111In- and IRDye800CW-Labeled PLA–PEG Nanoparticle for Imaging Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Expressing Tissues
Open accessAbstract
Targeted delivery of drug-encapsulated nanoparticles is a promising new approach to safe and effective therapeutics for cancer. Here we investigate the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted nanoparticle based on a poly(lactic acid)-polyethylene glycol copolymer by utilizing single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and fluorescence imaging of a low-molecular-weight, PSMA-targeting moiety attached to the surface and oriented toward the outside environment. Tissue biodistribution of the radioactive, PSMA-targeted nanoparticles in mice containing PSMA(+) PC3 PIP and PSMA(-) PC3 flu (control) tumors demonstrated similar accumulation compared to the untargeted particles within all tissues except for the tumor and liver by 96 h postinjection. For PSMA(+) PC3 PIP tumor, the targeted nanoparticle demonstrated retention of 6.58% injected dose (ID)/g at 48 h and remained nearly at that level out to 96 h, whereas the untargeted nanoparticle showed a 48 h retention of 8.17% ID/g followed by a significant clearance to 2.37% ID/g at 96 h (P < 0.02). On the other hand, for control tumor, both targeted and untargeted particles displayed similar 48 h retentions and rates of clearance over 96 h. Ex vivo microscopic analysis with near-infrared versions of the nanoparticles indicated retention within PSMA(+) tumor epithelial cells as well as tumor-associated macrophages for targeted particles and primarily macrophage-associated uptake for the untargeted particles. Retention in control tumor was primarily associated with tumor vasculature and macrophages. The data demonstrate the utility of radioimaging to assess nanoparticle biodistribution and suggest that active targeting has a modest positive effect on tumor localization of PSMA-targeted PLA-PEG nanoparticles that have been derivatized for imaging.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Imaging agents have been encapsulated within or conjugated to NPs and imaged utilizing different imaging techniques for visualization and quantification of nanodrug circulation behavior, biodistribution, and target tumor aggregation.
“For visualization and quantification of nanodrug circulation behavior, biodistribution, and target tumor aggregation, imaging agents have been encapsulated within or conjugated to NPs and imaging them utilizing different imaging techniques [129].”
From Approaches to Improve EPR-Based Drug Delivery for Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis (2023) · cites this paper as [129]
The Experimental Section describes attaching fluorescent dye to nanoparticles, and the Results use SPECT-CT and fluorescence imaging to assess biodistribution and tumor uptake. The Introduction also links imaging to pharmacokinetics and particle uptake. Our copy does not show an imaging agent encapsulated within a nanoparticle, so it supports the conjugation example but not both preparation methods in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Banerjee, S. R., Foss, C. A., Horhota, A., Pullambhatla, M., McDonnell, K., Zale, S., & Pomper, M. G.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- BIND Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
- Corresponding author
- Pomper, Martin G.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-12-21
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-209
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- PMC
- PMC5516902
- OpenAlex
- W2557458575
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biomacromolecules (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (CA058236, CA134675, CA151838, CA183031, CA184228, K25 CA148901)
- Bind Therapeutics, Inc.
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
- Keywords
- prostate-specific membrane antigen, nanoparticle biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, prostate cancer imaging, PC-3 cells, tumor-associated macrophages, tumor vasculature, near-infrared fluorescence imaging, SPECT imaging, active targeting, tumor localization
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antigens, Surface, Benzenesulfonates, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Indium Radioisotopes, Indoles, Male, Mice, Nude, Polyethylene Glycols, Polymers, Prostatic Neoplasms, Tissue Distribution, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Mice, SCID, Mice, Inbred NOD, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Radiopharmaceuticals, Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II, Mice, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review