Cited by 6Analytical chemistry methods developmentPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchIonic liquids properties and applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhancing the Separation and Quantification of Perfluoroalkyl Substances Using Polymeric Ionic Liquid Sorbents in Thin Film Microextraction

Abstract

The preconcentration and isolation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) remain challenging due to their varying chain lengths and diverse headgroup chemical functionalities. These substances are persistent and occur in the environment at low parts-per-trillion concentration levels, necessitating the use of efficient and selective sorbents that can enhance their preconcentration from the targeted sample prior to instrumental analysis. This study, for the first time, evaluates the use of a polymeric ionic liquid (PIL) consisting of 1-(9-carboxy-nonyl)-3-vinylimidazolium bromide [C 9 COOHVim + ] [Br – ] ionic liquid (IL) monomer and 1,12-di(3-vinylimidazolium)dodecane bromide ([C 12 (Vim + ) 2 ]2[Br – ]) IL cross-linker for the simultaneous separation and preconcentration of 15 anionic PFAS. The PIL was immobilized on a thin film microextraction device to improve preconcentration, extraction, and desorption kinetics. The addition of competing anions to the desorption solution was critical to ensure the quantitative desorption of the anionic PFAS by an ion exchange mechanism. Partition coefficient calculations revealed a balanced extraction coverage for short- and long-chain PFAS in ultrapure water, while in solutions at high ionic strength, short-chain PFAS tend to display less affinity for the sorbent compared to long-chain PFAS. Kinetic studies showed that less hydrophobic PFAS (perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA)–perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA)) reached equilibrium faster and the extraction followed a pseudo-second order model with r 2 values up to 0.9874. The applicability of the PIL-thin film microextraction (TFME) device for quantitative analysis was demonstrated by a calibration curve in a concentration range from 1 ng L –1 to 2500 ng L –1, which showed good accuracy (70–130%), precision (<20%), and limits of quantification from 1 ng L –1 to 50 ng L –1 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c06522

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.06.011 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.012 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/jssc.201000855 · DOI
  4. 10.1039/C9AY02073J · DOI
  5. 10.1021/ac034506m · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.aca.2016.06.014 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.03.063 · DOI
  8. 10.1021/jp212202b · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jes.2022.08.025 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115330 · DOI
  11. 10.1289/EHP6837 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.trac.2023.117062 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100135 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.04.098 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01683 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05380 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148821 · DOI
  18. 10.1136/bmj.333.7574.873-a · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341206 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462335 · DOI
  21. 10.3390/molecules26237159 · DOI
  22. 10.3390/colloids6030041 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00762 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166568 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127851 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132378 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c02798 · DOI
  28. 10.3390/w12113287 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/s41598-023-39241-z · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463636 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.08.163 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Olomukoro, A. A., Eitzmann, D. R., Anderson, J. L., & Gionfriddo, E.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Gionfriddo, Emanuela
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2025-04-07
Volume
97
Issue
14
Pages
7610-7615
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W4409234741
Cited by
6
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Chemistry (2203891, 2432184)
  • Iowa State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Ionic liquids properties and applications
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, poly(ionic liquids), thin film microextraction, preconcentration, ion exchange, partition coefficient, extraction kinetics, pseudo-second-order kinetics, competing anions, desorption, chain length effects, perfluorobutanoic acid, perfluorohexanoic acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review