Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Demonstration of the Entire Production Chain to Renewable Kerosene via Solar Thermochemical Splitting of H2O and CO2

Marxer, Daniel, Furler, Philipp, Scheffe, Jonathan, Geerlings, Hans, Falter, Christoph, Batteiger, Valentin, Sizmann, Andreas, Steinfeld, Aldo·2015·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

The European consortium SOLARJET has experimentally demonstrated the first ever production of jet fuel via a thermochemical H 2 O/CO 2 -splitting cycle using simulated concentrated solar radiation. The key component of the production process of sustainable “solar kerosene” is a high-temperature solar reactor containing a reticulated porous ceramic (RPC) foam structure made of pure CeO 2 undergoing a 2-step redox cyclic process. During the first endothermic reduction step at 1450–1600 °C, the RPC was directly exposed to concentrated thermal radiation with power inputs ranging from 2.8 to 3.8 kW and mean solar flux concentration ratios of up to 3000 suns. In the subsequent exothermic oxidation step at 700–1200 °C, the reduced ceria was stoichiometrically reoxidized with CO 2 and/or H 2 O to generate CO and/or H 2 . The RPC featured dual-scale porosity: millimeter-size pores for volumetric radiation absorption during reduction and micrometer-size pores within its struts for enhanced oxidation rates. For a cycle duration of 25 min, mean reduction rates were 0.17 mL O2 min –1 g –1 CeO2 and mean oxidation rates were 0.60 mL CO min –1 g –1 CeO2 . The solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency was 1.72%, without sensible heat recovery. A total of 291 stable redox cycles were performed, yielding 700 standard liters of syngas of composition 33.7% H 2, 19.2% CO, 30.5% CO 2, 0.06% O 2, 0.09% CH 4, and 16.5% Ar, which was compressed to 150 bar and further processed via Fischer–Tropsch synthesis to a mixture of naphtha, gasoil, and kerosene.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00351

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Marxer, D., Furler, P., Scheffe, J., Geerlings, H., Falter, C., Batteiger, V., Sizmann, A., & Steinfeld, A.
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2015-04-27
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
3241-3250
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W2322529498
Cited by
206
References
2
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Demonstration of the Entire Production Chain to Renewable Kerosene via Solar Thermochemical Splitting of H2O and CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00351
The paper
Marxer, D., Furler, P., Scheffe, J., Geerlings, H., Falter, C., Batteiger, V., Sizmann, A., & Steinfeld, A. (2015). Demonstration of the Entire Production Chain to Renewable Kerosene via Solar Thermochemical Splitting of H2O and CO2. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00351

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.