The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Porous Organic Cages for Gas Chromatography Separations
Open accessAbstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCommunicationNEXTPorous Organic Cages for Gas Chromatography SeparationsAdam Kewley, Andrew Stephenson, Linjiang Chen, Michael E. Briggs, Tom Hasell, and Andrew I. Cooper*View Author Information Department of Chemistry and Centre for Materials Discovery, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZD, United Kingdom*E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 9, 3207–3210Publication Date (Web):April 6, 2015Publication History Received25 March 2015Published online27 April 2015Published inissue 12 May 2015https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01112Copyright © 2015 American Chemical SocietyRIGHTS & PERMISSIONSACS AuthorChoicewith CC-BYlicenseArticle Views43320Altmetric-Citations152LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit PDF (1 MB) Get e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (1)»Supporting Information Supporting Information SUBJECTS:Alcohols,Chromatography,Metal organic frameworks,Mixtures,Molecular structure Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cyclodextrins and their uses: a review
Del Valle, E. M. M. (2004) · Process Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0032-9592(03)00258-9 · Cited by 3,375
Cited by
Porous organic cages: soluble, modular and molecular pores
Hasell, T., & Cooper, A. I. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.53 · Cited by 845
Self-citationShaikh, R. R., Pornpraprom, S., & D’Elia, V. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b03580 · Cited by 729
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Food Safety
Wang, P.-L., Xie, L.-H., Joseph, E. A., Li, J.-R., Su, X.-O., & Zhou, H.-C. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00257 · Cited by 533
Beuerle, F., & Gole, B. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201710190 · Cited by 528
Chiral covalent organic frameworks: design, synthesis and property
Han, X., Yuan, C., Hou, B., Liu, L., Li, H., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00009d · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Kewley, A., Stephenson, A., Chen, L., Briggs, M. E., Hasell, T., & Cooper, A. I.
- Venue
- Chemistry of Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-04-27
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3207-3210
- ISSN
- 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5002
- OpenAlex
- W2335233613
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Porous Organic Cages for Gas Chromatography Separations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01112
- The paper
- Kewley, A., Stephenson, A., Chen, L., Briggs, M. E., Hasell, T., & Cooper, A. I. (2015). Porous Organic Cages for Gas Chromatography Separations. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
