Cited by 2Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesCatalysis for Biomass ConversionCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Hydrodeoxygenation of Guaiacol over Ni–Mo 2 C Catalysts: Effect of Synthesis Strategy on Activity and Selectivity

Open access
Davtyan, Davit, Aghoyan, Artur, Aleksanyan, Gurgen, Ghazaryan, Vahram, Akopyan, Argam·2026·Energy & Fuels

Abstract

Designing efficient catalysts for hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) is vital for upgrading biomass-derived feedstocks into cleaner fuels and high-added value chemicals. In this study, we investigated two distinct strategies for synthesizing Ni-modified molybdenum carbide (Mo2C) catalysts: a one-step microwave-assisted carburization method (NiMo2C) and a sequential approach involving incipient wetness impregnation of microwave-synthesized Mo2C with nickel nitrate (Ni/Mo2C). Comprehensive physicochemical characterization using XRD, XPS, SEM/EDS, TEM, BET, and H2-TPR revealed pronounced differences in structure and surface chemistry. These structural differences in morphology, dispersion, and metal-support interactions significantly influenced catalytic behavior. Ni/Mo2C demonstrated superior performance in guaiacol HDO achieving overall conversion of 98% mostly forming high H/C products (cyclohexane), which is exclusively displayed by this catalyst. Additionally, the catalyst displays high stability, enabling the same conversion to proceed for more than 10 hours. The findings underscore the critical role of synthetic pathways in tailoring the structure–function relationship of carbide-based catalysts for biomass conversion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c00573

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Davtyan, D., Aghoyan, A., Aleksanyan, G., Ghazaryan, V., & Akopyan, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Chemical Physics NAS RA (AM)
  • Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Corresponding author
Akopyan, Argam
Venue
Energy & Fuels
Published
2026-04-03
Volume
40
Issue
15
Pages
8142-8160
ISSN
  • 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5029
OpenAlex
W7148692741
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy & Fuels (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Funders
State Committee of Science (22rl007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
hydrodeoxygenation, guaiacol, molybdenum carbide, incipient wetness impregnation, catalyst synthesis strategies, metal-support interaction, cyclohexane selectivity, biomass feedstock, catalyst stability, structure-activity relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review