Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sol–Gel Processing of Metal–Organic Frameworks

Sumida, Kenji, Liang, Kang, Reboul, Julien, Ibarra, Ilich A., Furukawa, Shuhei, Falcaro, Paolo·2017·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Sol–gel processing represents a powerful and versatile strategy for the preparation of functional inorganic and hybrid materials that facilitate control over the molecular composition, as well as organization of the materials at the various length scales relevant to fundamental and applied research. Recent advances have enabled its use for the processing of an emerging class of functional porous materials called metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Here, sol–gel approaches can be employed for the direct manipulation of MOFs, or as a route to the construction of composite materials where the properties of the MOF are synergistically combined with those of a carefully chosen inorganic phase. In this review, we present the most significant progress made in this emerging area, according to four main synthetic strategies, with a particular focus on describing how sol–gel processing enhances the functionalities of the MOF. These strategies include (1) molecular scale manipulations of the pore surfaces of MOFs with sol–gel precursors; (2) the controlled positioning or growth of MOF crystals on inorganic surfaces; (3) the use of MOF crystals as templates for sol–gel processes (either within the pores, or at the external surfaces); and (4) the use of sol–gel-derived sacrificial inorganic templates for the structuring of MOF-based architectures. Each of these processing methods imparts unique properties to the systems and provides a route to higher-order architectures and material compositions not accessible through conventional approaches to MOF synthesis. Sol–gel processing provides promising routes toward new functional materials that display enhanced properties and are expected to play an important role in allowing MOFs to be optimized for specific applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03934

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Sumida, K., Liang, K., Reboul, J., Ibarra, I. A., Furukawa, S., & Falcaro, P.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2017-03-10
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
2626-2645
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2571107022
Cited by
172
References
0
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sol–Gel Processing of Metal–Organic Frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03934
The paper
Sumida, K., Liang, K., Reboul, J., Ibarra, I. A., Furukawa, S., & Falcaro, P. (2017). Sol–Gel Processing of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03934

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.