The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proton Conductivities in Functionalized UiO-66: Tuned Properties, Thermogravimetry Mass, and Molecular Simulation Analyses
Abstract
Pursuing new proton-conducting materials has become a key issue to improve the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells for clean energy. As newly emerging materials, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been attracting wide attention in this regard. Herein, using stable UiO-66 as a platform, through the modification of different functional groups of −SO 3 H, −2COOH, −NH 2, and −Br in ligands, we explore the strategy to tune the proton conductivities of MOFs. With the highly acidic and strong hydrophilic functional groups −SO 3 H and −COOH, UiO-66-SO 3 H and UiO-66-2COOH show quite high proton conductivities of 0.34 × 10 –2 and 0.10 × 10 –2 S cm –1 at 303 K and ∼97% relative humidity, respectively while the −NH 2, −H, and −Br represent comparatively low conductivities under the same conditions. Furthermore, water molecules adsorbed in the pores are proved to contribute greatly to the proton conductivities of these MOFs. Thermogravimetry-mass spectrometry (TG-MS) and molecular simulations are then used to analyze the interactions between the water molecules and MOFs. TG-MS analyses show two water molecule loss processes in UiO-66-SO 3 H and UiO-66-2COOH, but one in UiO-66-NH 2, UiO-66, and UiO-66-Br during heating, which indicates the stronger affinity of −SO 3 H and −COOH functionalized UiO-66 toward water molecules than those with −NH 2 and −Br, as well as UiO-66 itself. The isosteric heats (− Q st ) of water adsorption and radial distribution functions (RDFs) in these MOFs are also evaluated by molecular simulations. It was found that UiO-66-SO 3 H and UiO-66-2COOH have higher − Q st of 86.50 and 52.10 kJ mol –1, whereas UiO-66-NH 2, UiO-66, and UiO-66-Br have lower ones, 34.03, 19.04, and 36.36 kJ mol –1, respectively. The RDFs reveal the formation of hydrogen-bonding networks in UiO-66-SO 3 H, UiO-66-2COOH, UiO-66-NH 2, and UiO-66, but not in UiO-66-Br.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal–organic frameworks as platforms for clean energy
Li, S.-L., & Xu, Q. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee40507a · Cited by 970
Cited by
Proton-conducting crystalline porous materials
Meng, X., Wang, H.-N., Song, S.-Y., & Zhang, H.-J. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00528d · Cited by 697
Proton Transport in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Lim, D.-W., & Kitagawa, H. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00842 · Cited by 689
Linker functionalized metal-organic frameworks
Ali Akbar Razavi, S., & Morsali, A. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213023 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, F., Huang, H., Wang, X., Li, F., Gong, Y., Zhong, C., & Li, J.-R.
- Venue
- Crystal Growth & Design
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-11-19
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5827-5833
- ISSN
- 1528-7483 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-7505
- OpenAlex
- W2475709140
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proton Conductivities in Functionalized UiO-66: Tuned Properties, Thermogravimetry Mass, and Molecular Simulation Analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01190
- The paper
- Yang, F., Huang, H., Wang, X., Li, F., Gong, Y., Zhong, C., & Li, J.-R. (2015). Proton Conductivities in Functionalized UiO-66: Tuned Properties, Thermogravimetry Mass, and Molecular Simulation Analyses. Crystal Growth & Design. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.