Cited by 226Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Ultrafine Pt Nanoparticle-Decorated 3D Hybrid Architectures Built from Reduced Graphene Oxide and MXene Nanosheets for Methanol Oxidation

Yang, Cuizhen, Jiang, Quanguo, Li, Weihua, He, Haiyan, Yang, Lu, Lu, Zhiyong, Huang, Huajie·2019·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

The design and construction of high-performance platinum-based electrode catalysts with acceptable cost are the keys to advances in the field of direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs). Herein, we report an efficient bottom-up approach for the large-scale production of ultrafine Pt NP-decorated 3D hybrid architectures by employing graphene (RGO) and MXene (Ti 3 C 2 T x ) nanosheets as cobuilding blocks. Benefiting from their distinct structural merits, such as highly interconnected porous carbon networks, large specific surface areas, homogeneous metallic Pt dispersion, and good electron conductivity, the resulting 3D Pt/RGO–Ti 3 C 2 T x architectures express surprisingly high catalytic activity, reliable long-term stability, and strong poison tolerance as they are utilized as anode DMFC catalysts, which are more competitive than those for conventional Pt catalysts supported by carbon black, carbon nanotube, RGO, and Ti 3 C 2 T x materials. Density functional theory calculation further reveals an optimized band structure of the RGO–Ti 3 C 2 T x support as well as its strong electronic interactions with Pt NPs, which are essential for the exceptional electrocatalytic properties toward methanol oxidation reaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02115

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lattice fringe of 0.225 nm is attributed to the (111) plane of Pt, indicating small Pt nanoclusters with an average size of 2 nm have been synthesized.

    “Meanwhile, the lattice fringe of 0.225 nm could be attributed to the (111) plane of Pt, indicating some small Pt nanoclusters with an average size of 2 nm have been synthesized [29].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, C., Jiang, Q., Li, W., He, H., Yang, L., Lu, Z., & Huang, H.
Affiliations
  • Hohai University (CN)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Weihua
  • Huang, Huajie
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2019-10-23
Volume
31
Issue
22
Pages
9277-9287
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2981986838
Cited by
226
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemistry of Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (2017B05614, 2019B16214, 2019B66614)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M580387, 2016T90414)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51802077)
  • Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (1601026A)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
platinum nanoparticles, reduced graphene oxide, MXene, Ti3C2Tx, methanol oxidation, direct methanol fuel cells, electrocatalysts, bottom-up synthesis, porous carbon network, electronic interaction, electronic band structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review