The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research Development on K-Ion Batteries
Abstract
Li-ion batteries (LIBs), commercialized in 1991, have the highest energy density among practical secondary batteries and are widely utilized in electronics, electric vehicles, and even stationary energy storage systems. Along with the expansion of their demand and application, concern about the resources of Li and Co is growing. Therefore, secondary batteries composed of earth-abundant elements are desired to complement LIBs. In recent years, K-ion batteries (KIBs) have attracted significant attention as potential alternatives to LIBs. Previous studies have developed positive and negative electrode materials for KIBs and demonstrated several unique advantages of KIBs over LIBs and Na-ion batteries (NIBs). Thus, besides being free from any scarce/toxic elements, the low standard electrode potentials of K/K + electrodes lead to high operation voltages competitive to those observed in LIBs. Moreover, K + ions exhibit faster ionic diffusion in electrolytes due to weaker interaction with solvents and anions than that of Li + ions; this is essential to realize high-power KIBs. This review comprehensively covers the studies on electrochemical materials for KIBs, including electrode and electrolyte materials and a discussion on recent achievements and remaining/emerging issues. The review also includes insights into electrode reactions and solid-state ionics and nonaqueous solution chemistry as well as perspectives on the research-based development of KIBs compared to those of LIBs and NIBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Phenomenological Theory of Ion Solvation. Effective Radii of Hydrated Ions
Nightingale, E. R. (1959) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j150579a011 · Cited by 3,505
A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries
Vaalma, C., Buchholz, D., Weil, M., & Passerini, S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2018.13 · Cited by 2,613
Synthesis of hard carbon from argan shells for Na-ion batteries
Dahbi, M., Kiso, M., Kubota, K., Horiba, T., Chafik, T., Hida, K., Matsuyama, T., & Komaba, S. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta01394a · Cited by 347
Self-citation
Cited by
Surface-substituted Prussian blue analogue cathode for sustainable potassium-ion batteries
Ge, J., Fan, L., Rao, A. M., Zhou, J., & Lu, B. (2021) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00810-7 · Cited by 544
Chen, X., Tang, Z., Gao, H., Chen, S., & Wang, G. (2020) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2020.101208 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosaka, T., Kubota, K., Hameed, A. S., & Komaba, S.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-01-15
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 6358-6466
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W2998849754
- Cited by
- 1,346
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research Development on K-Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00463
- The paper
- Hosaka, T., Kubota, K., Hameed, A. S., & Komaba, S. (2020). Research Development on K-Ion Batteries. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00463
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.