The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the Energetic Driving Force for Cocrystal Formation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We present a periodic density functional theory study of the stability of 350 organic cocrystals relative to their pure single-component structures, the largest study of cocrystals yet performed with high-level computational methods. Our calculations demonstrate that cocrystals are on average 8 kJ mol–1 more stable than their constituent single-component structures and are very rarely (<5% of cases) less stable; cocrystallization is almost always a thermodynamically favorable process. We consider the variation in stability between different categories of systems─hydrogen-bonded, halogen-bonded, and weakly bound cocrystals─finding that, contrary to chemical intuition, the presence of hydrogen or halogen bond interactions is not necessarily a good predictor of stability. Finally, we investigate the correlation of the relative stability with simple chemical descriptors: changes in packing efficiency and hydrogen bond strength. We find some broad qualitative agreement with chemical intuition─more densely packed cocrystals with stronger hydrogen bonding tend to be more stable─but the relationship is weak, suggesting that such simple descriptors do not capture the complex balance of interactions driving cocrystallization. Our conclusions suggest that while cocrystallization is often a thermodynamically favorable process, it remains difficult to formulate general rules to guide synthesis, highlighting the continued importance of high-level computation in predicting and rationalizing such systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
The Cambridge Structural Database
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P., & Ward, S. C. (2016) · Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials · doi:10.1107/s2052520616003954 · Cited by 10,297
Cited by
A Practical Guide to the Design of Molecular Crystals
Corpinot, M. K., & Bučar, D.-K. (2019) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00972 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, C. R., & Day, G. M.
- Venue
- Crystal Growth & Design
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-12-28
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 892-904
- ISSN
- 1528-7483 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-7505
- OpenAlex
- W2774535559
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.