Cited by 316Catalysts for Methane ReformingMembrane Separation and Gas TransportMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

Postextraction Separation, On-Board Storage, and Catalytic Conversion of Methane in Natural Gas: A Review

Saha, Dipendu, Grappe, Hippolyte A., Chakraborty, Amlan, Orkoulas, Gerassimos·2016·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

In today's perspective, natural gas has gained considerable attention, due to its low emission, indigenous availability, and improvement in the extraction technology. Upon extraction, it undergoes several purification protocols including dehydration, sweetening, and inert rejection. Although purification is a commercially established technology, several drawbacks of the current process provide an essential impetus for developing newer separation protocols, most importantly, adsorption and membrane separation. This Review summarizes the needs of natural gas separation, gives an overview of the current technology, and provides a detailed discussion of the progress in research on separation and purification of natural gas including the benefits and drawbacks of each of the processes. The transportation sector is another growing sector of natural gas utilization, and it requires an efficient and safe on-board storage system. Compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) are the most common forms in which natural gas can be stored. Adsorbed natural gas (ANG) is an alternate storage system of natural gas, which is advantageous as compared to CNG and LNG in terms of safety and also in terms of temperature and pressure requirements. This Review provides a detailed discussion on ANG along with computation predictions. The catalytic conversion of methane to different useful chemicals including syngas, methanol, formaldehyde, dimethyl ether, heavier hydrocarbons, aromatics, and hydrogen is also reviewed. Finally, direct utilization of methane onto fuel cells is also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00745

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Natural gas main component is usually CH4 (30-98%), with other components (CO2, light hydrocarbons, H2O, H2S) present in variable amounts.

    “Natural gas, a fossil fuel where the main component is usually CH4 (30–98%), and the other components (CO2, light hydrocarbons, H2O, and H2S) are present in variable amounts.450,462−464”
  • Adsorption (PSA) and membrane technologies have potential to be much less energy intensive and to reduce operation costs significantly for CO2 separation from methane.

    “Adsorption (more specifically PSA, pressure swing adsorption) and membrane technologies have the potential to be much less energy intensive and to reduce the operation costs significantly.449−451,463,483,484”
  • Traditional A-, X-, and Y-type zeolites have been commercialized or patented for CO2 separation from methane, as well as silicalite, mordenite, natural clinoptilolite, and titanosilicate ETS-4.

    “Traditional A-, X-, and Y-type zeolites have been commercialized or patented for this separation,463,487,488 as well as silicalite, mordenite,489 natural clinoptilolite,490 and titanosilicate ETS-4.451,491−494”
  • PSA processes for CO2 separation from methane have been studied on zeolites, MOFs, carbon molecular sieves, activated carbons, porous polymers, and amine-impregnated mesoporous silica.

    “PSA processes for carbon dioxide separation from methane have been studied on a wide range of materials, such as zeolites, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), carbon molecular sieves, activated carbons, porous polymers, or amine-impregnated mesoporous silica.449,451,463,485,486”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saha, D., Grappe, H. A., Chakraborty, A., & Orkoulas, G.
Affiliations
  • Widener University (US)
  • RMX Technologies, 835 Innovation Drive, Suite 200, Knoxville, Tennessee 37932, United States
  • Entegris (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Saha, Dipendu
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2016-08-24
Volume
116
Issue
19
Pages
11436-11499
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2517809103
Cited by
316
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (54205-UNI10)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
natural gas purification, methane separation, adsorption separation, membrane separation, adsorbed natural gas, compressed natural gas, liquefied natural gas, natural gas dehydration, natural gas sweetening, syngas production, methanol synthesis, dimethyl ether, aromatic compounds, hydrogen production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review