The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Techno-economic Analysis of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Hydrogen and Natural Gas Storage
Open accessAbstract
A techno-economic analysis was conducted for metal–organic framework (MOF) adsorbents, which are promising candidates for light-duty vehicle on-board natural gas and hydrogen storage. The goal of this analysis was to understand cost drivers for large-scale (2.5 Mkg/year) MOF synthesis and to identify potential pathways to achieving a production cost of less than $10/(kg of MOF). Four MOFs were analyzed with four different metal centers and three different linkers: Ni 2 (dobdc) (dobdc 4– = 2,5-dioxido-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate; Ni-MOF-74), Mg 2 (dobdc) (dobdc 4– = 2,5-dioxido-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate; Mg-MOF-74), Zn 4 O(bdc) 3 (bdc 2– = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate; MOF-5), and Cu 3 (btc) 2 (btc 3– = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate; HKUST-1). Baseline costs are projected to range from $35/kg to $71/kg predicated on organic solvent (solvothermal) syntheses using an engineering scale-up of laboratory-demonstrated synthesis procedures and conditions. Two alternative processes were analyzed to evaluate the cost impact of reducing solvent usage: liquid assisted grinding (LAG) and aqueous synthesis. Cost projections from these alternative synthesis approaches range from $13/kg to $36/kg (representing 34–83% reductions), demonstrating the large impact of solvent on the baseline analysis. Finally, sensitivity studies were conducted to identify additional opportunities for achieving MOF production costs of less than $10/kg.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Younas, M., Rezakazemi, M., Daud, M., Wazir, M. B., Ahmad, S., Ullah, N., Inamuddin, & Ramakrishna, S. (2020) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100849 · Cited by 421
Kinetic stability of metal–organic frameworks for corrosive and coordinating gas capture
Rieth, A. J., Wright, A. M., & Dincă, M. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0140-1 · Cited by 402
Regeneration, degradation, and toxicity effect of MOFs: Opportunities and challenges
Kumar, P., Anand, B., Tsang, Y. F., Kim, K.-H., Khullar, S., & Wang, B. (2019) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.019 · Cited by 319
Sinha, A., Darunte, L. A., Jones, C. W., Realff, M. J., & Kawajiri, Y. (2017) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.6b03887 · Cited by 282
ChatGPT Research Group for Optimizing the Crystallinity of MOFs and COFs
Zheng, Z., Zhang, O., Nguyen, H. L., Rampal, N., Alawadhi, A. H., Rong, Z., Head-Gordon, T., Borgs, C., Chayes, J. T., & Yaghi, O. M. (2023) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.3c01087 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- DeSantis, D., Mason, J. A., James, B. D., Houchins, C., Long, J. R., & Veenstra, M.
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-01-26
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2024-2032
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2570504957
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Techno-economic Analysis of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Hydrogen and Natural Gas Storage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02510
- The paper
- DeSantis, D., Mason, J. A., James, B. D., Houchins, C., Long, J. R., & Veenstra, M. (2017). Techno-economic Analysis of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Hydrogen and Natural Gas Storage. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.