Cited by 113Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry

Nanoparticle Interactions with the Tumor Microenvironment

Open access
Huai, Yanyan, Hossen, Md Nazir, Wilhelm, Stefan, Bhattacharya, Resham, Mukherjee, Priyabrata·2019·Bioconjugate Chemistry

Abstract

Compared to normal tissues, the tumor microenvironment (TME) has a number of aberrant characteristics including hypoxia, acidosis, and vascular abnormalities. Many researchers have sought to exploit these anomalous features of the TME to develop anticancer therapies, and several nanoparticle-based cancer therapeutics have resulted. In this Review, we discuss the composition and pathophysiology of the TME, introduce nanoparticles (NPs) used in cancer therapy, and address the interaction between the TME and NPs. Finally, we outline both the potential problems that affect TME-based nanotherapy and potential strategies to overcome these challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00448

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • pH-, enzyme-, ROS-, or NIR-responsive PDA delivery systems may behave differently under real periodontal or tumor microenvironments, where pH, enzyme activity, oxygen levels, and light penetration are highly heterogeneous.

    “Similarly, pH-, enzyme-, ROS-, or NIR-responsive PDA delivery systems may behave differently under real periodontal or tumor microenvironments, where pH, enzyme activity, oxygen levels, and light penetration are highly heterogeneous.83,84”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [84]

    The pH Modulation of the TME section (page unavailable) describes pH-sensitive nanoparticle drug release, and the Tumor Hypoxia Modulation section (page unavailable) reports varying oxygen tensions within tumors. These passages support the general concern that tumor conditions can affect responsive systems, but they do not establish the claim specifically for PDA delivery systems or periodontal environments, nor do they establish heterogeneity in enzyme activity or light penetration. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 220

  1. [1]Chen X, and Zhang W (2017) Diamond Nanostructures for Drug Delivery, Bioimaging, and Biosensing. Chem. Soc. Rev 46, 734– 760. 27942638
  2. [2]Teixeira MC, Carbone C, and Souto EB (2017) Beyond Liposomes: Recent Advances on Lipid Based Nanostructures for Poorly Soluble/Poorly Permeable Drug Delivery. Prog. Lipid Res 68, 1– 11. 28778472
  3. [3]Okholm AH, and Kjems J (2016) DNA Nanovehicles and the Biological Barriers. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 106, 183– 191. 27276176
  4. [4]Cai C, Lin J, Lu Y, Zhang Q, and Wang L (2016) Polypeptide Self-Assemblies: Nanostructures and Bioapplications. Chem. Soc. Rev 45, 5985– 6012. 27722321
  5. [5]Zhang S, Geryak R, Geldmeier J, Kim S, and Tsukruk VV (2017) Synthesis, Assembly, and Applications of Hybrid Nanostructures for Biosensing. Chem. Rev 117, 12942– 13038. 28901750
  6. [6]Maeki M, Kimura N, Sato Y, Harashima H, and Tokeshi M (2018) Advances in Microfluidics for Lipid Nanoparticles and Extracellular Vesicles and Applications in Drug Delivery Systems. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 128, 84– 100. 29567396
  7. [7]Ulbrich K, Hola K, Subr V, Bakandritsos A, Tucek J, and Zboril R (2016) Targeted Drug Delivery with Polymers and Magnetic Nanoparticles: Covalent and Noncovalent Approaches, Release Control, and Clinical Studies. Chem. Rev 116, 5338– 5431. 27109701
  8. [8]Thakor AS, Jokerst JV, Ghanouni P, Campbell JL, Mittra E, and Gambhir SS (2016) Clinically Approved Nanoparticle Imaging Agents. J. Nucl. Med 57, 1833– 1837. 27738007 PMC5126695
  9. [9]Savla R, and Minko T (2017) Nanoparticle Design Considerations for Molecular Imaging of Apoptosis: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Value. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 113, 122– 140. 27374457
  10. [10]Fonjungo PN, Alemnji GA, Kebede Y, Opio A, Mwangi C, Spira TJ, Beard RS, and Nkengasong JN (2017) Combatting Global Infectious Diseases: A Network Effect of Specimen Referral Systems. Clin. Infect. Dis 64, 796. 28200031
  11. [11]Irvine DJ, Hanson MC, Rakhra K, and Tokatlian T (2015) Synthetic Nanoparticles for Vaccines and Immunotherapy. Chem. Rev 115, 11109– 11146. 26154342 PMC4688911
  12. [12]Saha S, Xiong X, Chakraborty PK, Shameer K, Arvizo RR, Kudgus RA, Dwivedi SK, Hossen MN, Gillies EM, Robertson JD, (2016) Gold Nanoparticle Reprograms Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment and Inhibits Tumor Growth. ACS Nano 10, 10636– 10651. 27758098 PMC6939886
  13. [13]Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, and Farokhzad OC (2017) Cancer Nanomedicine: Progress, Challenges and Opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 20– 37. 27834398 PMC5575742
  14. [15]Chen X, Xia Q, Cao Y, Min Q, Zhang J, Chen Z, Chen HY, and Zhu JJ (2017) Imaging the Transient Heat Generation of Individual Nanostructures with a Mechanoresponsive Polymer. Nat. Commun 8, 1498. 29138401 PMC5686141
  15. [16]Liu Y, Wei G, Cheng WA, Dong Z, Sun H, Lee VY, Cha SC, Smith DL, Kwak LW, and Qin H (2018) Targeting Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Immunother 67, 1181– 1195. 29855694 PMC11028324
  16. [17]Kang S, Shin W, Choi MH, Ahn M, Kim YK, Kim S, Min DH, and Jang H (2018) Morphology-Controlled Synthesis of Rhodium Nanoparticles for Cancer Phototherapy. ACS Nano 12, 6997– 7008. 29901981
  17. [18]Lyu Y, Xie C, Chechetka SA, Miyako E, and Pu K (2016) Semiconducting Polymer Nanobioconjugates for Targeted Photothermal Activation of Neurons. J. Am. Chem. Soc 138, 9049– 9052. 27404507
  18. [19]Yue X, Zhang Q, and Dai Z (2017) Near-Infrared Light-Activatable Polymeric Nanoformulations for Combined Therapy and Imaging of Cancer. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 115, 155– 170. 28455188
  19. [20]Chiu CF, Saidi WA, Kagan VE, and Star A (2017) Defect-Induced near-Infrared Photoluminescence of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Treated with Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc 139, 4859– 4865. 28288512 PMC6540762
  20. [21]Chen YW, Su YL, Hu SH, and Chen SY (2016) Functionalized Graphene Nanocomposites for Enhancing Photothermal Therapy in Tumor Treatment. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 105, 190– 204. 27262922
  21. [22]Zhou P, Li B, Liu F, Zhang M, Wang Q, Liu Y, Yao Y, and Li D (2017) The Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (Emt) and Cancer Stem Cells: Implication for Treatment Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer. Mol. Cancer 16, 52. 28245823 PMC5331747
  22. [23]Guo B, Sheng Z, Hu D, Li A, Xu S, Manghnani PN, Liu C, Guo L, Zheng H, and Liu B (2017) Molecular Engineering of Conjugated Polymers for Biocompatible Organic Nanoparticles with Highly Efficient Photoacoustic and Photothermal Performance in Cancer Theranostics. ACS Nano 11, 10124– 10134. 28892609
  23. [24]Qi J, Fang Y, Kwok RTK, Zhang X, Hu X, Lam JWY, Ding D, and Tang BZ (2017) Highly Stable Organic Small Molecular Nanoparticles as an Advanced and Biocompatible Phototheranostic Agent of Tumor in Living Mice. ACS Nano 11, 7177– 7188. 28692799
  24. [25]Lazarovits J, Chen YY, Song F, Ngo W, Tavares AJ, Zhang YN, Audet J, Tang B, Lin Q, Tleugabulova MC, (2019) Synthesis of Patient-Specific Nanomaterials. Nano Lett. 19, 116– 123. 30525697
  25. [26]Wen S, Zhou J, Zheng K, Bednarkiewicz A, Liu X, and Jin D, (2018) Advances in Highly Doped Upconversion Nanoparticles. Nat. Commun 9, 2415. 29925838 PMC6010470
  26. [27]Wilhelm S (2017) Perspectives for Upconverting Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 11, 10644– 10653. 29068198
  27. [28]Khutoryanskiy VV (2018) Beyond Pegylation: Alternative Surface-Modification of Nanoparticles with Mucus-Inert Biomaterials. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 124, 140– 149. 28736302
  28. [29]Sedlmeier A, and Gorris HH (2015) Surface Modification and Characterization of Photon-Upconverting Nanoparticles for Bioanalytical Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev 44, 1526– 1560. 25176175
  29. [32]Dai Q, Wilhelm S, Ding D, Syed AM, Sindhwani S, Zhang Y, Chen YY, MacMillan P, and Chan WCW (2018) Quantifying the Ligand-Coated Nanoparticle Delivery to Cancer Cells in Solid Tumors. ACS Nano 12, 8423– 8435. 30016073
  30. [33]Lange S, Saur D, and Rad R (2016) Sirna-Coupled Nanoparticles for Improved Therapeutic Targeting of Pancreatic Cancer. Gut 65, 1780– 1781. 27436269
  31. [34]Mahajan UM, Teller S, Sendler M, Palankar R, van den Brandt C, Schwaiger T, Kuhn JP, Ribback S, Glockl G, Evert M, (2016) Tumour-Specific Delivery of Sirna-Coupled Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles, Targeted against Plk1, Stops Progression of Pancreatic Cancer. Gut 65, 1838– 1849. 27196585 PMC5099195
  32. [35]Salahandish R, Ghaffarinejad A, Naghib SM, Majidzadeh AK, Zargartalebi H, and Sanati-Nezhad A (2018) Nano-Biosensor for Highly Sensitive Detection of Her2 Positive Breast Cancer. Biosens. Bioelectron 117, 104– 111. 29890392
  33. [36]Shi Y, Zhou M, Zhang J, and Lu W (2015) Preparation and Cellular Targeting Study of Vegf-Conjugated Plga Nanoparticles. J. Microencapsulation 32, 699– 704. 26004370
  34. [37]Donahue ND, Acar H, and Wilhelm S (2019) Concepts of Nanoparticle Cellular Uptake, Intracellular Trafficking, and Kinetics in Nanomedicine. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev, DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.04.008. 31022434 · DOI
  35. [40]Corbet C, and Feron O (2017) Tumour Acidosis: From the Passenger to the Driver’s Seat. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 577– 593. 28912578
  36. [41]Huckaby JT, and Lai SK (2018) Pegylation for Enhancing Nanoparticle Diffusion in Mucus. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 124, 125– 139. 28882703
  37. [42]Ku SH, Jo SD, Lee YK, Kim K, and Kim SH (2016) Chemical and Structural Modifications of Rnai Therapeutics. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 104, 16– 28. 26549145
  38. [43]Roy A, and Li SD (2016) Modifying the Tumor Microenvironment Using Nanoparticle Therapeutics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev. Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 8, 891– 908. 27038329 PMC5045752
  39. [45]McDonald DM, and Choyke PL (2003) Imaging of Angiogenesis: From Microscope to Clinic. Nat. Med 9, 713– 725. 12778170
  40. [46]Hida K, Maishi N, Sakurai Y, Hida Y, and Harashima H (2016) Heterogeneity of Tumor Endothelial Cells and Drug Delivery. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 99, 140– 147. 26626622
  41. [47]Maishi N, and Hida K (2017) Tumor Endothelial Cells Accelerate Tumor Metastasis. Cancer Sci 108, 1921– 1926. 28763139 PMC5623747
  42. [48]Acharya S, and Sahoo SK (2011) Plga Nanoparticles Containing Various Anticancer Agents and Tumour Delivery by Epr Effect. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 63, 170– 183. 20965219
  43. [49]Poon W, Zhang YN, Ouyang B, Kingston BR, Wu JLY, Wilhelm S, and Chan WCW (2019) Elimination Pathways of Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 13, 5785– 5798. 30990673
  44. [50]Muraki C, Ohga N, Hida Y, Nishihara H, Kato Y, Tsuchiya K, Matsuda K, Totsuka Y, Shindoh M, and Hida K (2012) Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition Causes Antiangiogenic Effects on Tumor Endothelial and Vascular Progenitor Cells. Int. J. Cancer 130, 59– 70. 21384343
  45. [51]Helske S, Laine M, Kupari M, Lommi J, Turto H, Nurmi L, Tikkanen I, Werkkala K, Lindstedt KA, and Kovanen PT (2007) Increased Expression of Profibrotic Neutral Endopeptidase and Bradykinin Type 1 Receptors in Stenotic Aortic Valves. Eur. Heart J 28, 1894– 1903. 17507367
  46. [52]Forstermann U, and Sessa WC (2012) Nitric Oxide Synthases: Regulation and Function. Eur. Heart J 33, 829– 837. 21890489 PMC3345541
  47. [53]Ferdinandy P, Danial H, Ambrus I, Rothery RA, and Schulz R (2000) Peroxynitrite Is a Major Contributor to Cytokine-Induced Myocardial Contractile Failure. Circ. Res 87, 241– 247. 10926876
  48. [54]Su B, Wang R, Xie Z, Ruan H, Li J, Xie C, Lu W, Wang J, Wang D, and Liu M (2018) Effect of Retro-Inverso Isomer of Bradykinin on Size-Dependent Penetration of Blood-Brain Tumor Barrier. Small 14, 1702331. 29292579
  49. [55]Wang X, Yang C, Zhang Y, Zhen X, Wu W, and Jiang X (2014) Delivery of Platinum(Iv) Drug to Subcutaneous Tumor and Lung Metastasis Using Bradykinin-Potentiating Peptide-Decorated Chitosan Nanoparticles. Biomaterials 35, 6439– 6453. 24811257
  50. [56]Dai Q, Wilhelm S, Ding D, Syed AM, Sindhwani S, Zhang YW, Chen YY, MacMillan P, and Chan WCW (2018) Quantifying the Ligand-Coated Nanoparticle Delivery to Cancer Cells in Solid Tumors. ACS Nano 12, 8423– 8435. 30016073
  51. [57]Ishii G, Ochiai A, and Neri S (2016) Phenotypic and Functional Heterogeneity of Cancer-Associated Fibroblast within the Tumor Microenvironment. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 99, 186– 196. 26278673
  52. [58]Kalluri R (2016) The Biology and Function of Fibroblasts in Cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 582– 598. 27550820
  53. [59]Quail DF, and Joyce JA (2013) Microenvironmental Regulation of Tumor Progression and Metastasis. Nat. Med 19, 1423– 1437. 24202395 PMC3954707
  54. [60]Yu S, Jiang Y, Wan F, Wu J, Gao Z, and Liu D (2017) Immortalized Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Promote Prostate Cancer Carcinogenesis, Proliferation and Invasion. Anticancer Res. 37, 4311– 4318. 28739723
  55. [61]Mahale J, Smagurauskaite G, Brown K, Thomas A, and Howells LM (2016) The Role of Stromal Fibroblasts in Lung Carcinogenesis: A Target for Chemoprevention? Int. J. Cancer 138, 30– 44. 25611701
  56. [63]Zhang Q, Yang J, Bai J, and Ren J (2018) Reverse of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Drug Resistance Induced by Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Via a Paracrine Pathway. Cancer Sci. 109, 944– 955. 29383798 PMC5891180
  57. [64]Wang L, Liu X, Zhou Q, Sui M, Lu Z, Zhou Z, Tang J, Miao Y, Zheng M, Wang W, (2017) Terminating the Criminal Collaboration in Pancreatic Cancer: Nanoparticle-Based Synergistic Therapy for Overcoming Fibroblast-Induced Drug Resistance. Biomaterials 144, 105– 118. 28837958
  58. [65]Li L, Zhou S, Lv N, Zhen Z, Liu T, Gao S, Xie J, and Ma Q (2018) Photosensitizer-Encapsulated Ferritins Mediate Photodynamic Therapy against Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Improve Tumor Accumulation of Nanoparticles. Mol. Pharmaceutics 15, 3595– 3599. PMC6435375 29966416
  59. [66]Kise K, Kinugasa-Katayama Y, and Takakura N (2016) Tumor Microenvironment for Cancer Stem Cells. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 99, 197– 205. 26362921
  60. [67]Krause M, Dubrovska A, Linge A, and Baumann M (2017) Cancer Stem Cells: Radioresistance, Prediction of Radiotherapy Outcome and Specific Targets for Combined Treatments. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 109, 63– 73. 26877102
  61. [68]Clarke MF, Dick JE, Dirks PB, Eaves CJ, Jamieson CH,, Jones DL, Visvader J, Weissman IL, and Wahl GM (2006) Cancer Stem Cells-Perspectives on Current Status and Future Directions: Aacr Workshop on Cancer Stem Cells. Cancer Res. 66, 9339– 9344. 16990346
  62. [69]Putzer BM, Solanki M, and Herchenroder O (2017) Advances in Cancer Stem Cell Targeting: How to Strike the Evil at Its Root. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 120, 89– 107. 28736304
  63. [70]Haabeth OA, Lorvik KB, Hammarstrom C, Donaldson IM, Haraldsen G, Bogen B, and Corthay A (2011) Inflammation Driven by Tumour-Specific Th1 Cells Protects against B-Cell Cancer. Nat. Commun 2, 240. 21407206 PMC3072106
  64. [71]De Monte L, Reni M, Tassi E, Clavenna D, Papa I, Recalde H, Braga M, Di Carlo V, Doglioni C, and Protti MP (2011) Intratumor T Helper Type 2 Cell Infiltrate Correlates with Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin Production and Reduced Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. J. Exp. Med 208, 469– 478. 21339327 PMC3058573
  65. [72]Adeegbe DO, and Nishikawa H (2013) Natural and Induced T Regulatory Cells in Cancer. Front. Immunol 4, 190. 23874336 PMC3708155
  66. [73]Whiteside TL, Schuler P, and Schilling B (2012) Induced and Natural Regulatory T Cells in Human Cancer. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther 12, 1383– 1397. 22849383 PMC3730844
  67. [74]Bronte V (2008) Th17 and Cancer: Friends or Foes? Blood 112, 214. 18606882
  68. [75]Reading JL, Galvez-Cancino F, Swanton C, Lladser A, Peggs KS, and Quezada SA (2018) The Function and Dysfunction of Memory Cd8(+) T Cells in Tumor Immunity. Immunol Rev. 283, 194– 212. 29664561
  69. [76]Stephens GL, McHugh RS, Whitters MJ, Young DA, Luxenberg D, Carreno BM, Collins M, and Shevach EM (2004) Engagement of Glucocorticoid-Induced Tnfr Family-Related Receptor on Effector T Cells by Its Ligand Mediates Resistance to Suppression by Cd4+Cd25+ T Cells. J. Immunol 173, 5008– 5020. 15470044
  70. [77]Mantovani A, Marchesi F, Malesci A, Laghi L, and Allavena P (2017) Tumour-Associated Macrophages as Treatment Targets in Oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol 14, 399– 416. 28117416 PMC5480600
  71. [78]Chiang CL, Balint K, Coukos G, and Kandalaft LE (2015) Potential Approaches for More Successful Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther 15, 569– 582. 25553913
  72. [79]Beaty BT, and Condeelis J (2014) Digging a Little Deeper: The Stages of Invadopodium Formation and Maturation. Eur. J. Cell Biol 93, 438– 444. 25113547 PMC4262566
  73. [80]Levental KR, Yu H, Kass L, Lakins JN, Egeblad M, Erler JT, Fong SF, Csiszar K, Giaccia A, Weninger W, (2009) Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling. Cell 139, 891– 906. 19931152 PMC2788004
  74. [82]Pickup MW, Mouw JK, and Weaver VM (2014) The Extracellular Matrix Modulates the Hallmarks of Cancer. EMBO Rep. 15, 1243– 1253. 25381661 PMC4264927
  75. [83]Ramaswamy S, Ross KN, Lander ES, and Golub TR (2003) A Molecular Signature of Metastasis in Primary Solid Tumors. Nat. Genet 33, 49– 54. 12469122
  76. [84]Yonenaga Y, Mori A, Onodera H, Yasuda S, Oe H, Fujimoto A, Tachibana T, and Imamura M (2005) Absence of Smooth Muscle Actin-Positive Pericyte Coverage of Tumor Vessels Correlates with Hematogenous Metastasis and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients. Oncology 69, 159– 166. 16127287
  77. [85]Abramsson A, Berlin O, Papayan H, Paulin D, Shani M, and Betsholtz C (2002) Analysis of Mural Cell Recruitment to Tumor Vessels. Circulation 105, 112– 117. 11772885
  78. [86]Chantrain CF, Henriet P, Jodele S, Emonard H, Feron O, Courtoy PJ, DeClerck YA, and Marbaix E (2006) Mechanisms of Pericyte Recruitment in Tumour Angiogenesis: A New Role for Metalloproteinases. Eur. J. Cancer 42, 310– 318. 16406506
  79. [87]Chen G, Chen SM, Wang X, Ding XF, Ding J, and Meng LH (2012) Inhibition of Chemokine (Cxc Motif) Ligand 12/Chemokine (Cxc Motif) Receptor 4 Axis (Cxcl12/Cxcr4)-Mediated Cell Migration by Targeting Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (Mtor) Pathway in Human Gastric Carcinoma Cells. J. Biol. Chem 287, 12132– 12141. 22337890 PMC3320958
  80. [88]Yu M, and Zheng J (2015) Clearance Pathways and Tumor Targeting of Imaging Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 9, 6655– 6674. 26149184 PMC4955575
  81. [89]Fang J, Nakamura H, and Maeda H (2011) The Epr Effect: Unique Features of Tumor Blood Vessels for Drug Delivery, Factors Involved, and Limitations and Augmentation of the Effect. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 63, 136– 151. 20441782
  82. [90]Matsumura Y, and Maeda H (1986) A New Concept for Macromolecular Therapeutics in Cancer Chemotherapy: Mechanism of Tumoritropic Accumulation of Proteins and the Antitumor Agent Smancs. Cancer Res. 46, 6387– 6392. 2946403
  83. [91]Tong X, Wang Z, Sun X, Song J, Jacobson O, Niu G, Kiesewetter DO, and Chen X (2016) Size Dependent Kinetics of Gold Nanorods in Epr Mediated Tumor Delivery. Theranostics 6, 2039– 2051. 27698939 PMC5039679
  84. [92]Geng Y, Dalhaimer P, Cai S, Tsai R, Tewari M, Minko T, and Discher DE (2007) Shape Effects of Filaments Versus Spherical Particles in Flow and Drug Delivery. Nat. Nanotechnol 2, 249– 255. 18654271 PMC2740330
  85. [93]Smith BR, Kempen P, Bouley D, Xu A, Liu Z, Melosh N, Dai H, Sinclair R, and Gambhir SS (2012) Shape Matters: Intravital Microscopy Reveals Surprising Geometrical Dependence for Nanoparticles in Tumor Models of Extravasation. Nano Lett. 12, 3369– 3377. 22650417 PMC3495189
  86. [94]Xu Q, Ensign LM, Boylan NJ, Schon A, Gong X, Yang JC, Lamb NW, Cai S, Yu T, Freire E, (2015) Impact of Surface Polyethylene Glycol (Peg) Density on Biodegradable Nanoparticle Transport in Mucus Ex Vivo and Distribution in Vivo. ACS Nano 9, 9217– 9227. 26301576 PMC4890729
  87. [95]Nichols JW, and Bae YH (2014) Epr: Evidence and Fallacy. J. Controlled Release 190, 451– 464. 24794900
  88. [96]Danhier F (2016) To Exploit the Tumor Microenvironment: Since the Epr Effect Fails in the Clinic, What Is the Future of Nanomedicine? J. Controlled Release 244, 108– 121. 27871992
  89. [97]Dings RP, van der Schaft DW, Hargittai B, Haseman J, Griffioen AW, and Mayo KH (2003) Anti-Tumor Activity of the Novel Angiogenesis Inhibitor Anginex. Cancer Lett. 194, 55– 66. 12706859
  90. [98]Danhier F, Pourcelle V, Marchand-Brynaert J, Jerome C, Feron O, and Preat V (2012) Targeting of Tumor Endothelium by Rgd-Grafted Plga-Nanoparticles. Methods Enzymol 508, 157– 175. 22449925
  91. [99]Kluza E, van der Schaft DW, Hautvast PA, Mulder WJ, Mayo KH, Griffioen AW, Strijkers GJ, and Nicolay K (2010) Synergistic Targeting of Alphavbeta3 Integrin and Galectin-1 with Heteromultivalent Paramagnetic Liposomes for Combined Mr Imaging and Treatment of Angiogenesis. Nano Lett. 10, 52– 58. 19968235
  92. [100]Zhu X, Guo X, Liu D, Gong Y, Sun J, and Dong C (2017) Promotion of Propranolol Delivery to Hemangiomas by Using Anti-Vegfr Antibody-Conjugated Poly(Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid) Nanoparticles. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol 13, 1694– 1705. 29490757
  93. [102]Casazza A, Di Conza G, Wenes M, Finisguerra V, Deschoemaeker S, and Mazzone M (2014) Tumor Stroma: A Complexity Dictated by the Hypoxic Tumor Microenvironment. Oncogene 33, 1743– 1754. 23604130
  94. [104]Fleming IN, Manavaki R, Blower PJ, West C, Williams KJ, Harris AL, Domarkas J, Lord S, Baldry C, and Gilbert FJ (2015) Imaging Tumour Hypoxia with Positron Emission Tomography. Br. J. Cancer 112, 238– 250. 25514380 PMC4453462
  95. [106]Yoshimura M, Itasaka S, Harada H, and Hiraoka M (2013) Microenvironment and Radiation Therapy. BioMed Res. Int 2013, 685308. 23509762 PMC3591225
  96. [107]Barcellos-Hoff MH, and Cordes N (2007) Radiation Therapy and the Microenvironment. Int. J. Radiat. Biol 83, 723– 725. 18058363
  97. [108]Lee HY, Kim HW, Lee JH, and Oh SH (2015) Controlling Oxygen Release from Hollow Microparticles for Prolonged Cell Survival under Hypoxic Environment. Biomaterials 53, 583– 591. 25890754
  98. [109]Teicher BA, and Rose CM (1984) Perfluorochemical Emulsions Can Increase Tumor Radiosensitivity. Science 223, 934– 936. 6695191
  99. [110]Song G, Ji C, Liang C, Song X, Yi X, Dong Z, Yang K, and Liu Z (2017) Taox Decorated Perfluorocarbon Nanodroplets as Oxygen Reservoirs to Overcome Tumor Hypoxia and Enhance Cancer Radiotherapy. Biomaterials 112, 257– 263. 27768978
  100. [111]Piras AM, Dessy A, Chiellini F, Chiellini E, Farina C, Ramelli M, and Della Valle E (2008) Polymeric Nanoparticles for Hemoglobin-Based Oxygen Carriers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Proteins Proteomics 1784, 1454– 1461. 18452723
  101. [112]Jia Y, Duan L, and Li J (2016) Hemoglobin-Based Nanoarchitectonic Assemblies as Oxygen Carriers. Adv. Mater 28, 1312– 1318. 26479864
  102. [113]Silva I, Rausch V, Peccerella T, Millonig G, Seitz HK, and Mueller S (2018) Hypoxia Enhances H2o2-Mediated Upregulation of Hepcidin: Evidence for Nox4-Mediated Iron Regulation. Redox Biol. 16, 1– 10. 29459227 PMC5832675
  103. [114]Song G, Chen Y, Liang C, Yi X, Liu J, Sun X, Shen S, Yang K, and Liu Z (2016) Catalase-Loaded Taox Nanoshells as Bio-Nanoreactors Combining High-Z Element and Enzyme Delivery for Enhancing Radiotherapy. Adv. Mater 28, 7143– 7148. 27275921
  104. [115]Ellis LM, and Hicklin DJ (2008) Vegf-Targeted Therapy: Mechanisms of Anti-Tumour Activity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 579– 591. 18596824
  105. [116]Zhang C, Ni D, Liu Y, Yao H, Bu W, and Shi J (2017) Magnesium Silicide Nanoparticles as a Deoxygenation Agent for Cancer Starvation Therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol 12, 378– 386. 28068318
  106. [117]Liu Y, Liu Y, Bu W, Cheng C, Zuo C, Xiao Q, Sun Y, Ni D, Zhang C, Liu J, (2015) Hypoxia Induced by Upconversion-Based Photodynamic Therapy: Towards Highly Effective Synergistic Bioreductive Therapy in Tumors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 54, 8105– 8109. 26012928
  107. [118]Zhu H, Zhang L, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Wang K, Xie X, Song L, Wang D, Han C, and Chen Q (2016) Aptamer-Peg-Modified Fe3o4@Mn as a Novel T1- and T2-Dual-Model Mri Contrast Agent Targeting Hypoxia-Induced Cancer Stem Cells. Sci. Rep 6, 39245. 27976736 PMC5157021
  108. [119]Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, and Thompson CB (2009) Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation. Science 324, 1029– 1033. 19460998 PMC2849637
  109. [120]Urano Y, Asanuma D, Hama Y, Koyama Y, Barrett T, Kamiya M, Nagano T, Watanabe T, Hasegawa A, Choyke PL, (2009) Selective Molecular Imaging of Viable Cancer Cells with Ph-Activatable Fluorescence Probes. Nat. Med 15, 104– 109. 19029979 PMC2790281
  110. [121]Cardone RA, Casavola V, and Reshkin SJ (2005) The Role of Disturbed Ph Dynamics and the Na+/H+ Exchanger in Metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 786– 795. 16175178
  111. [122]Dai Y, Xu C, Sun X, and Chen X (2017) Nanoparticle Design Strategies for Enhanced Anticancer Therapy by Exploiting the Tumour Microenvironment. Chem. Soc. Rev 46, 3830– 3852. 28516983 PMC5521825
  112. [123]Brisson L, Reshkin SJ, Gore J, and Roger S (2012) Ph Regulators in Invadosomal Functioning: Proton Delivery for Matrix Tasting. Eur. J. Cell Biol 91, 847– 860. 22673002
  113. [124]Justus CR, Dong L, and Yang LV (2013) Acidic Tumor Microenvironment and Ph-Sensing G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Front. Physiol 4, 354. 24367336 PMC3851830
  114. [125]Cairns R, Papandreou I, and Denko N (2006) Overcoming Physiologic Barriers to Cancer Treatment by Molecularly Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment. Mol. Cancer Res 4, 61– 70. 16513837
  115. [126]Huo M, Wang L, Chen Y, and Shi J (2017) Tumor-Selective Catalytic Nanomedicine by Nanocatalyst Delivery. Nat. Commun 8, 357. 28842577 PMC5572465
  116. [127]Zhang C, Zhao K, Bu W, Ni D, Liu Y, Feng J, and Shi J (2015) Marriage of Scintillator and Semiconductor for Synchronous Radiotherapy and Deep Photodynamic Therapy with Diminished Oxygen Dependence. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 54, 1770– 1774. 25483028
  117. [128]Liu Y, Zhi X, Yang M, Zhang J, Lin L, Zhao X, Hou W, Zhang C, Zhang Q, Pan F, (2017) Tumor-Triggered Drug Release from Calcium Carbonate-Encapsulated Gold Nanostars for near-Infrared Photodynamic/Photothermal Combination Antitumor Therapy. Theranostics 7, 1650– 1662. 28529642 PMC5436518
  118. [129]Wei J, Cheang T, Tang B, Xia H, Xing Z, Chen Z, Fang Y, Chen W, Xu A, Wang S, (2013) The Inhibition of Human Bladder Cancer Growth by Calcium Carbonate/Caip6 Nanocomposite Particles Delivering Aib1 Sirna. Biomaterials 34, 1246– 1254. 23127333
  119. [130]Ma J, Wu H, Li Y, Liu Z, Liu G, Guo Y, Hou Z, Zhao Q, Chen D, and Zhu X (2018) Novel Core-Interlayer-Shell Dox/Znpc Co-Loaded Msns@ Ph-Sensitive Cap@Pegylated Liposome for Enhanced Synergetic Chemo-Photodynamic Therapy. Pharm. Res 35, 57. 29423532
  120. [131]Shah SA, Sohail M, Minhas MU, Nisar Ur R, Khan S, Hussain Z, Mudassir, Mahmood A, Kousar M, and Mahmood A (2019) Ph-Responsive Cap-Co-Poly(Methacrylic Acid)-Based Hydrogel as an Efficient Platform for Controlled Gastrointestinal Delivery: Fabrication, Characterization, in Vitro and in Vivo Toxicity Evaluation. Drug Delivery Transl Res. 9, 555– 577. 29450805
  121. [132]Cai X, Luo Y, Zhang W, Du D, and Lin Y (2016) Ph-Sensitive Zno Quantum Dots-Doxorubicin Nanoparticles for Lung Cancer Targeted Drug Delivery. ACS Appl Mater. Interfaces 8, 22442– 22450. 27463610
  122. [133]Ye DX, Ma YY, Zhao W, Cao HM, Kong JL, Xiong HM, and Mohwald H (2016) Zno-Based Nanoplatforms for Labeling and Treatment of Mouse Tumors without Detectable Toxic Side Effects. ACS Nano 10, 4294– 4300. 27018822
  123. [134]Chen Z, Yin JJ, Zhou YT, Zhang Y, Song L, Song M, Hu S, and Gu N (2012) Dual Enzyme-Like Activities of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Implication for Diminishing Cytotoxicity. ACS Nano 6, 4001– 4012. 22533614
  124. [135]Gao L, Zhuang J, Nie L, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Gu N, Wang T, Feng J, Yang D, Perrett S, (2007) Intrinsic Peroxidase-Like Activity of Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol 2, 577– 583. 18654371
  125. [136]Tang Z, Zhang H, Liu Y, Ni D, Zhang H, Zhang J, Yao Z, He M, Shi J, and Bu W (2017) Antiferromagnetic Pyrite as the Tumor Microenvironment-Mediated Nanoplatform for Self-Enhanced Tumor Imaging and Therapy. Adv. Mater 29, 1701683. 29094389
  126. [137]Tang Z, Liu Y, He M, and Bu W (2019) Chemodynamic Therapy: Tumour Microenvironment-Mediated Fenton and Fenton-Like Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 58, 946– 956. 30048028
  127. [138]Min KH, Min HS, Lee HJ, Park DJ, Yhee JY, Kim K, Kwon IC, Jeong SY, Silvestre OF, Chen X, (2015) Ph-Controlled Gas-Generating Mineralized Nanoparticles: A Theranostic Agent for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy of Cancers. ACS Nano 9, 134– 145. 25559896 PMC5242341
  128. [139]Dong Z, Feng L, Hao Y, Chen M, Gao M, Chao Y, Zhao H, Zhu W, Liu J, Liang C, (2018) Synthesis of Hollow Biomineralized Caco3-Polydopamine Nanoparticles for Multimodal Imaging-Guided Cancer Photodynamic Therapy with Reduced Skin Photosensitivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc 140, 2165– 2178. 29376345
  129. [140]Zhou H, Wei J, Dai Q, Wang L, Luo J, Cheang T, and Wang S (2015) Caco(3)/Caip(6) Composite Nanoparticles Effectively Deliver Akt1 Small Interfering Rna to Inhibit Human Breast Cancer Growth. Int. J. Nanomed 10, 4255– 4266. PMC4494612 26170662
  130. [141]Zhang J, Wu D, Li MF, and Feng J (2015) Multifunctional Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Based on Charge-Reversal Plug-Gate Nanovalves and Acid-Decomposable Zno Quantum Dots for Intracellular Drug Delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 26666– 26673. 26553405
  131. [142]Liu J, Huang Y, Kumar A, Tan A, Jin S, Mozhi A, and Liang XJ (2014) Ph-Sensitive Nano-Systems for Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy. Biotechnol. Adv 32, 693– 710. 24309541
  132. [143]Mai BT, Fernandes S, Balakrishnan PB, and Pellegrino T (2018) Nanosystems Based on Magnetic Nanoparticles and Thermo- or Ph-Responsive Polymers: An Update and Future Perspectives. Acc. Chem. Res 51, 999– 1013. 29733199
  133. [144]Yang X, Grailer JJ, Rowland IJ, Javadi A, Hurley SA, Matson VZ, Steeber DA, and Gong S (2010) Multifunctional Stable and Ph-Responsive Polymer Vesicles Formed by Heterofunctional Triblock Copolymer for Targeted Anticancer Drug Delivery and Ultrasensitive Mr Imaging. ACS Nano 4, 6805– 6817. 20958084
  134. [145]Han J, Sun J, Bai S, Panezai H, Jin X, and Wu X (2015) “Graft to” Synthesis and Ibuprofen-Loading Performance of Ph-Sensitive Pmaa-Silica Hybrid Nanoparticles with Controlled Bimodal Mesopores. J. Pharm. Sci 104, 4299– 4306. 26501935
  135. [146]Xu Q, Huang W, Jiang L, Lei Z, Li X, and Deng H (2013) Kgm and Pmaa Based Ph-Sensitive Interpenetrating Polymer Network Hydrogel for Controlled Drug Release. Carbohydr. Polym 97, 565– 570. 23911486
  136. [147]Liu Y, Li XS, Hu J, Guo M, Liu WJ, Feng YM, Xie JR, and Du GX (2015) Fabrication of Mpeg-B-Pmaa Capped Yvo4:Eu Nanoparticles with Biocompatibility for Cell Imaging. Colloids Surf., B 136, 721– 728. 26513755
  137. [148]Lindau D, Gielen P, Kroesen M, Wesseling P, and Adema GJ (2013) The Immunosuppressive Tumour Network: Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells, Regulatory T Cells and Natural Killer T Cells. Immunology 138, 105– 115. 23216602 PMC3575763
  138. [149]Zhang M, He Y, Sun X, Li Q, Wang W, Zhao A, and Di W (2014) A High M1/M2 Ratio of Tumor-Associated Macrophages Is Associated with Extended Survival in Ovarian Cancer Patients. J. Ovarian Res 7, 19. 24507759 PMC3939626
  139. [150]Ries CH, Cannarile MA, Hoves S, Benz J, Wartha K, Runza V, Rey-Giraud F, Pradel LP, Feuerhake F, Klaman I, (2014) Targeting Tumor-Associated Macrophages with Anti-Csf-1r Antibody Reveals a Strategy for Cancer Therapy. Cancer Cell 25, 846– 859. 24898549
  140. [151]Song M, Liu T, Shi C, Zhang X, and Chen X (2016) Bioconjugated Manganese Dioxide Nanoparticles Enhance Chemotherapy Response by Priming Tumor-Associated Macrophages toward M1-Like Phenotype and Attenuating Tumor Hypoxia. ACS Nano 10, 633– 647. 26650065 PMC5242343
  141. [152]Zhu S, Niu M, O’Mary H, and Cui Z (2013) Targeting of Tumor-Associated Macrophages Made Possible by Peg-Sheddable, Mannose-Modified Nanoparticles. Mol. Pharmaceutics 10, 3525– 3530. PMC3946577 23901887
  142. [153]Zanganeh S, Hutter G, Spitler R, Lenkov O, Mahmoudi M, Shaw A, Pajarinen JS, Nejadnik H, Goodman S, Moseley M, (2016) Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Inhibit Tumour Growth by Inducing Pro-Inflammatory Macrophage Polarization in Tumour Tissues. Nat. Nanotechnol 11, 986– 994. 27668795 PMC5198777
  143. [154]MacParland SA, Tsoi KM, Ouyang B, Ma XZ, Manuel J, Fawaz A, Ostrowski MA, Alman BA, Zilman A, Chan WC, (2017) Phenotype Determines Nanoparticle Uptake by Human Macrophages from Liver and Blood. ACS Nano 11, 2428– 2443. 28040885
  144. [155]Kullberg M, Martinson H, Mann K, and Anchordoquy TJ (2015) Complement C3Mediated Targeting of Liposomes to Granulocytic Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells. Nanomedicine 11, 1355– 1363. 25839391 PMC4494874
  145. [156]Mirza N, Fishman M, Fricke I, Dunn M, Neuger AM, Frost TJ, Lush RM, Antonia S, and Gabrilovich DI (2006) All-Trans-Retinoic Acid Improves Differentiation of Myeloid Cells and Immune Response in Cancer Patients. Cancer Res. 66, 9299– 9307. 16982775 PMC1586106
  146. [157]Kong M, Tang J, Qiao Q, Wu T, Qi Y, Tan S, Gao X, and Zhang Z (2017) Biodegradable Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Regulating Tumor Microenvironment and Enhancing Antitumor Efficiency. Theranostics 7, 3276– 3292. 28900509 PMC5595131
  147. [158]Sasso MS, Lollo G, Pitorre M, Solito S, Pinton L, Valpione S, Bastiat G, Mandruzzato S, Bronte V, Marigo I, (2016) Low Dose Gemcitabine-Loaded Lipid Nanocapsules Target Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Potentiate Cancer Immunotherapy. Biomaterials 96, 47– 62. 27135716
  148. [159]Betts GJ, Clarke SL, Richards HE, Godkin AJ, and Gallimore AM (2006) Regulating the Immune Response to Tumours. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 58, 948– 961. 17070961
  149. [160]Sacchetti C, Rapini N, Magrini A, Cirelli E, Bellucci S, Mattei M, Rosato N, Bottini N, and Bottini M (2013) In Vivo Targeting of Intratumor Regulatory T Cells Using Peg-Modified Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Bioconjugate Chem. 24, 852– 858. 23682992
  150. [161]Ou W, Jiang L, Thapa RK, Soe ZC, Poudel K, Chang JH, Ku SK, Choi HG, Yong CS, and Kim JO (2018) Combination of Nir Therapy and Regulatory T Cell Modulation Using Layer-by-Layer Hybrid Nanoparticles for Effective Cancer Photoimmunotherapy. Theranostics 8, 4574– 4590. 30279723 PMC6160765
  151. [162]Bruder D, Probst-Kepper M, Westendorf AM, Geffers R, Beissert S, Loser K, von Boehmer H, Buer J, and Hansen W (2004) Neuropilin-1: A Surface Marker of Regulatory T Cells. Eur. J. Immunol 34, 623– 630. 14991591
  152. [163]Roth L, Agemy L, Kotamraju VR, Braun G, Teesalu T, Sugahara KN, Hamzah J, and Ruoslahti E (2012) Transtumoral Targeting Enabled by a Novel Neuropilin-Binding Peptide. Oncogene 31, 3754– 3763. 22179825
  153. [164]Ou W, Thapa RK, Jiang L, Soe ZC, Gautam M, Chang JH, Jeong JH, Ku SK, Choi HG, Yong CS, (2018) Regulatory T Cell-Targeted Hybrid Nanoparticles Combined with Immuno-Checkpoint Blockage for Cancer Immunotherapy. J. Controlled Release 281, 84– 96. 29777794
  154. [165]Zhang Y, Wei J, Xu J, Leong WS, Liu G, Ji T, Cheng Z, Wang J, Lang J, Zhao Y, (2018) Suppression of Tumor Energy Supply by Liposomal Nanoparticle-Mediated Inhibition of Aerobic Glycolysis. ACS Appl Mater. Interfaces 10, 2347– 2353. 29286239
  155. [166]Pathak RK, Marrache S, Harn DA, and Dhar S (2014) Mito-Dca: A Mitochondria Targeted Molecular Scaffold for Efficacious Delivery of Metabolic Modulator Dichloroacetate. ACS Chem. Biol 9, 1178– 1187. 24617941 PMC4033660
  156. [167]Van den Bossche J, Baardman J, and de Winther MP (2015) Metabolic Characterization of Polarized M1 and M2 Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages Using Real-Time Extracellular Flux Analysis. J. Visualized Exp, DOI: 10.3791/53424. PMC4692751 26649578 · DOI
  157. [168]Saborano R, Wongpinyochit T, Totten JD, Johnston BF, Seib FP, and Duarte IF (2017) Metabolic Reprogramming of Macrophages Exposed to Silk, Poly(Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid), and Silica Nanoparticles. Adv. Healthcare Mater 6, 1601240. 28544603
  158. [169]Yang G, Xu L, Chao Y, Xu J, Sun X, Wu Y, Peng R, and Liu Z (2017) Hollow Mno2 as a Tumor-Microenvironment-Responsive Biodegradable Nano-Platform for Combination Therapy Favoring Antitumor Immune Responses. Nat. Commun 8, 902. 29026068 PMC5638920
  159. [170]Mokwena MG, Kruger CA, Ivan MT, and Heidi A (2018) A Review of Nanoparticle Photosensitizer Drug Delivery Uptake Systems for Photodynamic Treatment of Lung Cancer. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther 22, 147– 154. 29588217
  160. [171]Bi H, Dai Y, Yang P, Xu J, Yang D, Gai S, He F, Liu B, Zhong C, An G, (2018) Glutathione Mediated Size-Tunable Ucnps-Pt(Iv)-Znfe2 O4 Nanocomposite for Multiple Bioimaging Guided Synergetic Therapy. Small 14, e1703809. 29394469
  161. [172]Treuel L, Brandholt S, Maffre P, Wiegele S, Shang L, and Nienhaus GU (2014) Impact of Protein Modification on the Protein Corona on Nanoparticles and Nanoparticle-Cell Interactions. ACS Nano 8, 503– 513. 24377255
  162. [173]Monopoli MP, Walczyk D, Campbell A, Elia G, Lynch I, Bombelli FB, and Dawson KA (2011) Physical-Chemical Aspects of Protein Corona: Relevance to in Vitro and in Vivo Biological Impacts of Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc 133, 2525– 2534. 21288025
  163. [174]Walkey CD, and Chan WC (2012) Understanding and Controlling the Interaction of Nanomaterials with Proteins in a Physiological Environment. Chem. Soc. Rev 41, 2780– 2799. 22086677
  164. [175]Monopoli MP, Aberg C, Salvati A, and Dawson KA (2012) Biomolecular Coronas Provide the Biological Identity of Nanosized Materials. Nat. Nanotechnol 7, 779– 786. 23212421
  165. [176]Simon J, Muller LK, Kokkinopoulou M, Lieberwirth I, Morsbach S, Landfester K, and Mailander V (2018) Exploiting the Biomolecular Corona: Pre-Coating of Nanoparticles Enables Controlled Cellular Interactions. Nanoscale 10, 10731– 10739. 29845991
  166. [177]Salvati A, Pitek AS, Monopoli MP, Prapainop K, Bombelli FB, Hristov DR, Kelly PM, Aberg C, Mahon E, and Dawson KA (2013) Transferrin-Functionalized Nanoparticles Lose Their Targeting Capabilities When a Biomolecule Corona Adsorbs on the Surface. Nat. Nanotechnol 8, 137– 143. 23334168
  167. [178]Tsai YS, Chen YH, Cheng PC, Tsai HT, Shiau AL, Tzai TS, and Wu CL (2013) Tgf-Beta1 Conjugated to Gold Nanoparticles Results in Protein Conformational Changes and Attenuates the Biological Function. Small 9, 2119– 2128. 23335450
  168. [179]Xiong X, Arvizo RR, Saha S, Robertson DJ, McMeekin S, Bhattacharya R, and Mukherjee P (2014) Sensitization of Ovarian Cancer Cells to Cisplatin by Gold Nanoparticles. Oncotarget 5, 6453– 6465. 25071019 PMC4171643
  169. [181]Zhang Z, Wang C, Zha Y, Hu W, Gao Z, Zang Y, Chen J, Zhang J, and Dong L (2015) Corona-Directed Nucleic Acid Delivery into Hepatic Stellate Cells for Liver Fibrosis Therapy. ACS Nano 9, 2405– 2419. 25587629
  170. [182]Hamad-Schifferli K (2015) Exploiting the Novel Properties of Protein Coronas: Emerging Applications in Nanomedicine. Nanomedicine (London, U. K.) 10, 1663– 1674. 26008198
  171. [183]Chen F, Wang G, Griffin JI, Brenneman B, Banda NK, Holers VM, Backos DS, Wu L, Moghimi SM, and Simberg D (2017) Complement Proteins Bind to Nanoparticle Protein Corona and Undergo Dynamic Exchange in Vivo. Nat. Nanotechnol 12, 387– 393. 27992410 PMC5617637
  172. [184]Setyawati MI, Tay CY, Docter D, Stauber RH, and Leong DT (2015) Understanding and Exploiting Nanoparticles’ Intimacy with the Blood Vessel and Blood. Chem. Soc. Rev 44, 8174– 8199. 26239875
  173. [185]Setyawati MI, Tay CY, Bay BH, and Leong DT (2017) Gold Nanoparticles Induced Endothelial Leakiness Depends on Particle Size and Endothelial Cell Origin. ACS Nano 11, 5020– 5030. 28422481
  174. [186]Setyawati MI, Tay CY, Chia SL, Goh SL, Fang W, Neo MJ, Chong HC, Tan SM, Loo SC, Ng KW, (2013) Titanium Dioxide Nanomaterials Cause Endothelial Cell Leakiness by Disrupting the Homophilic Interaction of Ve-Cadherin. Nat. Commun 4, 1673. 23575677
  175. [187]Setyawati MI, Mochalin VN, and Leong DT (2016) Tuning Endothelial Permeability with Functionalized Nanodiamonds. ACS Nano 10, 1170– 1181. 26643115
  176. [188]Setyawati MI, and Leong DT (2017) Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as an Antitumoral-Angiogenesis Strategy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 6690– 6703. 28150492
  177. [189]Duan J, Yu Y, Yu Y, Li Y, Huang P, Zhou X, Peng S, and Sun Z (2014) Silica Nanoparticles Enhance Autophagic Activity, Disturb Endothelial Cell Homeostasis and Impair Angiogenesis. Part. Fibre Toxicol 11, 50. 25266717 PMC4193984
  178. [190]Shen N, Zhang R, Zhang HR, Luo HY, Shen W, Gao X, Guo DZ, and Shen J (2018) Inhibition of Retinal Angiogenesis by Gold Nanoparticles Via Inducing Autophagy. Int. J. Ophthalmol 11, 1269– 1276. 30140628 PMC6090107
  179. [191]Daldrup-Link HE, Golovko D, Ruffell B, Denardo DG, Castaneda R, Ansari C, Rao J, Tikhomirov GA, Wendland MF, Corot C, (2011) Mri of Tumor-Associated Macrophages with Clinically Applicable Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. Clin. Cancer Res 17, 5695– 5704. 21791632 PMC3166957
  180. [192]Mou W, Xu Y, Ye Y, Chen S, Li X, Gong K, Liu Y, Chen Y, Li X, Tian Y, (2015) Expression of Sox2 in Breast Cancer Cells Promotes the Recruitment of M2Macrophages to Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Lett. 358, 115– 123. 25444903
  181. [193]Becker M, Muller CB, De Bastiani MA, and Klamt F (2014) The Prognostic Impact of Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Intra-Tumoral Apoptosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Histol. Histopathol 29, 21– 31. 23939555
  182. [194]Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M, Allavena P, and Sica A (2002) Macrophage Polarization: Tumor-Associated Macrophages as a Paradigm for Polarized M2Mononuclear Phagocytes. Trends Immunol. 23, 549– 555. 12401408
  183. [195]Singh Y, Pawar VK, Meher JG, Raval K, Kumar A, Shrivastava R, Bhadauria S, and Chourasia MK (2017) Targeting Tumor Associated Macrophages (Tams) Via Nanocarriers. J. Controlled Release 254, 92– 106. 28377038
  184. [196]Laskar A, Eilertsen J, Li W, and Yuan XM (2013) Spion Primes Thp1 Derived M2Macrophages Towards M1-Like Macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 441, 737– 742. 24184477
  185. [197]Fuchs AK, Syrovets T, Haas KA, Loos C, Musyanovych A, Mailander V, Landfester K, and Simmet T (2016) Carboxyl- and Amino-Functionalized Polystyrene Nanoparticles Differentially Affect the Polarization Profile of M1 and M2Macrophage Subsets. Biomaterials 85, 78– 87. 26854393
  186. [198]Hoppstadter J, Seif M, Dembek A, Cavelius C, Huwer H, Kraegeloh A, and Kiemer AK (2015) M2 Polarization Enhances Silica Nanoparticle Uptake by Macrophages. Front. Pharmacol 6, 55. 25852557 PMC4369656
  187. [199]Zhu Z, Scalfi-Happ C, Ryabova A, Grafe S, Wiehe A, Peter RU, Loschenov V, Steiner R, and Wittig R (2018) Photodynamic Activity of Temoporfin Nanoparticles Induces a Shift to the M1-Like Phenotype in M2-Polarized Macrophages. J. Photochem. Photobiol., B 185, 215– 222. 29966988
  188. [200]Su L, Zhang W, Wu X, Zhang Y, Chen X, Liu G, Chen G, and Jiang M (2015) Glycocalyx-Mimicking Nanoparticles for Stimulation and Polarization of Macrophages Via Specific Interactions. Small 11, 4191– 4200. 25994111
  189. [201]Miao X, Leng X, and Zhang Q (2017) The Current State of Nanoparticle-Induced Macrophage Polarization and Reprogramming Research. Int. J. Mol. Sci 18, 336. PMC5343871 28178185
  190. [202]Huang YJ, Hung KC, Hung HS, and Hsu SH (2018) Modulation of Macrophage Phenotype by Biodegradable Polyurethane Nanoparticles: Possible Relation between Macrophage Polarization and Immune Response of Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 19436– 19448. 29775050
  191. [203]Marquardt C, Fritsch-Decker S, Al-Rawi M, Diabate S, and Weiss C (2017) Autophagy Induced by Silica Nanoparticles Protects Raw264.7 Macrophages from Cell Death. Toxicology 379, 40– 47. 28161448
  192. [204]Oh N, and Park JH (2014) Surface Chemistry of Gold Nanoparticles Mediates Their Exocytosis in Macrophages. ACS Nano 8, 6232– 6241. 24836308
  193. [205]Shiga K, Hara M, Nagasaki T, Sato T, Takahashi H, and Takeyama H (2015) Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts: Their Characteristics and Their Roles in Tumor Growth. Cancers 7, 2443– 2458. 26690480 PMC4695902
  194. [207]Vieira LFA, Lins MP, Viana I, Dos Santos JE, Smaniotto S, and Reis M (2017) Metallic Nanoparticles Reduce the Migration of Human Fibroblasts in Vitro. Nanoscale Res. Lett 12, 200. 28314368 PMC5355407
  195. [208]Harhaji L, Isakovic A, Raicevic N, Markovic Z, Todorovic-Markovic B, Nikolic N, Vranjes-Djuric S, Markovic I,and Trajkovic V (2007) Multiple Mechanisms Underlying the Anticancer Action of Nanocrystalline Fullerene. Eur. J. Pharmacol 568, 89– 98. 17560995
  196. [209]Zhang Q, Yang W, Man N, Zheng F, Shen Y, Sun K, Li Y, and Wen LP (2009) Autophagy-Mediated Chemosensitization in Cancer Cells by Fullerene C60 Nanocrystal. Autophagy 5, 1107– 1117. 19786831
  197. [210]Man N, Yu L, Yu SH, and Wen LP (2010) Rare Earth Oxide Nanocrystals as a New Class of Autophagy Inducers. Autophagy 6, 310. 20104026
  198. [211]Zhao Y, Howe JL, Yu Z, Leong DT, Chu JJ, Loo JS, and Ng KW (2013) Exposure to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Induces Autophagy in Primary Human Keratinocytes. Small 9, 387392. 23090781
  199. [212]Stern ST, Zolnik BS, McLeland CB, Clogston J, Zheng J, and McNeil SE (2008) Induction of Autophagy in Porcine Kidney Cells by Quantum Dots: A Common Cellular Response to Nanomaterials? Toxicol. Sci 106, 140– 152. 18632727 PMC2563140
  200. [213]Chen Y, Yang L, Feng C, and Wen LP (2005) Nano Neodymium Oxide Induces Massive Vacuolization and Autophagic Cell Death in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Nci-H460 Cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 337, 52– 60. 16185655

200 of 220 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huai, Y., Hossen, M. N., Wilhelm, S., Bhattacharya, R., & Mukherjee, P.
Affiliations
OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Mukherjee, Priyabrata
Venue
Bioconjugate Chemistry
Published
2019-08-13
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
2247-2263
ISSN
  • 1043-1802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4812
OpenAlex
W2968892674
Cited by
113
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioconjugate Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (2CA136494, 1R01 CA220237-01A1, CA213278)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Keywords
tumor microenvironment, nanoparticles, cancer nanotherapy, hypoxia, acidosis, tumor vasculature, nanoparticle interactions, tumor pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Nanoparticles, Immunomodulation, Tumor Microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review