Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proton Conductivities in Functionalized UiO-66: Tuned Properties, Thermogravimetry Mass, and Molecular Simulation Analyses

Yang, Fan, Huang, Hongliang, Wang, Xiayan, Li, Fan, Gong, Yuhan, Zhong, Chongli, Li, Jian-Rong·2015·Crystal Growth & Design

Abstract

Pursuing new proton-conducting materials has become a key issue to improve the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells for clean energy. As newly emerging materials, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been attracting wide attention in this regard. Herein, using stable UiO-66 as a platform, through the modification of different functional groups of −SO 3 H, −2COOH, −NH 2, and −Br in ligands, we explore the strategy to tune the proton conductivities of MOFs. With the highly acidic and strong hydrophilic functional groups −SO 3 H and −COOH, UiO-66-SO 3 H and UiO-66-2COOH show quite high proton conductivities of 0.34 × 10 –2 and 0.10 × 10 –2 S cm –1 at 303 K and ∼97% relative humidity, respectively while the −NH 2, −H, and −Br represent comparatively low conductivities under the same conditions. Furthermore, water molecules adsorbed in the pores are proved to contribute greatly to the proton conductivities of these MOFs. Thermogravimetry-mass spectrometry (TG-MS) and molecular simulations are then used to analyze the interactions between the water molecules and MOFs. TG-MS analyses show two water molecule loss processes in UiO-66-SO 3 H and UiO-66-2COOH, but one in UiO-66-NH 2, UiO-66, and UiO-66-Br during heating, which indicates the stronger affinity of −SO 3 H and −COOH functionalized UiO-66 toward water molecules than those with −NH 2 and −Br, as well as UiO-66 itself. The isosteric heats (− Q st ) of water adsorption and radial distribution functions (RDFs) in these MOFs are also evaluated by molecular simulations. It was found that UiO-66-SO 3 H and UiO-66-2COOH have higher − Q st of 86.50 and 52.10 kJ mol –1, whereas UiO-66-NH 2, UiO-66, and UiO-66-Br have lower ones, 34.03, 19.04, and 36.36 kJ mol –1, respectively. The RDFs reveal the formation of hydrogen-bonding networks in UiO-66-SO 3 H, UiO-66-2COOH, UiO-66-NH 2, and UiO-66, but not in UiO-66-Br.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01190

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Yang, F., Huang, H., Wang, X., Li, F., Gong, Y., Zhong, C., & Li, J.-R.
Venue
Crystal Growth & Design
Published
2015-11-19
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
5827-5833
ISSN
  • 1528-7483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-7505
OpenAlex
W2475709140
Cited by
276
References
1
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proton Conductivities in Functionalized UiO-66: Tuned Properties, Thermogravimetry Mass, and Molecular Simulation Analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01190
The paper
Yang, F., Huang, H., Wang, X., Li, F., Gong, Y., Zhong, C., & Li, J.-R. (2015). Proton Conductivities in Functionalized UiO-66: Tuned Properties, Thermogravimetry Mass, and Molecular Simulation Analyses. Crystal Growth & Design. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01190

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.