Cited by 2Heavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityTrace Elements in HealthIron Metabolism and Disorders

A Divalent Metal Cation–Metabolite Interaction Model Reveals Cation Buffering and Speciation

Sieg, Jacob P.·2024·Biochemistry

Abstract

I present the perspective that the divalent metalome and the metabolome can be modeled as a network of chelating interactions instead of separate entities. I review progress in understanding the complex cellular environment, in particular recent contributions to modeling metabolite-Mg 2+ interactions. I then demonstrate a simple extension of these strategies based approximately on intracellular Escherichia coli concentrations. This model is composed of four divalent metal cations with a range of cellular concentrations and physical properties (Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , Mn 2+ , and Zn 2+ ), eight representative metabolites, and interaction constants. I applied this model to predict the speciation of divalent metal cations between free and metabolite-chelated species. This approach reveals potentially beneficial properties, including maintenance of free divalent metal cations at biologically relevant concentrations, buffering of free divalent metal cations, and enrichment of functional metabolite-chelated species. While currently limited by available interaction coefficients, this modeling strategy can be generalized to more complex systems. In summary, biochemists should consider the potential of cellular metabolites to form chelating interactions with divalent metal cations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.biochem.4c00125

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The bulk ions (K+, Mg2+) have a low affinity for ligands and a large labile pool.

    “The bulk ions (K+, Mg2+) have a low affinity for ligands and a large labile pool,5,6”
  • At equilibrium, free metal pools are significant for K+ and Mg2+ and are composed of both free and weakly complexed ions.

    “At equilibrium, free metal pools are significant for K+ and Mg2+ and are composed of both free and weakly complexed ions.5−7”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sieg, J. P.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Sieg, Jacob P.
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2024-07-08
Volume
63
Issue
14
Pages
1709-1717
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W4400419518
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Keywords
divalent metal cations, chelation, metal speciation, metabolome, Escherichia coli, magnesium, calcium, manganese, zinc, interaction constants
MeSH terms
Buffers, Cations, Divalent, Chelating Agents, Escherichia coli, Magnesium, Models, Biological, Zinc, Metabolome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review