The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classical and Emerging Characterization Techniques for Investigation of Ion Transport Mechanisms in Crystalline Fast Ionic Conductors
Abstract
) in a solid crystalline framework can move as fast as in liquids. This property, although only observed in a limited number of materials, is a key enabler for a broad range of technologies, including batteries, fuel cells, and sensors. However, the mechanisms of ion transport in the crystal lattice of fast ionic conductors are still not fully understood despite the substantial progress achieved in the last 40 years, partly because of the wide range of length and time scales involved in the complex migration processes of ions in solids. Without a comprehensive understanding of these ion transport mechanisms, the rational design of new fast ionic conductors is not possible. In this review, we cover classical and emerging characterization techniques (both experimental and computational) that can be used to investigate ion transport processes in bulk crystalline inorganic materials which exhibit predominant ion conduction (i.e., negligible electronic conductivity) with a primary focus on literature published after 2000 and critically assess their strengths and limitations. Together with an overview of recent understanding, we highlight the need for a combined experimental and computational approach to study ion transport in solids of desired time and length scales and for precise measurements of physical parameters related to ion transport.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation
Jain, A., Ong, S. P., Hautier, G., Chen, W., Richards, W. D., Dacek, S., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Skinner, D., Ceder, G., et al. (2013) · APL Materials · doi:10.1063/1.4812323 · Cited by 13,094
Reproducibility in density functional theory calculations of solids
Lejaeghere, K., Bihlmayer, G., Björkman, T., Blaha, P., Blügel, S., Blum, V., Caliste, D., Castelli, I. E., Clark, S. J., Dal Corso, A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad3000 · Cited by 1,649
Cited by
Wang, C., Liang, J., Zhao, Y., Zheng, M., Li, X., & Sun, X. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00551k · Cited by 489
Huang, J., Wu, K., Xu, G., Wu, M., Dou, S., & Wu, C. (2023) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs01029a · Cited by 304
Gu, P., Song, Y., Fan, Y., Meng, X., Liu, J., Wang, G., Li, Z., Sun, H., Zhao, Z., & Zou, J. (2025) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202403657 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, Y., Nolan, A. M., Du, P., Wu, Y., Yang, C., Chen, Q., Mo, Y., & Bo, S.-H.
- Venue
- Chemical Reviews
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-04-29
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5954-6008
- ISSN
- 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6890
- OpenAlex
- W3018657932
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classical and Emerging Characterization Techniques for Investigation of Ion Transport Mechanisms in Crystalline Fast Ionic Conductors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00747
- The paper
- Gao, Y., Nolan, A. M., Du, P., Wu, Y., Yang, C., Chen, Q., Mo, Y., & Bo, S.-H. (2020). Classical and Emerging Characterization Techniques for Investigation of Ion Transport Mechanisms in Crystalline Fast Ionic Conductors. Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00747
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.