The Content of CpG-DNA in Antigen-CpG Conjugate Vaccines Determines Their Cross-Presentation Activity
Abstract
Cross-presentation, the process that facilitates display of exogenous antigens on MHC-I molecules, is a crucial step in the cascade of CD8 T cell activation. Potentiation of cross-presentation therefore represents an essential design criterion for development of subunit vaccines that target the induction of CD8 T cell immunity. Covalent conjugation of CpG-DNA to antigenic proteins has shown the potential to promote cross-presentation and has attracted great interest as a promising approach for vaccine development. However, heterogeneous product mixtures that result from typical conjugation schemes precluded identification of active conjugate species and impeded optimization of cross-presentation activity. In this report, we explore the effect of molecular composition of antigen-CpG conjugates on their cross-presentation activity using model Ovalbumin (OVA)-CpG conjugates. We developed a method to generate antigen-CpG conjugates with defined molecular compositions and leveraged this method to produce a series of OVA-CpG conjugates with one, two, and three CpG molecules linked to OVA. We observed that conjugates containing one CpG per OVA enhanced cross-presentation by 4-fold compared to native OVA, while conjugates with higher contents of CpG provided no cross-presentation enhancement. These differences are likely due to enhanced aggregation propensity observed for conjugates that carry more than one CpG per OVA. Our findings suggest that tuning molecular composition of antigen-CpG conjugates to maintain physical stability may be essential for achieving potent cross-presentation activity. Our method to generate defined conjugates could facilitate such molecular tuning and may be useful for continued development of antigen-CpG vaccines.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Kuchtey, J., Chefalo, P. J., Gray, R. C., Ramachandra, L., & Harding, C. V. (2005) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.175.4.2244 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Clauson, R. M., Berg, B., & Chertok, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chertok, Beata
- Venue
- Bioconjugate Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-02-15
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 561-567
- ISSN
- 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4812
- OpenAlex
- W2911828330
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioconjugate Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan
- William and Sally Seale Fund for Cancer Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
- Keywords
- cross-presentation, CpG DNA, ovalbumin, CD8+ T cell immunity, MHC class I, subunit vaccine, T cell activation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antigens, Cell Line, DNA, Ovalbumin, Vaccines, Conjugate, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, CpG Islands, Cross-Priming, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review