Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artifacts and Errors Associated with the Ubiquitous Presence of Fluorescent Impurities in Carbon Nanodots

Essner, Jeremy B., Kist, Jennifer A., Polo-Parada, Luis, Baker, Gary A.·2018·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

Fluorescent carbon dots have attracted tremendous attention owing to their superlative optical properties which suggest opportunities for replacing conventional fluorescent materials in various application fields. Not surprisingly, the rapid pace of publication has been accompanied by a host of critical issues, errors, controversies, and misconceptions associated with these emergent materials, which present significant barriers to elucidating their true nature, substantially hindering the extensive exploitation of these nanomaterials. Of particular interest are expedient, bottom-up pathways to carbon dots starting from molecular precursors (e.g., citric acid, amino acids, and alkylamines), although such routes are associated with generation of a ubiquity of small molecular weight or oligomeric fluorescent byproducts. A primary obstacle to progress is the inadequacy of purification in reported studies, an omission which gives rise to misconceptions about the nature and characteristics of the carbon dots. In this work, we conducted a series of carbon dot syntheses using facile hydrothermal and microwave routes employing citric acid (paired with urea or ethylenediamine as a nitrogen source), followed by dialysis or ultrafiltration purification steps. Careful comparison and analysis of the optical properties of the resulting purification products (i.e., dialysate/filtrate versus retentate fractions) affirms the formation of molecular fluorophores (potentially oligomeric or polymeric in nature) during the bottom-up chemical synthesis which contribute a majority of the emission from carbon dot samples. We provide clear evidence showing that the fluorescent impurities produced as byproducts of carbon dot synthesis must be rigorously removed to obtain reliable results. On the basis of our findings, the inadequate purification in many reports calls into question published work, suggesting that many previous studies will need to be carefully revisited using more rigorous purification protocols. Of course, deficiencies in purification in prior studies only add to the ongoing debate on carbon dot structure and the origin of their emission. Moving forward, rigorous and consistent purification steps will need to be uniformly implemented, a tactical change that will help pave the way toward the development of carbon dots as next-generation agents for cellular imaging, solid-state and full-color lighting, photovoltaics, catalysis, and (bio)sensing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04446

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Metadata

Authors
Essner, J. B., Kist, J. A., Polo-Parada, L., & Baker, G. A.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2018-02-15
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
1878-1887
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2785893013
Cited by
316
References
3
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artifacts and Errors Associated with the Ubiquitous Presence of Fluorescent Impurities in Carbon Nanodots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04446
The paper
Essner, J. B., Kist, J. A., Polo-Parada, L., & Baker, G. A. (2018). Artifacts and Errors Associated with the Ubiquitous Presence of Fluorescent Impurities in Carbon Nanodots. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04446

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.