wide range of targets. More effective integration of FEP+ calculations into the drug discovery process will ensure that the results are deployed in an optimal fashion for yielding the best possible compounds entering the clinic; this is where the greatest payoff is in the exploitation of computer driven design capabilities. A key conclusion from the work described is the surprisingly robust and accurate results that are attainable within the conventional classical simulation, fixed charge paradigm. No doubt there are individual cases that would benefit from a more sophisticated energy model or dynamical treatment, and properties other than protein-ligand binding energies may be more sensitive to these approximations. We conclude that an inflection point in the ability of MD simulations to impact drug discovery has now been attained, due to the confluence of hardware and software development along with the formulation of "good enough" theoretical methods and models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, L., Wu, Y., Deng, Y., Kim, B., Pierce, L., Krilov, G., Lupyan, D., Robinson, S., Dahlgren, M. K., Greenwood, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja512751q · Cited by 1,313
Self-citation
Cited by
A Review on Applications of Computational Methods in Drug Screening and Design
Lin, X., Li, X., & Lin, X. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25061375 · Cited by 718
Potential of quantum computing for drug discovery
Cao, Y., Romero, J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2018) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2018.2888987 · Cited by 357
The transformational role of GPU computing and deep learning in drug discovery
Pandey, M., Fernandez, M., Gentile, F., Isayev, O., Tropsha, A., Stern, A. C., & Cherkasov, A. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00463-x · Cited by 255
Li, Z., Li, X., Huang, Y.-Y., Wu, Y., Liu, R., Zhou, L., Lin, Y., Wu, D., Zhang, L., Liu, H., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2010470117 · Cited by 255
The maximal and current accuracy of rigorous protein-ligand binding free energy calculations
Ross, G. A., Lu, C., Scarabelli, G., Albanese, S. K., Houang, E., Abel, R., Harder, E. D., & Wang, L. (2023) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-023-01019-9 · Cited by 178
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Abel, R., Wang, L., Harder, E. D., Berne, B. J., & Friesner, R. A.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-07-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1625-1632
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2730519791
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.