The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural Self-Reconstruction of Catalysts in Electrocatalysis
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed significant development of electrocatalysis for clean energy and related potential technologies. The precise identification toward active sites of catalysts and the monitoring of product information are highly desirable to understand how the materials catalyze a specific electrocatalytic reaction. For a long period, the identification of active sites and the cognition of corresponding catalytic mechanisms are generally based on various ex situ characterization methods which actually could not capture dynamic structure and intermediate information during electrocatalytic processes. With recent developments of in situ and operando characterization techniques, it has been extensively observed that most of the catalysts would undergo structural self-reconstruction as a result of electro-derived oxidation or reduction process of the catalysts at a given potential, often accompanied by the increase or decrease of catalytic activity as well as the change of catalytic selectivity. In fact, such structural self-change in the catalytic process does make it difficult to identify the true catalytically active sites efficiently, thus hindering the understanding of the real catalytic mechanism. Therefore, we believe that understanding the self-reconstruction by the combination of reliable characterization techniques and theoretical calculations holds the key to rational design of advanced catalysts. In this Account, we provide in-depth insights into recent progress regarding structural self-reconstruction of electrocatalysts in several typical electrochemical reactions with the emphasis on fundamental knowledge, structure-property relationships, structural evolution process, and modulation of self-reconstruction. To deliver a clear understanding, it has to be pointed out in advance that these catalysts with drastic structural and activity self-change in electrocatalytic processes are suggested to be called precatalysts under nonreaction conditions. The restructured active components in realistic reaction conditions are true catalysts. The structural self-reconstruction process bridges the precatalysts with true catalysts. To understand the self-reconstruction behavior, the following three critical aspects will be carefully disclosed and discussed in depth. First, fundamental origin of structural self-reconstruction of electrocatalysts is introduced. It is noteworthy that the atomic-level correlations between the self-reconstruction behavior and intrinsic structure of precatalysts are emphasized due to the fact that even if some precatalysts are congeneric, they often exhibit a diverse self-reconstruction phenomenon and catalytic performance. Second, the self-reconstruction process should be monitored by advanced characterization techniques, which is central to precisely unveil the self-reconstruction behavior. In situ or operando characterizations have been considered as judicious methods to track the self-reconstruction, capture dynamic structure and analyze real-time reaction products. Finally, based on the dynamic structure and product information together with comprehensive theory calculations, the enhancement or degradation mechanism of catalytic activities can be unambiguously clarified. With thoughtful studies toward the complete self-reconstruction process of electrocatalysts, some feasible methods to tune the self-reconstruction and improve the performance can be rationally proposed. Based on this progress, we hope to provide new insight into electrocatalysis, particularly the self-reconstruction and true active sites of electrocatalysts, and then to offer guidelines for rational design of advanced electrocatalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future
Chu, S., & Majumdar, A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11475 · Cited by 12,550
Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design
Seh, Z. W., Kibsgaard, J., Dickens, C. F., Chorkendorff, I., Nørskov, J. K., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad4998 · Cited by 12,114
Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells
Debe, M. K. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11115 · Cited by 5,885
Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions
Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S. Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00470a · Cited by 5,388
Recent Advances in Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Shao, M., Chang, Q., Dodelet, J.-P., & Chenitz, R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462 · Cited by 3,903
Toward the rational design of non-precious transition metal oxides for oxygen electrocatalysis
Hong, W. T., Risch, M., Stoerzinger, K. A., Grimaud, A., Suntivich, J., & Shao-Horn, Y. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03869j · Cited by 2,089
Dopant-induced electron localization drives CO2 reduction to C2 hydrocarbons
Zhou, Y., Che, F., Liu, M., Zou, C., Liang, Z., De Luna, P., Yuan, H., Li, J., Wang, Z., Xie, H., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-018-0092-x · Cited by 1,171
De Luna, P., Quintero-Bermudez, R., Dinh, C.-T., Ross, M. B., Bushuyev, O. S., Todorović, P., Regier, T., Kelley, S. O., Yang, P., & Sargent, E. H. (2018) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-017-0018-9 · Cited by 1,046
Cited by
Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Overall and Hybrid Water Splitting
Quan, L., Jiang, H., Mei, G., Sun, Y., & You, B. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00332 · Cited by 874
Self-citationPu, Z., Liu, T., Amiinu, I. S., Cheng, R., Wang, P., Zhang, C., Ji, P., Hu, W., Liu, J., & Mu, S. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202004009 · Cited by 604
Fe-Based Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction: Progress and Perspectives
Feng, C., Faheem, M. B., Fu, J., Xiao, Y., Li, C., & Li, Y. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b05445 · Cited by 587
Approaching the activity limit of CoSe2 for oxygen evolution via Fe doping and Co vacancy
Dou, Y., He, C.-T., Zhang, L., Yin, H., Al-Mamun, M., Ma, J., & Zhao, H. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15498-0 · Cited by 311
Selvam, N. C. S., Du, L., Xia, B. Y., Yoo, P. J., & You, B. (2021) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202008190 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, H., He, Q., Zhang, Y., & Song, L.
- Venue
- Accounts of Chemical Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-10-30
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2968-2977
- ISSN
- 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4898
- OpenAlex
- W2898900627
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural Self-Reconstruction of Catalysts in Electrocatalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00449
- The paper
- Jiang, H., He, Q., Zhang, Y., & Song, L. (2018). Structural Self-Reconstruction of Catalysts in Electrocatalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.