Mobile Autothermal Pyrolysis System for Local Biomass Conversion: Process Simulation and Techno-Economic Analysis
Abstract
This paper presents a mobile autothermal pyrolysis system for locally converting biomass feedstock into bio-oil that can be transported easily. The system includes a compact internally interconnected fluidized bed (IIFB) reactor, a biomass pretreatment facility, and a product recovery unit. On the basis of modified chemical kinetic models, the pyrolysis process of common forestry and agricultural residues in this mobile system has been simulated. The pyrolytic product distribution from simulation has good agreements with experimental results. Then, the techno-economic performance of the mobile pyrolysis system in China is evaluated and compared with other liquid biofuel production facilities, i.e., fixed biomass pyrolysis plants and Fischer–Tropsch liquids production via biomass gasification (BG-FT). The results indicate that the biomass feedstock cost of mobile pyrolysis systems can be effectively reduced. Compared with the fixed biofuel production plant, the labor cost is higher for the mobile plant. Though the fixed system has a lower initial investment, the mobile system has a lower biofuel production cost. Overall, the mobile pyrolysis system has a better long-term economy than the fixed plant, due to the larger profit. The mobile system can be profitable in the sixth year, which is one year earlier than the fixed ones.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Few studies have evaluated the use of portable systems; however, their main focus is the production of bio-oil as the main product, but not biochar.
“Few studies have evaluated the use of portable systems; however, their main focus is the production of bio-oil as the main product, but not biochar [20][21][22][23].”
From Lifecycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Biochar Pellet Production from Forest Residues and Field Application (2022) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Detailed kinetic modeling of the thermal degradation of lignins
Faravelli, T., Frassoldati, A., Migliavacca, G., & Ranzi, E. (2010) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.10.018 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Figueirêdo, M. B., Hita, I., Deuss, P. J., Venderbosch, R. H., & Heeres, H. J. (2022) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d2gc00302c · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Bergman, R., Sahoo, K., Englund, K., & Mousavi-Avval, S. H. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15041559 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, X., Zhang, H., & Xiao, R.
- Affiliations
- Southeast University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xiao, Rui
- Venue
- Energy & Fuels
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-02-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4178-4188
- ISSN
- 0887-0624 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5029
- OpenAlex
- W2788065379
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Energy & Fuels (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51561145010, 51525601)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Keywords
- biomass pyrolysis, bio-oil, biomass pretreatment, chemical kinetic modeling, forest residues, agricultural residues, techno-economic analysis, biofuel production costs, biomass gasification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review