Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preparation of Gallium Sulfide Nanosheets by Liquid Exfoliation and Their Application As Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts

Open access
Harvey, Andrew, Backes, Claudia, Gholamvand, Zahra, Hanlon, Damien, McAteer, David, Nerl, Hannah C., McGuire, Eva, Seral-Ascaso, Andrés, Ramasse, Quentin M., McEvoy, Niall, Winters, Sinéad, Berner, Nina C., McCloskey, David, Donegan, John F., Duesberg, Georg S., Nicolosi, Valeria, Coleman, Jonathan N.·2015·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Here, we demonstrate the production of large quantities of gallium sulfide (GaS) nanosheets by liquid exfoliation of layered GaS powder. The exfoliation was achieved by sonication of the powder in suitable solvents. The variation of dispersed concentration with solvent was consistent with classical solution thermodynamics and showed successful solvents to be those with Hildebrand solubility parameters close to 21.5 MPa 1/2 . In this way, nanosheets could be produced at concentrations of up to ∼0.2 mg/mL with lateral sizes and thicknesses of 50–1000 nm and 3–80 layers, respectively. The nanosheets appeared to be relatively defect-free although oxygen was observed in the vicinity of the edges. Using controlled centrifugation techniques, it was possible to prepare dispersions containing size-selected nanosheets. Spectroscopic measurements showed the optical properties of the dispersions to vary strongly with nanosheet size, allowing the elucidation of spectroscopic metrics for in situ estimation of nanosheet size and thickness. These techniques allow the production of nanosheets with controlled sizes, which will be important for certain applications. To demonstrate this, we prepared films of GaS nanosheets of three different sizes for use as hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts. We found a clear correlation between performance and size, showing small nanosheets to be more effective. This is consistent with the catalytically active sites residing on the nanosheet edges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00910

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Harvey, A., Backes, C., Gholamvand, Z., Hanlon, D., McAteer, D., Nerl, H. C., McGuire, E., Seral-Ascaso, A., Ramasse, Q. M., McEvoy, N., Winters, S., Berner, N. C., McCloskey, D., Donegan, J. F., Duesberg, G. S., Nicolosi, V., & Coleman, J. N.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2015-04-21
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
3483-3493
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2036950027
Cited by
247
References
2
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparation of Gallium Sulfide Nanosheets by Liquid Exfoliation and Their Application As Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00910
The paper
Harvey, A., Backes, C., Gholamvand, Z., Hanlon, D., McAteer, D., Nerl, H. C., McGuire, E., Seral-Ascaso, A., Ramasse, Q. M., McEvoy, N., Winters, S., Berner, N. C., McCloskey, D., Donegan, J. F., Duesberg, G. S., Nicolosi, V., & Coleman, J. N. (2015). Preparation of Gallium Sulfide Nanosheets by Liquid Exfoliation and Their Application As Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00910

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.