The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Critical Review on Thin-Film Nanocomposite Membranes with Interlayered Structure: Mechanisms, Recent Developments, and Environmental Applications
Abstract
The separation properties of polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes, widely applied for desalination and water reuse, are constrained by the permeability-selectivity upper bound. Although thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes incorporating nanomaterials exhibit enhanced water permeance, their rejection is only moderately improved or even impaired due to agglomeration of nanomaterials and formation of defects. A novel type of TFN membranes featuring an interlayer of nanomaterials (TFNi) has emerged in recent years. These novel TFNi membranes show extraordinary improvement in water flux (e.g., up to an order of magnitude enhancement) along with better selectivity. Such enhancements can be achieved by a wide selection of nanomaterials, ranging from nanoparticles, one-/two-dimensional materials, to interfacial coatings. The use of nanostructured interlayers not only improves the formation of polyamide rejection layers but also provides an optimized water transport path, which enables TFNi membranes to potentially overcome the longstanding trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Furthermore, TFNi membranes can potentially enhance the removal of heavy metals and micropollutants, which is critical for many environmental applications. This review critically examines the recent developments of TFNi membranes and discusses the underlying mechanisms and design criteria. Their potential environmental applications are also highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings
Lee, H., Dellatore, S. M., Miller, W. M., & Messersmith, P. B. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1147241 · Cited by 10,965
Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review
Fu, F., & Wang, Q. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 · Cited by 8,703
Membrane-based technologies for lithium recovery from water lithium resources: A review
Li, X., Mo, Y., Qing, W., Shao, S., Tang, C. Y., & Li, J. (2019) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117317 · Cited by 756
Self-citationYang, Z., Zhou, Z.-W., Guo, H., Yao, Z., Ma, X.-H., Song, X., Feng, S.-P., & Tang, C. Y. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b02425 · Cited by 437
Self-citationKampioti, A. (2002) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00470-5 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Lu, X., & Elimelech, M. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00502a · Cited by 657
Osman, A. I., Chen, Z., Elgarahy, A. M., Farghali, M., Mohamed, I. M. A., Priya, A. K., Hawash, H. B., & Yap, P. (2024) · Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research · doi:10.1002/aesr.202400011 · Cited by 365
Shao, S., Zeng, F., Long, L., Zhu, X., Peng, L. E., Wang, F., Yang, Z., & Tang, C. Y. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c04736 · Cited by 355
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Z., Sun, P.-F., Li, X., Gan, B., Wang, L., Song, X., Park, H.-D., & Tang, C. Y.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-11-19
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 15563-15583
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W3105252764
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.