The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Insight into Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Stability and Interfacial Structure
Abstract
Electroactive interfaces distinguish electrochemistry from chemistry and enable electrochemical energy devices like batteries, fuel cells, and electric double layer capacitors. In batteries, electrolytes should be either thermodynamically stable at the electrode interfaces or kinetically stable by forming an electronically insulating but ionically conducting interphase. In addition to a traditional optimization of electrolytes by adding cosolvents and sacrificial additives to preferentially reduce or oxidize at the electrode surfaces, knowledge of the local electrolyte composition and structure within the double layer as a function of voltage constitutes the basis of manipulating an interphase and expanding the operating windows of electrochemical devices. In this work, we focus on how the molecular-scale insight into the solvent and ion partitioning in the electrolyte double layer as a function of applied potential could predict changes in electrolyte stability and its initial oxidation and reduction reactions. In molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, highly concentrated lithium aqueous and nonaqueous electrolytes were found to exclude the solvent molecules from directly interacting with the positive electrode surface, which provides an additional mechanism for extending the electrolyte oxidation stability in addition to the well-established simple elimination of "free" solvent at high salt concentrations. We demonstrate that depending on their chemical structures, the anions could be designed to preferentially adsorb or desorb from the positive electrode with increasing electrode potential. This provides additional leverage to dictate the order of anion oxidation and to effectively select a sacrificial anion for decomposition. The opposite electrosorption behaviors of bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide (TFSI) and trifluoromethanesulfonate (OTF) as predicted by MD simulation in highly concentrated aqueous electrolytes were confirmed by surface enhanced infrared spectroscopy. The proton transfer (H-transfer) reactions between solvent molecules on the cathode surface coupled with solvent oxidation were found to be ubiquitous for common Li-ion electrolyte components and dependent on the local molecular environment. Quantum chemistry (QC) calculations on the representative clusters showed that the majority of solvents such as carbonates, phosphates, sulfones, and ethers have significantly lower oxidation potential when oxidation is coupled with H-transfer, while without H-transfer their oxidation potentials reside well beyond battery operating potentials. Thus, screening of the solvent oxidation limits without considering H-transfer reactions is unlikely to be relevant, except for solvents containing unsaturated functionalities (such as C═C) that oxidize without H-transfer. On the anode, the F-transfer reaction and LiF formation during anion and fluorinated solvent reduction could be enhanced or diminished depending on salt and solvent partitioning in the double layer, again giving an additional tool to manipulate the order of reductive decompositions and interphase chemistry. Combined with experimental efforts, modeling results highlight the promise of interphasial compositional control by either bringing the desired components closer to the electrode surface to facilitate redox reaction or expelling them so that they are kinetically shielded from the potential of the electrode.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Self-citation“Water-in-salt” electrolyte enables high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion chemistries
Suo, L., Borodin, O., Gao, T., Olguin, M., Ho, J., Fan, X., Luo, C., Wang, C., & Xu, K. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab1595 · Cited by 3,821
Self-citation
Cited by
Review on modeling of the anode solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) for lithium-ion batteries
Wang, A., Kadam, S., Li, H., Shi, S., & Qi, Y. (2018) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-018-0064-0 · Cited by 1,639
Electrochemical potential window of battery electrolytes: the HOMO–LUMO misconception
Peljo, P., & Girault, H. H. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee01286e · Cited by 708
Hou, T., Yang, G., Rajput, N. N., Self, J., Park, S.-W., Nanda, J., & Persson, K. A. (2019) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103881 · Cited by 470
Critical effects of electrolyte recipes for Li and Na metal batteries
Zheng, X., Huang, L., Ye, X., Zhang, J., Min, F., Luo, W., & Huang, Y. (2021) · Chem · doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2021.02.025 · Cited by 367
Perspectives for restraining harsh lithium dendrite growth: Towards robust lithium metal anodes
Wu, F., Yuan, Y.-X., Cheng, X.-B., Bai, Y., Li, Y., Wu, C., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.024 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Borodin, O., Ren, X., Vatamanu, J., von Wald Cresce, A., Knap, J., & Xu, K.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-11-22
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2886-2894
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2769869433
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling Insight into Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Stability and Interfacial Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00486
- The paper
- Borodin, O., Ren, X., Vatamanu, J., von Wald Cresce, A., Knap, J., & Xu, K. (2017). Modeling Insight into Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Stability and Interfacial Structure. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00486
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.