Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 678

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1,144 of the 1,144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Amyloid Oligomers: A Joint Experimental/Computational Perspective on Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, Type II Diabetes, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Open access
Nguyen, Phuong H., Ramamoorthy, Ayyalusamy, Sahoo, Bikash R., Zheng, Jie, Faller, Peter, Straub, John E., Dominguez, Laura, Shea, Joan-Emma, Dokholyan, Nikolay V., De Simone, Alfonso, Ma, Buyong, Nussinov, Ruth, Najafi, Saeed, Ngo, Son Tung, Loquet, Antoine, Chiricotto, Mara, Ganguly, Pritam, McCarty, James, Li, Mai Suan, Hall, Carol, Wang, Yiming, Miller, Yifat, Melchionna, Simone, Habenstein, Birgit, Timr, Stepan, Chen, Jiaxing, Hnath, Brianna, Strodel, Birgit, Kayed, Rakez, Lesné, Sylvain, Wei, Guanghong, Sterpone, Fabio, Doig, Andrew J., Derreumaux, Philippe·2021·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

Protein misfolding and aggregation is observed in many amyloidogenic diseases affecting either the central nervous system or a variety of peripheral tissues. Structural and dynamic characterization of all species along the pathways from monomers to fibrils is challenging by experimental and computational means because they involve intrinsically disordered proteins in most diseases. Yet understanding how amyloid species become toxic is the challenge in developing a treatment for these diseases. Here we review what computer, in vitro, in vivo, and pharmacological experiments tell us about the accumulation and deposition of the oligomers of the (Aβ, tau), α-synuclein, IAPP, and superoxide dismutase 1 proteins, which have been the mainstream concept underlying Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), type II diabetes (T2D), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) research, respectively, for many years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01122

Cites

1144 of 1144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

4 retracted

Show all 1,144 references

Cited by

See all 678

Metadata

Authors
Nguyen, P. H., Ramamoorthy, A., Sahoo, B. R., Zheng, J., Faller, P., Straub, J. E., Dominguez, L., Shea, J.-E., Dokholyan, N. V., De Simone, A., Ma, B., Nussinov, R., Najafi, S., Ngo, S. T., Loquet, A., Chiricotto, M., Ganguly, P., McCarty, J., Li, M. S., Hall, C., Wang, Y., Miller, Y., Melchionna, S., Habenstein, B., Timr, S., Chen, J., Hnath, B., Strodel, B., Kayed, R., Lesné, S., Wei, G., Sterpone, F., Doig, A. J., & Derreumaux, P.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2021-02-05
Volume
121
Issue
4
Pages
2545-2647
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W3127602688
Cited by
678
References
1,144
FWCI
22.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amyloid Oligomers: A Joint Experimental/Computational Perspective on Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, Type II Diabetes, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01122
The paper
Nguyen, P. H., Ramamoorthy, A., Sahoo, B. R., Zheng, J., Faller, P., Straub, J. E., Dominguez, L., Shea, J.-E., Dokholyan, N. V., De Simone, A., Ma, B., Nussinov, R., Najafi, S., Ngo, S. T., Loquet, A., Chiricotto, M., Ganguly, P., McCarty, J., Li, M. S., . . . Derreumaux, P. (2021). Amyloid Oligomers: A Joint Experimental/Computational Perspective on Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, Type II Diabetes, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01122

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.