The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the Selective Detection of Fe3+ Based on Graphene Quantum Dots as Fluorescent Probes: The Ksp of a Metal Hydroxide-Assisted Mechanism
Abstract
Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) have been widely used as fluorescence probes to detect metal ions with satisfactory selectivity. However, the diverse chemical structures of GQDs lead to selectivity for multiple metal ions, and this can lead to trouble in the interpretation of selectivity due to the lack of an in depth and systematic analysis. Herein, bare GQDs were synthesized by oxidizing carbon black with nitric acid and used as fluorescent probes to detect metal ions. We found that the specific ability of GQDs to recognize ferric ions relates to the acidity of the medium. Specifically, we demonstrated that the coordination between GQDs and Fe 3+ is regulated by the pH of the aqueous GQDs solution. Dissociative Fe 3+ can coordinate with the hydroxyl groups on the surface of the GQDs to form aggregates (such as iron hydroxide), which induces fluorescence quenching. A satisfactory selectivity for Fe 3+ ions was achieved under relatively acidic conditions; this is because of the extremely small K sp of ferric hydroxide compared to those of other common metal hydroxides. To directly survey the key parameter for Fe 3+ ion specificity, we performed the detection experiment in an environment free of interference from the buffer solution, noninherent groups, and other complex factors. This study will help researchers understand the selectivity mechanisms of GQDs as fluorescence probes for metal ions, which could guide the design of other GQD-based sensor platforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glowing Graphene Quantum Dots and Carbon Dots: Properties, Syntheses, and Biological Applications
Zheng, X. T., Ananthanarayanan, A., Luo, K. Q., & Chen, P. (2015) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201402648 · Cited by 2,190
Cited by
Review of Carbon and Graphene Quantum Dots for Sensing
Li, M., Chen, T., Gooding, J. J., & Liu, J. (2019) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.9b00514 · Cited by 991
A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors
Krishnan, S. K., Singh, E., Singh, P., Meyyappan, M., & Nalwa, H. S. (2019) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c8ra09577a · Cited by 785
Carbon-based quantum particles: an electroanalytical and biomedical perspective
Nekoueian, K., Amiri, M., Sillanpää, M., Marken, F., Boukherroub, R., & Szunerits, S. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00445e · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, X., Zhang, Z., Xue, Z., Huang, C., Shan, Y., Liu, C., Qin, X., Yang, W., Chen, X., & Wang, T.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-11-02
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12054-12058
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2766027456
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the Selective Detection of Fe3+ Based on Graphene Quantum Dots as Fluorescent Probes: The Ksp of a Metal Hydroxide-Assisted Mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02499
- The paper
- Zhu, X., Zhang, Z., Xue, Z., Huang, C., Shan, Y., Liu, C., Qin, X., Yang, W., Chen, X., & Wang, T. (2017). Understanding the Selective Detection of Fe3+ Based on Graphene Quantum Dots as Fluorescent Probes: The Ksp of a Metal Hydroxide-Assisted Mechanism. Analytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.